1.1 to 1.2.3

2003-01-20 Thread Ernesto Jardim
Hi I'll report my experience. Maybe it will help. I had some trouble in finding the file. I had to download version 1.3.0 and compile it so I could get the lyx2lyx file. The rest was pretty simple has lyx files have the format number in the beggining I just made a less to the file and it was ok.

Re: 1.1 to 1.2.3

2003-01-17 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 12:12:46PM +, John Levon wrote: > > Unfortunately. > > A HA ! Now I have you on record as wanting to be user unfriendly :) I will change my mind if it suits my secrets plans. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor

Re: 1.1 to 1.2.3

2003-01-17 Thread John Levon
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 01:08:15PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > Which do you think is the more user-friendly option? > > John's disease is spreading. ;-) > > Unfortunately. A HA ! Now I have you on record as wanting to be user unfriendly :) regards john -- "Life is like a clock: You c

Re: 1.1 to 1.2.3

2003-01-17 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 12:13:38PM +, José Matos wrote: > a) the file format wins > b) the lyx versions wins > c) we abort as the user is really confused c) > Which do you think is the more user-friendly option? > John's disease is spreading. ;-) Unfortunately. Andre' -- Those

Re: 1.1 to 1.2.3

2003-01-17 Thread José Matos
On Friday 17 January 2003 11:46, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > What is the interface you are thinking about? Using new options? Just > > for for the output format? > > New options. Output is probably sufficient as input is auto-detected. Agreed. In the case where both are present what shall we do?

Re: 1.1 to 1.2.3

2003-01-17 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 11:35:28AM +, José Matos wrote: > > BTW, Jose, an idea for lyx2lyx, for people who want to run it by hand: > > it would be nice to specify the format as a lyx version number, since > > noone really knows what is the right format for lyx 1.2.0, for example. > > What i

Re: 1.1 to 1.2.3

2003-01-17 Thread José Matos
On Friday 17 January 2003 09:16, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "José" == José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > José> On Thursday 16 January 2003 13:30, Matej Cepl wrote: > >> There should be script lyx2lyx somewhere around www.lyx.org, which > >> should help. > > José> That comes with

Re: 1.1 to 1.2.3

2003-01-17 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "José" == José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: José> On Thursday 16 January 2003 13:30, Matej Cepl wrote: >> There should be script lyx2lyx somewhere around www.lyx.org, which >> should help. José> That comes with 1.3.0pre... But we could also distribute it separately, no? BTW, Jose,

Re: 1.1 to 1.2.3

2003-01-16 Thread José Matos
On Thursday 16 January 2003 13:30, Matej Cepl wrote: > > There should be script lyx2lyx somewhere around www.lyx.org, > which should help. That comes with 1.3.0pre... > Matej -- José Abílio

Re: 1.1 to 1.2.3

2003-01-16 Thread Matej Cepl
Ernesto Jardim wrote: > I have a file writen in LyX 1.1.0 and now I'm working in LyX 1.2.3. When > I open the old file my tables appear in LaTeX code, of course they're > still tables and I'm able to produce a nice ps file, but I'm not able to > use the LyX facilities to format then. There should

1.1 to 1.2.3

2003-01-16 Thread Ernesto Jardim
Hi I have a file writen in LyX 1.1.0 and now I'm working in LyX 1.2.3. When I open the old file my tables appear in LaTeX code, of course they're still tables and I'm able to produce a nice ps file, but I'm not able to use the LyX facilities to format then. Is there a way around this ? Thanks E