>>Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 17:30:06 +0300
>>From: Tuukka Toivonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: Re: .ps and .eps for graphics
>>
>>On Thu, 25 May 2000, Rod Pinna wrote:
>>
>>> Just while everybody is putting wis
On Thu, 25 May 2000, Rod Pinna wrote:
> Just while everybody is putting wish list items up...would it be possible
> to not have to incude the .eps or .ps extension for included graphics
Another item to the wishlist: it should be possible to use other than just
.eps files. For example, one would
Hello all,
Just while everybody is putting wish list items up...would it be possible
to not have to incude the .eps or .ps extension for included graphics
files? The \includegraphics command is smart enough to be able to pick the
right sort of file, depending on whether latex or pdflatex is used.
