Francisco Hidalgo Sola wrote:
El Mié 19 May 2004 08:55, Juergen Spitzmueller escribió:
Vinay Ramnath wrote:
is it possible to make a footnote in a table? I do get the superscript
number at the position of the word I want to make a note about, but I do
not get the actual footnote.
That's a
Les Denham wrote:
You can put the footnote in the table (which gives the superscript number)
then immediately after the table add the text of the footnote in ERT:
\footnotetext{The actual footnote goes here}
This works perfectly for a small table and one footnote. I don't know whether
it works
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
Vinay Ramnath wrote:
is it possible to make a footnote in a table? I do get the superscript
number at the position of the word I want to make a note about, but I do
not get the actual footnote.
That's a LaTeX restriction. See
http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq
Hi,
is it possible to make a footnote in a table? I do get the superscript
number at the position of the word I want to make a note about, but I do
not get the actual footnote.
I do not necessarily need the actual note in the table. LaTeX will
figure where it should be, probably at the bottom o
Hi again,
Andre Poenitz wrote:
Looks good C++ wise. Actually, I would have expected libforms to show up.
Did you link this statically?
I don't have any idea. What I did was I went to /usr/local/bin and typed
ldd lyx-1.2.3 and this is what I got.
Is that a satisfactory answer? I didn't link a
Allright, it installed fine and as far as I can see everything works as
it should. Also, LyX 1.2.1 still works, even though I've replaced
XForms. I installed the rpm of XForms and compiled LyX. Thank you all
for your help!
ldd lyx-1.2.3 does give output, but I don't know how to put it in an
e-
Thanks!
Thorsten Mika wrote:
Try "ls -l /your/path/to/wmaker" and watch the creation
date. If it's not too old, it's your new wmaker.
Allright, it is created yesterday. It did upgrade. Funny that they
didn't change the number in the info panel. Well, anyway, I wouldn't
call it a bug. Everythi
Hi,
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 07:14:06PM +0100, Vinay Ramnath wrote:
Nope, didn't work. My C++ compiler doesn't seem to suffice. I use SuSE
8.0 with gcc as compiler. During configuration, the machine complaints
that it cannot execute `cc1plus'.
Looks li
Hi Andre,
Andre Poenitz wrote:
Looks like a broken gcc installation. Can you compile a simple "hello
world" program?
Sorry, my programming skils are horrible, at least in C. In the early
days I experimented some with BASIC on a C64, but off course you don't
compile there.
Though, gcc has bee
Nope, didn't work. My C++ compiler doesn't seem to suffice. I use SuSE
8.0 with gcc as compiler. During configuration, the machine complaints
that it cannot execute `cc1plus'. Which compiler do you recommend for
compiling LyX. Does it have anything to do with libXpm. I didn't need it
when I ins
Hi ?,
? wrote:
Hi
You don't have to compile the source code because the rpm is available in the bin directory on the lyx ftp site.
Jihene
Oh, I failed to notice. Well, the other solution seems pretty cool and
painless, so I'll try that one first. If that fails and I still want
1.2.3 very badl
Hi Michael,
Michael Abshoff wrote:
> if you want to run more than one version of lyx in parallel do a
>
> ./configure --program-suffix=-1.2.3 --with-version-suffix=-1.2.3
Ok, before I do that, do I have to upgrade XForms for the new LyX
version? Currently, I use xforms-0.89-1, also an rpm. If I d
Hi,
until now, I've only installed the LyX rpm. I want to upgrade to 1.2.3,
of which there only the source code is available on the LyX site. That's
ok, I've compiled things before, but do I have to remove my current
installation of LyX, using "rpm -e lyx", or can I just compile and
install th
Hi LyX users,
in "Rapportagetechniek" (reporting technique, ISBN 90-01-29137-6) they
tell me to group coherent paragraphs. Some paragraphs have more to do
with another than others. Those you have to group, that is, use no empty
space between them, but ident each new paragraph in that group. You
I choose c.
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> (c) "I don't care"
>
>
>
It is not that I am ignorant about this, but LyX looks fine if you
change the colours to your taste. The other things the developers want
to implement in 1.3.x seem more important to me than the GUI, so if they
have it ready and want to
Allright, it took some time, but I did it. I removed /usr/local/teTeX/
which contained my manual installation of teTeX as described in their
manual. Before that, I had already uninstalled it using /bin/sh
install.sh and unselecting everything. I installed teTeX with YaST2 and
installed the rpm
me from LyX's configuration
>script. You could also try to re-run it as user (given that your PATH
>is correct for the user - can you start those binaries as user?)
>
Yes, as a user, so in a terminal where I've not used su root, I can
start the dvi viewer with /usr/local/teTeX/b
I hadn't, but I just tried. It ends up the same. I installed the src.rpm
package now, since the rebuild option doesn't work on the rpm. It
started compiling and I did not see any complaints, but I had not
installed libXpm, which is needed for the compilation. I had XForms,
though. Running the
Hi,
the installation of teTeX went fine. I put it in /usr/local/teTeX, which
was the default. However, when I tried to install LyX using rpm -Uvh
--nodeps lyx-1.2.1* it seems like the installer can't find anything of
my teTeX installation. Among others, it can't find a LaTeX2e package and
it
19 matches
Mail list logo
