"Kayvan A. Sylvan" wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 09:53:52PM +0200, Klaus Vink Slott wrote:
> > This may bee a generic bug
> Yes! Thanks, you nailed it.
:-)
I see that you have sent a copy to the developers list, so I will do no
further.
And now lets get
"Kayvan A. Sylvan" wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 06:16:20PM +0200, Klaus Vink Slott wrote:
> >
> > Now I got only one concern. When I start Lyx and select file -> new an
> > error message pop up: Alert - LyX internal error. The alert box states
>
Ronny Buchmann wrote:
>
> i installed lyx-1.1.6fix3-1.i386.rpm (and xforms-0.88-3) on rh7.1 yesterday, no
>problems so far
OK I got it now, my rpm install problems was trigged by trying to use
xforms-0.89 - witch after all is the one on the site directed to if one
follow the link to "stuff that
Adam Huffman wrote:
>
> On Sat, 28 Jul 2001, John Levon wrote:
>
> > this is means we need someone with RH7.1, who can build RPMs for it ...
> >
>
> > You can also build using rpm -bb from the src.rpm.
> >
> > Then it can be contributed pack to Kayvan's site ...
>
> I can do that if there's de
"Kayvan A. Sylvan" wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jul 2001, Klaus Vink Slott wrote:
> > Is it possible to get Lyx working on a RH 7.1 using rpm packages?
> Yes, it is possible. You need to use the right xforms version (not
> the one they provide) and the right compiler. It *does* w
Just saw thread about installing lyx on a RH7.1 system. There was a lot
of messages about RH politics, compare other distributions ect. But I
saw no messages whith actual help.
Is it possible to get Lyx working on a RH 7.1 using rpm packages?
Regards
Klaus V. Slott
