On 3/04/2018 11:31 a.m., Scott Kostyshak wrote:
I propose to change the first part to something like:
Your MiKTeX installation must be updated in order for LyX 2.3.0 to
work. Choose "Continue" to ...
Then, we will give a link to a Wiki page, as discussed before.
This will allow us to ke
On Mon, 2 Apr 2018 10:34:19 +1000
Alan Tyree wrote:
> Hello Steve,
> I would think YAML is the best choice here. It is easy to type and
> easy for the beginner to understand. You could provide simple
> templates for the most common cases. My own feeling is that anything
> more complicated is goin
On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 07:17:57AM +, Baris Erkus wrote:
> I have seen many posts to TeX SE, where users encounters this sort of issues.
> Most of the time, waiting one or two days solves the issue, which I believe
> MikTeX developer(s) fix the associated problem.
I've seen many posts like
On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 02:38:58PM +, V K wrote:
> Sentence "For most users, choosing "Continue" is the appropriate choice."
> sounds definately better. But I am not inexperienced user and for me minimum
> information why should I continue (but more specific than only "LyX
> requires") is be
On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 03:02:02AM +, Andrew Parsloe wrote:
> Dear Scott,
>
> MiKTeX 2.9 has been available since 2010 and the *only* version available
> since 2014; see https://miktex.org/releases. Hence the message in your
> proposed dialogue
>
> LyX requires MiKTeX 2.9 or later. Yo
Sentence "For most users, choosing "Continue" is the appropriate choice."
sounds definately better. But I am not inexperienced user and for me minimum
information why should I continue (but more specific than only "LyX requires")
is better. A lot of detales would be too complex. "More details" w
I just updated MikTeX after some problems with LyX lately. (LyX 2.2.3, Windows
10, 64 bit).
When trying to preview a LyX document, I get the following error message:
[cid:image003.jpg@01D3CA9A.7F05B090]
When clicking on “Yes”, the following detail pops up:
[cid:image004.jpg@01D3CA9A.7F
Hello,
I want to join to this discussion again and would like to clarify my previous
post that had suggested a totally different approach.
I am a very frequent user of MikTeX in the sense that I update it almost weekly
basis.
MikTeX is a very “good” TeX system but sometimes it acts awkwa
