Re: Windows users: can you test the 2.3.0 installer?

2018-03-01 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 06:01:55PM +, Uwe Stöhr wrote: > > Scott, I tend to delay the public announce for LyX on Windows for some days. OK. Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Windows users: can you test the 2.3.0 installer?

2018-03-01 Thread Emile Lunardon
I always use the bundle version of LyX for my installations (...LyX2.2.2, LyX2.2.3, LyX2.3 RC1, LyX2.3RC2, LyX2.3) together with a local version of Miktex and it is the first time I have this kind of problem. 2018-03-01 17:15 GMT+01:00 Scott Kostyshak : > On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 10:26:20AM +,

Re: Windows users: can you test the 2.3.0 installer?

2018-03-01 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Am 01.03.2018 um 17:15 schrieb Scott Kostyshak: CONCLUSION The installation of LyX2.3 seems to corrupt the Miktex configuration. This is not due to an interaction with the anti-virus (disabled). Hopefully an upgrade of Miktex (if there is a new package to install) repairs Miktex 2.9 and allows

Re: Automatically reload externally changed ".lyx" files?

2018-03-01 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 12:39:22PM +, Klaus-Dieter Bauer wrote: > Hello! > > At least as of LyX 2.3.0 LyX displays a "Reload file" prompt, if it detects > that the LyX file has been changed externally, e.g. by Dropbox, external > version control, or user scripts. As a great bonus, LyX even che

Re: Windows users: can you test the 2.3.0 installer?

2018-03-01 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 10:26:20AM +, Emile Lunardon wrote: > CONCLUSION > The installation of LyX2.3 seems to corrupt the Miktex configuration. This > is not due to an interaction with the anti-virus (disabled). Hopefully an > upgrade of Miktex (if there is a new package to install) repairs

Re: Windows users: can you test the 2.3.0 installer?

2018-03-01 Thread Scott Kostyshak
On Thu, Mar 01, 2018 at 10:26:20AM +, Emile Lunardon wrote: > I tried again to install LyX2.3 on my PC running on WINDOWS 8.1. This time > as you have suggested, I have disabled the virus scanner (windows defender) > and installed only for the current user. > The result is identical to the firs

Re: 2.3.0 installer test on Windows 10

2018-03-01 Thread José Abílio Matos
On Wednesday, 28 February 2018 17.25.43 WET Eric Barkan wrote: > Jose: I personally don't require any Babel packages; this just came up > during testing. So no need to change the spec file, at least not for me. > > Thanks! > > Eric Barkan The underlying issue is what is the adequate set of late

Re: AW: Windows users: can you test the 2.3.0 installer?

2018-03-01 Thread racoon
On 28.02.2018 10:49, a...@andreashegenbart.de wrote: The error "platex.exe not found" I received some weeks ago as well with installing lyx 2.2.3 Hi Andreas, Do you happen to use Avast Antivirus? At least that is what I expect my problem came from. If you use it then my hunch is that Avast sc

Re: Windows users: can you test the 2.3.0 installer?

2018-03-01 Thread Emile Lunardon
I tried again to install LyX2.3 on my PC running on WINDOWS 8.1. This time as you have suggested, I have disabled the virus scanner (windows defender) and installed only for the current user. The result is identical to the first installation attempt : neither LyX2.3 nor LyX2.2.3 document compilatio