Hi,
I think Greg's post is key here.
Even if the two users are never editing at the same time, having always the
latest version with all merges applied is reassuring.
@Rob: "Yet, I've never actually met anyone who writes with others in real
time." I think this is because the tech didn't even exist
Hi Kevin,
I tried Gobby. it's as simple as notepad, so for serious programming/writing
it'd feel a bit limited. But the deal breaker is no undo. Yes, you hear that
right. I think Gobby is actually feature-wise worse than in-browser
alternatives.
Best,
-Jose
Jose Quesada, PhD.
Research scientist,
M
Alberto,
I am also using LyX 1.6.7 on Windows, and have no trouble with the spell
checker. Can you provide a bit more information? What installer did you use?
What os (Vista, XP, W7)? Do you know how to start a spell-check, and you get
a message? What exactly? Please explain.
Jacob
On Fri, Sep 2
On 09/24/2010 05:34 PM, Julien Rioux wrote:
On 24/09/2010 3:01 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
This could almost be done without any changes to LyX. Here's how.
1. Set up a cron job that does "svn up filename.lyx" every two minutes.
2. Set up another cron job that watches filename.lyx and, if it changes
Am 24.09.2010 um 18:47 schrieb goncalo.b.santos:
>
> Hi!
>
> I'm using Lyx on a mac (OSX) but am not being able to get the spellchecker
> to work.
You're using which version?
> I've downloaded the latest version of cocoaspell, installed it, went to
> system preferences/spelling/dictionaries an
Hi
I have installed Lyx 1.6.7 for windows, and noticed that there is no spell
checker. Downloaded Aspell and reconfigured Lyx. However, I have not been able
to make it work.Everything else works just fine.
Will appreciate your help
Regards
Alberto
On 24/09/2010 3:01 PM, Richard Heck wrote:
This could almost be done without any changes to LyX. Here's how.
1. Set up a cron job that does "svn up filename.lyx" every two minutes.
2. Set up another cron job that watches filename.lyx and, if it changes,
does "svn ci filename.lyx".
If I was craz
Paul,
> First off, unless you have a specific reason to put the article-only text in
> child documents, I'd probably advocate including it in the original text file
> in
> branches (just to keep things together). If you have a particular reason to
> use
> child documents, then maybe put the chi
First off, unless you have a specific reason to put the article-only text in
child documents, I'd probably advocate including it in the original text file in
branches (just to keep things together). If you have a particular reason to use
child documents, then maybe put the child include statements
On 09/24/2010 01:34 PM, Gregory Jefferis wrote:
Non-interactive collaborative editing means that there can always be one
live version of a document to which anyone can apply changes that are
versioned, identified and much more likely. Essentially it solves the
conflicting merge problem by autom
Richard
>> I guess this is impossible.
>>
>> Unless someone has had a brainwave since my original post.
>>
>>
>
> I just haven't had time to think about it. LyX time is spent chasing other
> bugs right now.
I still appreciate you thinking about it, if you do have a sudden
eureka moment, then I w
On 09/24/2010 02:21 PM, Kevin Brubeck Unhammer wrote:
I think the ideal situation would look like Gobby[1] running inside
LyX (not necessarily with chat features, but at least showing where
the other user is editing), but I can understand how that would be a
lot of work to implement. Sponsorship
Steve,
> All Unleashed books are written by a main author and lots of contributing
> authors. However, it's carved up by chapter, so no chapter is collaborative.
While this may well be true in general, the two books I have
collaborated on (my only book experience) I contributed to every
chapter,
I would simply like to say that I think going too far down this road could
lead to a lot of effort, and only a marginal return. I think we do need to
make LyX better, but I don't think it needs to be too multi-purpose. You
know the whole Swiss-Army knife versus a tool that does one thing, but does
2010/9/24 Gregory Jefferis :
> Non-interactive collaborative editing means that there can always be one
> live version of a document to which anyone can apply changes that are
> versioned, identified and much more likely. Essentially it solves the
> conflicting merge problem by automatically mergi
On Friday 24 September 2010 11:29:10 Rob Oakes wrote:
> Hi Jose and other LyX-Users,
>
> Very interesting articles, thanks for sending them.
>
> While trying to digest the ideas, though, I found myself asking two
> questions and I'd be interested in your feedback. The first question, of
> cour
On Friday 24 September 2010 10:18:30 Kevin Brubeck Unhammer wrote:
> 2010/9/24 Jose Quesada :
> > Hi,
> > We've had previous discussions on whether or not it's useful to have some
> > kind of real-time collaboration in LyX.
> > The death of wave seemed to reinforce the idea that this is not a kille
Thank you all for your responses. I will just leave it with the comment
that this is a functionality that I would definitely be interested in, if it
were to be incorporated in some future version of lyx.
-Gwen
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Murat Yildizoglu <
murat.yildizo...@univ-cezanne.fr
Hi all,
I would distinguish two kinds of collaborative editing.
* interactive collaborative editing - 2 or more people working
simultaneously on a document
* non-interactive collaborative editing - only one person actually modifying
the document at any one time BUT others always having live acce
Hi Les,
> I had no idea people were asking for this kind of feature. Real-time
> collaboration on a document seems to me to be a formula for a colossal waste
> of time, extending the concept of endless meetings to an online equivalent.
I'm not sure if ti's people in general or just people that
I guess this is impossible.
Unless someone has had a brainwave since my original post.
I've had no reply to this on the Beamer forum or on the comp.text.tex group.
I was hoping that someone might have known of a simple Latex switch
to switch off the graphics and the article only text, but obvio
On 09/24/2010 11:58 AM, Lars Olesen wrote:
I tried to export my lyx document. It has a lot of bibtex references.
The references shows up correctly in the document when editing it.
However, they appear just as question marks when I export the file.
The only way I can export it where the reference
On 09/24/2010 12:31 PM, Bruce Pourciau wrote:
In the article class, the quote environment puts some extra space
above and below the quotation to help separate it from the body text.
In the article (AMS) class, though, the quote environment inserts no
extra space, which would seem in conflict wi
On 24 September 2010 12:41, Richard Heck wrote:
>
> Still, I have to agree with Rob that doing this at the level of each
> program just seems wrong in principle. Having some very generic
> client-server model, where the program's display could show up here there
> and everywhere, and the program
Hi!
I'm using Lyx on a mac (OSX) but am not being able to get the spellchecker
to work.
I've downloaded the latest version of cocoaspell, installed it, went to
system preferences/spelling/dictionaries and put all the dictionaries in the
list "on".
In Lyx I did preferences/language settings/spell
On 09/24/2010 11:43 AM, Les Denham wrote:
On Friday 24 September 2010 10:29:10 Rob Oakes wrote:
Anyone else have any thoughts?
Rob,
I had no idea people were asking for this kind of feature. Real-time
collaboration on a document seems to me to be a formula for a colossal waste
of t
In the article class, the quote environment puts some extra space
above and below the quotation to help separate it from the body text.
In the article (AMS) class, though, the quote environment inserts no
extra space, which would seem in conflict with normal typographic
practice. What would
I tried to export my lyx document. It has a lot of bibtex references.
The references shows up correctly in the document when editing it.
However, they appear just as question marks when I export the file.
The only way I can export it where the reference name (but not the
entire reference list) appe
On Friday 24 September 2010 10:29:10 Rob Oakes wrote:
> Anyone else have any thoughts?
>
Rob,
I had no idea people were asking for this kind of feature. Real-time
collaboration on a document seems to me to be a formula for a colossal waste
of time, extending the concept of endless meetings to
Hi Jose and other LyX-Users,
Very interesting articles, thanks for sending them.
While trying to digest the ideas, though, I found myself asking two questions
and I'd be interested in your feedback. The first question, of course is
spurred by pure skepticism.
In what instances do you think th
Hi Kevin, Jose et al,
We use version control (git) + to write papers in the lab. It works fine
but handling merge conflicts is still difficult; the chaps in the lab are
all very computer literate but I regularly have to help out with a broken
merge. It's certainly too complicated for me to insist
2010/9/24 Jose Quesada :
> Hi,
> We've had previous discussions on whether or not it's useful to have some
> kind of real-time collaboration in LyX.
> The death of wave seemed to reinforce the idea that this is not a killer
> feature, and people don't need it. Collaboration using a VCS is sufficien
Hi,
We've had previous discussions on whether or not it's useful to have some
kind of real-time collaboration in LyX.
The death of wave seemed to reinforce the idea that this is not a killer
feature, and people don't need it. Collaboration using a VCS is sufficient.
Well, recently I found two coun
Am 24.09.2010 14:39, schrieb Sachin Garg:
What exactly is the problem? In the IEEEtran template there is an image
named "CV-image.png" as example. Simply left-click on that image and
select an image file you like.
I am also unable to add a photo. I can't also see this "CV-image.png"
file. I am
On Tuesday 14 September 2010 08:05 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 13.09.2010 07:20, schrieb step...@vinvish.com:
>
>> In the end of the IEEE trans template there is an option to insert the
>> authors photo in the Biography section
>> If we do nothing a BOX printed with "PLACE YOUR PHOTO HERE " appears
xPol wrote:
> How to type the arccot function?
>
> It seems strange it is not included in the lyx functions list. Isn't a latex
> function?
No, LaTeX stops at arctan...
If you use it often, just put in your document preamble:
\DeclareMathOperator{\arccot}{arccot}
and then you can typeset just
How to type the arccot function?
It seems strange it is not included in the lyx functions list. Isn't a latex
function?
thank you
---p
37 matches
Mail list logo
