> > If I did not already consider them stupid for shipping gcc "2.96", I would
> > start doing so now... *sigh*
>
> Gee you've been very easy on them. Why wait so long to come to this
> decision?
Because I use their distro only seldom. If the KDE people would use proper
C++ I'd probably have co
On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > > Redhat 7.1 should come with LyX somewhere on the CDs.
> >
> > not any more, they dropped xforms from the powertools CD due to its
> > non-free status.
>
> If I did not already consider them stupid for shipping gcc "2.96", I would
> start doing so no
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001 22:26:20 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Chris Liljenstolpe wrote:
>>
>> Has anyone compiled Lyx for MacOSX (there is X support with the new Xfree86
>> in XDarwin)?
>
>have a look at
>http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/misc/mac.html
>
>Herbert
>
You might also find the
> > Redhat 7.1 should come with LyX somewhere on the CDs.
>
> not any more, they dropped xforms from the powertools CD due to its
> non-free status.
If I did not already consider them stupid for shipping gcc "2.96", I would
start doing so now... *sigh*
That is bad news if one of the major distr
I recall a while back someone found an early post to the LyX list, looking
suspiciously like an announcement of the intended development of KDE. Here's
the confirmation of this suspicion...
http://freeos.com/articles/4070
Martin Konold reports that Mathias Etterich (these two guys thought up K
Chris Liljenstolpe wrote:
>
> Has anyone compiled Lyx for MacOSX (there is X support with the new Xfree86
> in XDarwin)?
have a look at
http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/misc/mac.html
Herbert
--
http://www.educat.hu-berlin.de/~voss/lyx/
Has anyone compiled Lyx for MacOSX (there is X support with the new Xfree86
in XDarwin)?
Chris
> The problems are:
> I downloaded the rpms from Sylvan ftp but install was not accepted due to lack
> of the Xforms.
> I also downloaded the tar.gz, but was unable to install due my lack of
> know-how, although I seemed
> to follow the correct instructions (at least I think so).
> Questions: (
someone else should answer this ...
john
- Karl Lehenbauer
Thanks for the answer, guys.
The problems are:
I downloaded the rpms from Sylvan ftp but install was not accepted due to lack
of the Xforms.
I also downloaded the tar.gz, but was unable to install due my lack of
know-how, alt
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 02:45:29PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> I guess the other one I provided earlier was old. (I hate it
> when you leave obsolete info alive on the server).
that's MUCH better than a 404. obsolete info should be labelled as such, but left
where it is...
john
--
"Vo
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 02:40:45PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> I just did a Google search and hit this page:
>
> http://www.redhat.com/products/software/linux/pl_rhl7_powertools.html
>
> It's the Powertools Package List. It lists:
I think it's out of date :
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/
John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 07:30:55PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > > I'm trying to install Lyx on my RedHat 7.1 but I'm having problems.
> >
> > Redhat 7.1 should come with LyX somewhere on the CDs.
>
> not any more, they dropped xforms from the powertools CD due to its
John Levon wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 07:30:55PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > Redhat 7.1 should come with LyX somewhere on the CDs.
>
> not any more, they dropped xforms from the powertools CD due to its
> non-free status.
I just did a Google search and hit this page:
http://www.
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 07:30:55PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > I'm trying to install Lyx on my RedHat 7.1 but I'm having problems.
>
> Redhat 7.1 should come with LyX somewhere on the CDs.
not any more, they dropped xforms from the powertools CD due to its
non-free status.
> Another optio
> I'm trying to install Lyx on my RedHat 7.1 but I'm having problems.
Redhat 7.1 should come with LyX somewhere on the CDs.
Another option is to pick an rpm from the net like
ftp://ftp.sylvan.com/pub/lyx/lyx-1.1.6fix2-1.i386.rpm
(which can be reached via the LyX homepage www.lyx.org)
Andre'
Good morning,
I'm trying to install Lyx on my RedHat 7.1 but I'm having problems.
I had Lyx in another Linux (Mandrake) pre-installed and I enjoyed very
much. and don't want
to quit. I'm just a newbie on this business.
Can anyone give me some help?
Thanks
Mário
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> > "Herbert" == Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Herbert> Michael Koundouros wrote:
> >> > > I am trying to get citation labels like [1-3,6] instead of
> >> [1,2,3,6] in lyx > > 1.16fix2c/miktex under win98. I have installed
> >> the package cite a
Rainer Dorsch wrote:
>
> > Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> > >
> > > the ieeetran.cls file is not installed on the system (debian linux) I am using
> > > lyx on. When running latex iwthout lyx, it is no problem to put the file
> > > IEEEtran.cls in the working directory. But lyx seems to have problems, wh
Michael Koundouros wrote:
>
> > > I am trying to get citation labels like [1-3,6] instead of [1,2,3,6] in
> lyx
> > > 1.16fix2c/miktex under win98. I have installed the package cite and
> added
> > > the command \usepackage{cite} in the preamble. This had no effect on the
> > > output. any ideas?
> Rainer Dorsch wrote:
> >
> > the ieeetran.cls file is not installed on the system (debian linux) I am using
> > lyx on. When running latex iwthout lyx, it is no problem to put the file
> > IEEEtran.cls in the working directory. But lyx seems to have problems, when
> > running reconfigure, I get
Rainer Dorsch wrote:
>
> the ieeetran.cls file is not installed on the system (debian linux) I am using
> lyx on. When running latex iwthout lyx, it is no problem to put the file
> IEEEtran.cls in the working directory. But lyx seems to have problems, when
> running reconfigure, I get
>
> +check
Michael Koundouros wrote:
>
> I am trying to get citation labels like [1-3,6] instead of [1,2,3,6] in lyx
> 1.16fix2c/miktex under win98. I have installed the package cite and added
> the command \usepackage{cite} in the preamble. This had no effect on the
> output. any ideas?
this is done by pa
Hi folks,
I am trying to get citation labels like [1-3,6] instead of [1,2,3,6] in lyx
1.16fix2c/miktex under win98. I have installed the package cite and added
the command \usepackage{cite} in the preamble. This had no effect on the
output. any ideas?
thanks
mike
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > I'm working with Klyx and need some help referring to the table of
> > contents. I can't find any possibility to enter something else in the toc
> > then the numbered sections, subsections and so on. But I would like to
> > place an unnumbered secti
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Claudia Urschl wrote:
> contents. I can't find any possibility to enter something else in the toc
You can use the LaTeX command
\addcontentsline{file}{sec_unit}{entry}
The \addcontentsline command adds an entry to the specified list or table
where
file is the extensi
> I'm working with Klyx and need some help referring to the table of
> contents. I can't find any possibility to enter something else in the toc
> then the numbered sections, subsections and so on. But I would like to
> place an unnumbered section too in the table of contents. Is there any
> way?
I'm working with Klyx and need some help referring to the table of
contents. I can't find any possibility to enter something else in the toc
then the numbered sections, subsections and so on. But I would like to
place an unnumbered section too in the table of contents. Is there any
way?
The edi
> Yes, exactly. I was wondering how to do that with LaTeX if not possible
> directly with LyX (as it seems).
There is no big problem to support this within LyX if you have a working
LaTeX solution and need this desperately..
Andre'
--
André Pönitz .
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 01:52:04PM +0300, Tuukka Toivonen wrote:
> > There's \widehat and there's \check but there isn't a \widecheck.
> > Is it possible to widen normal \check?
>
> What would LaTeX export look like? It does not seem supported "nativel
Hello,
the ieeetran.cls file is not installed on the system (debian linux) I am using
lyx on. When running latex iwthout lyx, it is no problem to put the file
IEEEtran.cls in the working directory. But lyx seems to have problems, when
running reconfigure, I get
+checking for document class I
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 01:52:04PM +0300, Tuukka Toivonen wrote:
> There's \widehat and there's \check but there isn't a \widecheck.
> Is it possible to widen normal \check?
What would LaTeX export look like? It does not seem supported "natively"
Andre'
--
André Pönitz
There's \widehat and there's \check but there isn't a \widecheck.
Is it possible to widen normal \check?
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> > "Jacques" == Jacques B Siboni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Jacques> Therefore lyx never gets the info that there is a dead key
> Jacques> going on. I let the OS handle it, just like on an xterm.
>
> Jacques> This is the general question with Xwindow:
"Saalfeld, Christoph" wrote:
>
> > If this means that I am using bibtex, I suppose I have to
> > specify a bibtex
> > database, but I am not aware of having created one. It just
> > seems like a huge
> > machinery to start for, say, 15 references.
>
> I've decided to use BibTeX because it makes
> If this means that I am using bibtex, I suppose I have to
> specify a bibtex
> database, but I am not aware of having created one. It just
> seems like a huge
> machinery to start for, say, 15 references.
I've decided to use BibTeX because it makes all the necessary formattings
depending on
I am not using bibtex. I am only using the "bibliography"-style available under
the "report"-class.
If this means that I am using bibtex, I suppose I have to specify a bibtex
database, but I am not aware of having created one. It just seems like a huge
machinery to start for, say, 15 references.
36 matches
Mail list logo
