Re: [LyX/master] remove most traces of boost::regex

Am Sat, 28 Nov 2020 19:29:58 +0100 (CET) schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : > commit 3093789e8d285db909a98d733e19a28f48caa7b8 > Author: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > Date: Sat Nov 28 18:26:56 2020 +0100 > > remove most traces of boost::regex > > 1/ remove boost regex code from 3rdparty/boost

Re: [RFC] Enum improvements

The first bit, involving headers, looks most useful. I agree that the first one is the most promising. Sure. But as it turns out C++ disallows forward declarations for in-class enums. So these should be moved out of classes (and most common ones maybe placed into separate headers). Anoth

Re: [LyX/master] remove most traces of boost::regex

In process of removing boost-traces from cmake-build, I got this error ... /usr2/src/lyx/lyx-git/src/support/checksum.cpp: In function ‘long unsigned int lyx::support::checksum(std::ifstream&)’: /usr2/src/lyx/lyx-git/src/support/checksum.cpp:33:8: error: ‘for_each’ was not declared in this scope

Re: DocBook milestone: most tests pass!

Am Sun, 29 Nov 2020 01:44:00 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck : > I really should use the test infrastructure more myself. Once I get back > to the macro code, I'll be in touch I would be glad to give helpful hints. Kornel pgp8s7q1DdRLW.pgp Description: Digitale Signatur von Ope

Re: [LyX/master] remove most traces of boost::regex

Am Sun, 29 Nov 2020 10:44:42 +0200 schrieb Yuriy Skalko : > > In process of removing boost-traces from cmake-build, I got this error > > ... > > /usr2/src/lyx/lyx-git/src/support/checksum.cpp: In function ‘long unsigned > > int > > lyx::support::checksum(std::ifstream&)’: > > /usr2/src/lyx/lyx-g

Build failed in Jenkins: Build branch "master" » ubuntu-latest-qt5-cmake #2352

https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-latest-qt5-cmake/2352/-- [...truncated 501 lines...] [ 5%] Generating ar/Shortcuts.lyx cd /build/lyx/build/doc && /usr/bin/cmake -DLYX_PYTHON_EXECUTABLE=/usr/bin/python -DTOP_CMAKE_PATH=/build/lyx/de

Re: [LyX/master] remove most traces of boost::regex

Am Sun, 29 Nov 2020 10:03:10 +0100 schrieb Kornel Benko : > Am Sun, 29 Nov 2020 10:44:42 +0200 > schrieb Yuriy Skalko : > > > > In process of removing boost-traces from cmake-build, I got this error > > > ... > > > /usr2/src/lyx/lyx-git/src/support/checksum.cpp: In function ‘long > > > unsigned

Build failed in Jenkins: Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended #2258

https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/2258/-- [...truncated 14 lines...] > git config remote.origin.url git://git.lyx.org/lyx.git # timeout=10 Fetching upstream changes from git://git.lyx.org/lyx.git > git fe

Re: [LyX/master] Add default TransformID enum value

Le 29 novembre 2020 00:21:04 GMT+01:00, Yuriy Skalko a écrit : >> >> What remains to be done: >> >> - remove last remnants of cmake support code in 3rdparty/boost >> >> - get rid of support/regex.h > >Done in the attached patch. > Looks good. JMarc -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended #2258

Am Sun, 29 Nov 2020 11:26:40 +0100 (CET) schrieb ci-...@inria.fr: > checking for main in -lole32... no > checking whether to use included boost library... yes > checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... /bin/grep Apparently wrong, we still allow '--with-included-boost' Kornel

Build failed in Jenkins: Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools #2057

https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools/2057/-- [...truncated 8 lines...] Cloning repository git://git.lyx.org/lyx.git > git init > >

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools #2057

Am Sun, 29 Nov 2020 17:50:36 +0100 (CET) schrieb ci-...@inria.fr: > https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools/2057/-- ... Should be fixed. Kornel pgpzRyRbJldtr.pgp Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP --

Build failed in Jenkins: Build branch "master" » ubuntu-latest-qt5-cmake #2353

https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-latest-qt5-cmake/2353/-- [...truncated 501 lines...] [ 5%] Generating ar/Shortcuts.lyx cd /build/lyx/build/doc && /usr/bin/cmake -DLYX_PYTHON_EXECUTABLE=/usr/bin/python -DTOP_CMAKE_PATH=/build/lyx/de

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools #2057

Le 29/11/2020 à 18:29, Kornel Benko a écrit : Am Sun, 29 Nov 2020 17:50:36 +0100 (CET) schrieb ci-...@inria.fr: https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools/2057/-- ... Should be fixed. Please do not fix autoconf anymo

Re: DocBook milestone: most tests pass!

On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 06:10:45AM +0100, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote: > This seems to pave the way for an ePub output :)! Thanks for you efforts Thibaut, very good job. And we are all waiting for epub of course :) Pavel -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/l

Re: LyX 2.3.6 Tarballs

On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 10:05:04AM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > >> Works well here too, I will build betainstallers tomorrow. > > > > You think we are far enough along just to make yours the official > > ones? > > > > Yes, just didn't expect it to happen in 2.3.x. > > I think

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools #2057

Am Sun, 29 Nov 2020 19:28:30 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : > Le 29/11/2020 à 18:29, Kornel Benko a écrit : > > Am Sun, 29 Nov 2020 17:50:36 +0100 (CET) > > schrieb ci-...@inria.fr: > > > >> https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools/2057/---

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended #2259

https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/2259/ -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools #2057

Le 29/11/2020 à 20:21, Kornel Benko a écrit : I have reverted your previous patches locally. We are not getting rid of boost here, only of regex. And I did not plan to make it impossible to select local boost, just not make it the default. I had the impression that regex was the only thing we n

Re: LyX 2.3.6 Tarballs

Le 27/11/2020 à 22:14, José Abílio Matos a écrit : While compiling this on F33 I noticed this warning: client.cpp:73:8: warning: type 'struct LyXRC' violates the C++ One Definition Rule [-Wodr]    73 | struct LyXRC {   |    ^ ../support/./../LyXRC.h:37:7: note: a different type i

Re: [RFC] Enum improvements

Le 29/11/2020 à 09:33, Yuriy Skalko a écrit : Another thing to look at: we have plenty of enums used a bitfields where we have defined special operators (some are mine) I only realized recently that it does not make sense. A good example is KeyModifier. I suspect that we should use 'int' instea

Re: Advanced find changes of behavior in master

Le 25/11/2020 à 15:35, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : I see a couple of changes in behavior in advanced find that can be reproduced with the Welcome.lyx file (I attached it for convenience). 1. In advanced find, put "a" in the find area and "c" in the replace area and do "Replace all". It takes a

Re: LyX 2.3.6 Tarballs

On 11/29/20 1:50 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 10:05:04AM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: Works well here too, I will build betainstallers tomorrow. You think we are far enough along just to make yours the official ones? Yes, just didn't expect it to happen

Re: LyX 2.3.6 Tarballs

On 11/28/20 10:48 AM, Yu Jin wrote: Am Sa., 28. Nov. 2020 um 16:05 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck mailto:rikih...@lyx.org>>: On 11/28/20 3:01 AM, Yu Jin wrote: Am Fr., 27. Nov. 2020 um 23:48 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck mailto:rikih...@lyx.org>>: On 11/27/20 2:09 P

Jenkins build is back to normal : Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools #2058

https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools/2058/ -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Re: Advanced find changes of behavior in master

Am Sun, 29 Nov 2020 23:04:59 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : > Le 25/11/2020 à 15:35, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > I see a couple of changes in behavior in advanced find that can be > > reproduced with the Welcome.lyx file (I attached it for convenience). > > > > 1. In advanced find, put "a

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Build branch "master" » ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools #2057

Am Sun, 29 Nov 2020 22:49:48 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : > Le 29/11/2020 à 20:21, Kornel Benko a écrit : > >> I have reverted your previous > >> patches locally. We are not getting rid of boost here, only of regex. > >> And I did not plan to make it impossible to select local boost, just

Build failed in Jenkins: Build branch "master" » ubuntu-latest-qt5-cmake #2354

https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-latest-qt5-cmake/2354/-- [...truncated 502 lines...] cd /build/lyx/build/doc && /usr/bin/cmake -DLYX_PYTHON_EXECUTABLE=/usr/bin/python -DTOP_CMAKE_PATH=/build/lyx/development/cmake -DLYX_USERDIR_VER=L

Re: Advanced find changes of behavior in master

On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 11:04:59PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 25/11/2020 à 15:35, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > I see a couple of changes in behavior in advanced find that can be > > reproduced with the Welcome.lyx file (I attached it for convenience). > > > > 1. In advanced find, put

output_docbook.cpp warnings for comparison of different signedness

I get the following warnings: /home/scott/lyxbuilds/master/repo/src/output_docbook.cpp: In function ‘void lyx::{anonymous}::makeParagraph(const lyx::Text&, const lyx::Buffer&, lyx::XMLStream&, const lyx::OutputParams&, const const_iterator&)’: /home/scott/lyxbuilds/master/repo/src/output_docbook

Re: Advanced find changes of behavior in master

On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 11:23:10PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 11:04:59PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > Le 25/11/2020 à 15:35, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > > > I see a couple of changes in behavior in advanced find that can be > > > reproduced with the Welcome.ly

Re: LyX 2.3.6 Tarballs

Am Mo., 30. Nov. 2020 um 01:18 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck < rikih...@lyx.org>: > On 11/29/20 1:50 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 10:05:04AM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > Works well here too, I will build betainstallers tomorrow. > >>> You think we