Am Montag, 10. Mai 2004 15:49 schrieb Angus Leeming:
> That said, I'm interested in how you see this all working in an ideal
> design. My picture of how this will work in the future is that we
> should separate the 'generation of the exported files' step from the
> 'export the latex to file' ste
Am Samstag, 8. Mai 2004 21:56 schrieb Helge Hafting:
> I see a problem here. What paragraph types should be selectable
> in such a document? Letters don't have sectioning, the other
> classes are almost useless without that.
The allowed types depend on the master, of course.
> Or do you propose
Am Montag, 10. Mai 2004 18:18 schrieb Gunnar G:
> Hello.
> I regret to say that I've found a bug in LyX 1.3.4 (the latest one).
> When I export the file: "Prövning.lyx" to a postscript file, I get a
file
> called "Prvvning.ps"
> The letter "ö" is missing and replaced by, something else.
>
> Not
I've just re-worked
http://www.lyx.org/about/klyx.php3
because it was feeling quite ancient. Could people please have a look
and check I've not told any lies ;-)
--
Angus
I think that this page should mention the native Aqua port and should
probably mention Ruurd's native Win32 port also. Opinions?
Objections?
--
Angus
How much sense does this make anymore now that XForms is available
under the LGPL? Does sense have anything to do with it? Do the FSF
provide advice?
Angus
What license applies to LyX?
The LyX license is the GPL version 2 or above. In addition, as a
special exception, the LyX Team gives permiss
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| How much sense does this make anymore now that XForms is available
| under the LGPL? Does sense have anything to do with it? Do the FSF
| provide advice?
>
| Angus
>
>
| What license applies to LyX?
>
| The LyX license is the GPL version 2 or above. In a
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming writes:
> | How much sense does this make anymore now that XForms is available
> | under the LGPL? Does sense have anything to do with it? Do the FSF
> | provide advice?
> We should go back to what the default GPL blurb should be without
> exceptions. (I
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> Angus Leeming writes:
>> | How much sense does this make anymore now that XForms is available
>> | under the LGPL? Does sense have anything to do with it? Do the FSF
>> | provide advice?
>
>> We should go back to what the
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Well, I'd like that too, but can we do so? IANAL and nor are you.
> | We need some informed advice IMO.
>
> GPL without the exception is what we had at the beginning... then we
> had some XForms controversy and since LyX was then written solely
> for XForms we added
I want to change the footer on the pages ... can I have write permission
on template/en/default/global/* please?
john
On Tuesday 11 May 2004 21:38, Angus Leeming wrote:
> I've just re-worked
> http://www.lyx.org/about/klyx.php3
> because it was feeling quite ancient. Could people please have a look
> and check I've not told any lies ;-)
Not anything obvious. :-)
BTW, well done. :-)
--
José Abílio
L
> What's the OS?
> What's the filesystem?
Gentoo Linux (1.4-what ever the latest version is)
ext2fs.
Sorry for the poorly written bugreport.
Hi Martin,
why have you chose SmallCaps as the font style of those character styles?
It looks funny, and usually I don't see the name of the author(s) writen
that way. :-)
I would like to change it back to normal, if you don't mind, at least for
docbook.
--
José Abílio
Gunnar G wrote:
> Hello.
> I regret to say that I've found a bug in LyX 1.3.4 (the latest one).
> When I export the file: "Prövning.lyx" to a postscript file, I get
> a file called "Prvvning.ps"
> The letter "ö" is missing and replaced by, something else.
>
> Not a major bug, but somewhat anoyi
> What do you think? Should I use the hack described above and collect
> the data in latex(), or should I do it in validate(), and how should
> I pass the files to Exporter::Export()?
However you think it should be done best.
That said, I'm interested in how you see this all working in an ideal
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 11:16:05AM +0100, Jose' Matos spake thusly:
> Hi Martin,
> why have you chose SmallCaps as the font style of those character styles?
Ah, no real reason except that this is a "person's name", like in Noun
style.
> It looks funny, and usually I don't see the n
On Tuesday 11 May 2004 14:39, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 11:16:05AM +0100, Jose' Matos spake thusly:
> > Hi Martin,
> > why have you chose SmallCaps as the font style of those character
> > styles?
>
> Ah, no real reason except that this is a "person's name", like in Noun
>
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 02:59:09PM +0100, Jose' Matos spake thusly:
> > > Hi Martin,
> > > why have you chose SmallCaps as the font style of those character
> > > styles?
> >
> > Ah, no real reason except that this is a "person's name", like in Noun
> > style.
>
> Just for curiosity, where is
On Tuesday 11 May 2004 19:13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Modified files:
> lyx-devel/lib/layouts/: db_stdtitle.inc
> lyx-devel/lib/: ChangeLog
> lyx-devel/lib/lyx2lyx/: ChangeLog lyx2lyx lyx_1_4.py
> parser_tools.py
>
> Log message:
> whitespa
On Tue, 11 May 2004, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Gunnar G wrote:
>
> > Hello.
> > I regret to say that I've found a bug in LyX 1.3.4 (the latest one).
> > When I export the file: "Prövning.lyx" to a postscript file, I get
> > a file called "Prvvning.ps"
> > The letter "ö" is missing and replaced by,
21 matches
Mail list logo
