a book of 298 pages written with 1.1.6 and a filesize of 1.9 MegaBytes
- loading in 1.1.6 takes about 6 seconds
loading with converting into 1.2.0 takes more than 3 minutes!
(Display Graphics was disabled!)
- saving and reopen the now 1.2.0 doc takes about 17 seconds
- loading another ver
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | - in 1.1.6 there is often a construct like
>
> |latex latex
>
> |latex default
>
> it is the user that has put this contruct there.
sure
>
> |which is converted into an empty ERT. it's not really
>
can somebody confirm?
a different fontsize for footnotes in the preferences has no
effect. the footnotetext has the same fontsize than the maintext.
Herbert
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Ok it seems that this patch solves the whole problem (buffer.C):
>
> @@ -388,12 +391,14 @@ bool Buffer::readLyXformat2(LyXLex & lex
>
> #ifndef NO_COMPABILITY
> void Buffer::insertErtContents(Paragraph * par, int & pos,
> - LyXFont con
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 03:12:27PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Ok it seems that this patch solves the whole problem (buffer.C):
> @@ -388,12 +391,14 @@ bool Buffer::readLyXformat2(LyXLex & lex
> void Buffer::insertErtContents(Paragraph * par, int & pos,
> - Ly
Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 03:12:27PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>>Ok it seems that this patch solves the whole problem (buffer.C):
>>@@ -388,12 +391,14 @@ bool Buffer::readLyXformat2(LyXLex & lex
>> void Buffer::insertErtContents(Paragraph * par, int & pos,
>>-
Herbert Voss wrote:
> can somebody confirm?
>
> a different fontsize for footnotes in the preferences has no
> effect. the footnotetext has the same fontsize than the maintext.
Ehm... I think that the settings for "footnote" fontsize in preferences
are not the size of the footnote text on screen
Herbert Voss wrote:
>
>
> Dekel Tsur wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 03:12:27PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >
> >>Ok it seems that this patch solves the whole problem (buffer.C):
> >>@@ -388,12 +391,14 @@ bool Buffer::readLyXformat2(LyXLex & lex
> >> void Buffer::insertErtC
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Herbert Voss wrote:
>
>>can somebody confirm?
>>
>>a different fontsize for footnotes in the preferences has no
>>effect. the footnotetext has the same fontsize than the maintext.
>>
>
> Ehm... I think that the settings for "footnote" fontsize in preferences
> are
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 12:45:57PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | a book of 298 pages written with 1.1.6 and a filesize of 1.9 MegaBytes
lots of math ?
> I guess that we will need to run a profiler to find out where we use
> all that extra time. (both above cases)
here is from my 100+ p
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 05:38:28PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | I think that this patch is wrong: The old code of insertErtContents is
> | correct, but the problem is that the wrong font is passed to it when the
> | method is called.
>
> I am not sure that I agree.
>
> | Consider the at
Herbert Voss wrote:
> sure, but in 1.1.6 it was also the fontsize for the footnotetext
>
> or am I wrong???
I think you're wrong. AFAICS from a quick test with 1.1.6, the footnote
symbol (the red "foot" of the collapsable inset) changes if you change
\footnotesize-display, but not the footnotet
John Levon wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 12:45:57PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>
>>| a book of 298 pages written with 1.1.6 and a filesize of 1.9 MegaBytes
>>
>
> lots of math ?
yes: math, floats, tables, ERT, special formatting, ...
Herbert
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 06:50:42PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | here is from my 100+ page document, mostly text + figures (not rendered).
> | It is fine ... perhaps it is a mathed thing :
>
> _and_ it makes little sense to do probiling on a binary that has not
> been compiled with full
On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 07:24:16PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> No, but with your profile it look as if it is the containers and tools
> that create the overhead. With -O2 the case is completely different,
> and "real" lyx code begin to show up.
OK, that's a good point ...
I get :
Buffe
This is as far as I got in finding the mathed bad GC problems.
Unfortunately e.g. Michael K can't reproduce it with the same compiler.
So I'm still not sure if it is compiler bug or patch bug.
Lars, Andre, please look at this patch. When I apply it to cvs from a few
days ago, lyx starts failin
On Sun, Dec 09, 2001 at 04:33:07AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Lars, Andre, please look at this patch. When I apply it to cvs from a few
> | days ago, lyx starts failing
>
> That is (at least) two patches mixed together.
I know, they are very difficult to take apart though.
> I doubt
17 matches
Mail list logo
