[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| and now you must have a look again.
Ok, this is final version. Please have a look and comment.
Unless I get objections this will go in.
? counter-2.diff
? counter-3.diff
? counter.diff
? deptherror.diff
? deptherror.lyx
? kystskipper-a-1.lyx
? m
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| Have a look.
>
| Of itself this is obviously an improvement, but I wonder if you could
| make use of BufferParams::user_defined_bullet?
Not now.
(as you can see from my comments, this has been thought of)
| I know, I'
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 01:58:13PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> >> Ok, I have a patch... not the nicest one, but it seems to work, and
>> >> I need others to thest i
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>> | Have a look.
Of itself this is obviously an improvement, but I wonder if you could
make use of BufferParams::user_defined_bullet? I know, I'm probably
shifting your goal posts.
+ string itemlabel;
+ switch (pit->itemdepth) {
+
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 01:58:13PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >> Ok, I have a patch... not the nicest one, but it seems to work, and
> >> I need others to thest it.
> >
> | You seem to have lost the 'Bibliographi
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | Initialise itemdepth when constructing it.
>> eh?
>
| Paragraph::Paragraph()
| : y(0), pimpl_(new Paragraph::Pimpl(this)), itemdepth(0)
| {}
I am only removing things... (in this part of the code), expect a
patch
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Since I am not able to compile 1.4.0cvs (hint!)
That was a stern hint. (whimper...)
Have you tried with STLport? (mr. innocent strikes again)
|, I'll ask directly:
| does the patch still allows to increase the depth of a paragraph
| to nest it
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Initialise itemdepth when constructing it.
> eh?
Paragraph::Paragraph()
: y(0), pimpl_(new Paragraph::Pimpl(this)), itemdepth(0)
{}
> | I think you should add a decent comment about itemdepth in the
> | deader file.
>
> what dead file?
s/d/h/
and no, that
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Initialise itemdepth when constructing it.
eh?
| Paragraph::Paragraph()
| : y(0), pimpl_(new Paragraph::Pimpl(this))
| {
| - enumdepth = 0;
| itemdepth = 0;
| params().clear();
| }
>
| I think you should add a decent co
Since I am not able to compile 1.4.0cvs (hint!), I'll ask directly:
does the patch still allows to increase the depth of a paragraph
to nest it inside an environment? The goal is to obtain latex code
like
\begin{theorem}
The following facts are equivalent
\begin{itemize}
\item Foo is Bar
\item Ba
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> But I am the only one able to counter your counter with a counter
> counter patch.
Don't push your luck (or give up the day job ;-)
>>> I guess ok.
> | Augh. Thanks Lars.
>
> and now you must have a look again.
Don't build in your source tree:
Index: po/POTFILES
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Hrmmpff! black-mail tactics!
>
| Hey, you started it. (Whine!)
| I counter your counter with one of my own.
But I am the only one able to counter your counter with a counter
counter patch.
>> I guess ok.
| Augh. Thanks
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Hrmmpff! black-mail tactics!
Hey, you started it. (Whine!)
I counter your counter with one of my own.
> I guess ok.
Augh. Thanks Lars.
--
Angus
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> I think I'll clean up the patch a bit and just check it in, easier
>> to get people to test it then. I tried it with the UserGuide, and
>> could not see any mistakes.
>
| So what about my lyxlib.C proposal ;-)
Hrmmpff! blac
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I think I'll clean up the patch a bit and just check it in, easier
> to get people to test it then. I tried it with the UserGuide, and
> could not see any mistakes.
So what about my lyxlib.C proposal ;-)
--
Angus
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> I think you are right, but I want to know if I got the enumdepth
>> part right, and also the resetting of the enum counters.
>
| Why not ask on the users' list? Someone is bound to have a complex
| example of this stuff.
I
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I think you are right, but I want to know if I got the enumdepth
> part right, and also the resetting of the enum counters.
Why not ask on the users' list? Someone is bound to have a complex
example of this stuff.
--
Angus
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Ok, I have a patch... not the nicest one, but it seems to work, and
>> I need others to thest it.
>
| You seem to have lost the 'Bibliographies can't have their depth
| changed' bit entirely.
Actually I think not. Now only
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Ok, I have a patch... not the nicest one, but it seems to work, and
> I need others to thest it.
You seem to have lost the 'Bibliographies can't have their depth
changed' bit entirely. Other than that the code is pretty
understandable, although I'm not a fan of those
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 11:42:22PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
>>
>> | Have a look.
>>
>> This seems to fix the problem:
>> (please verify)
>
| I think we have least two counter bugs worth testing
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 11:42:22PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
>>
>> | Have a look.
>>
>> This seems to fix the problem:
>> (please verify)
>
| I think we have least two counter bugs worth testing
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 11:42:22PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
>
> | Have a look.
>
> This seems to fix the problem:
> (please verify)
I think we have least two counter bugs worth testing against on bugzilla
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| Have a look.
This seems to fix the problem:
(please verify)
? deptherror.diff
? deptherror.lyx
? kystskipper-a-1.lyx
Index: src/text2.C
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel
Have a look.
deptherror.lyx
Description: Binary data
--
Lgb
24 matches
Mail list logo
