Hans Meine wrote:
> Yet there are autoref and cleveref.
I know. But none of them can be used as a 1:1-replacement to prettyref.
Jürgen
On Samstag 08 Dezember 2007, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> > > If so, then should we remove it?
> >
> > As I remember this, some voted for this.
>
> I disagree. I'm still using it in all my documents.
>
> > > Is there something newer and better?
> >
> > I don't know.
>
> No, there
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> > If so, then should we remove it?
>
> As I remember this, some voted for this.
I disagree. I'm still using it in all my documents.
> > Is there something newer and better?
>
> I don't know.
No, there isn't (yet). That's the problem.
Jürgen
Richard Heck schrieb:
I got many
complaints about this and we discussed this topic also on the
devel-list - the result was "it was in the end no good decision to
build in support for prettyref".
>
If so, then should we remove it?
As I remember this, some voted for this.
Is there somethin
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
(b) that to get this to do anything, you may have to "self-define"
reference formats. At least a reference to the prettyref
documentation would be worthwhile here.
I had this in in previous version, but prettyref is obsolete and not
delivered with all LaTeX-distributions any
