On Samstag 08 Dezember 2007, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Uwe Stöhr wrote: > > > If so, then should we remove it? > > > > As I remember this, some voted for this. > > I disagree. I'm still using it in all my documents. > > > > Is there something newer and better? > > > > I don't know. > > No, there isn't (yet). That's the problem.
Yet there are autoref and cleveref. I have heard that the latter should
be "better than prettyref", OTOH it seems to break some journal styles and
both are not drop-in replacements for prettyref.
Ciao, / / .o.
/--/ ..o
/ / ANS ooo
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
