> after 0.25 seconds for the first time, 0.5 seconds after the second, 1
> second after the third, and then stay at 1 second for the fourth, fifth,
> and sixth try? I can update the patch, if this change would be desired.
> I have no intuition for the cost of trying more frequently,
ce the issue
> can also compile on Windows.
>
> It seems that the risk to including the patch is that it does not fix
> the issue and actually makes the issue worse by introducing a 5 second
> delay. However, perhaps that risk is worth it.
>
> Riki, can you provide the command
The following issue seems to affect a lot of users:
https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/10091
racoon, Klaus, and Joon, can you still reproduce the issue and would you
be willing to test the binary that includes a patch for this annoying
issue?
Hi -
Of course I'm happy to test it! But I recently u
including the patch is that it does not fix
the issue and actually makes the issue worse by introducing a 5 second
delay. However, perhaps that risk is worth it.
Riki, can you provide the commands that I need to make a test binary for
Windows users? This way I can try to save you some time from creating
On Tuesday 08 May 2007 00:00:14 Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> The patch for bug 3043 pushed us forward to proper language support but
> unfortunately also introduced some bugs:
[...]
> Could anybody help me here?
What is the status here? I know that some (most) of it has been fixed...
>
The patch for bug 3043 pushed us forward to proper language support but unfortunately also
introduced some bugs:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3561
(Abdel and Jürgen had a look at this today.)
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3562
(Jürgen fixed this today.)
http
> "José" == José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
José> On Friday 16 March 2007 5:17:24 pm Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> I think as Georg (who is always right, as everybody knows by now).
José> Wise guy. :-)
José> Do you have any objection of principle to its inclusion?
No.
JMarc
On Friday 16 March 2007 5:17:24 pm Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I think as Georg (who is always right, as everybody knows by now).
Wise guy. :-)
Do you have any objection of principle to its inclusion?
If not I think it should be included.
> JMarc
--
José Abílio
>>>>> "José" == José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
José> On Thursday 15 March 2007 6:27:13 pm Georg Baum wrote:
>> The LyXLex internals were always a secret to me, so I can't say
>> much about the patch other than this: Bernhards explanation
On Thursday 15 March 2007 6:27:13 pm Georg Baum wrote:
> The LyXLex internals were always a secret to me, so I can't say much about
> the patch other than this: Bernhards explanations make sense, and it seems
> that he knows what he is talking about. Therefore this patch is OK wit
a permanent basis, so before
committing
> I would like to have their opinion on this.
The LyXLex internals were always a secret to me, so I can't say much about
the patch other than this: Bernhards explanations make sense, and it seems
that he knows what he is talking about. Therefore
On Monday 12 March 2007 3:32:55 pm Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Jose, could you put this in please?
In this case I would like to have a nod from Georg and Jean-Marc they have
worked with this code, fixing bugs on a permanent basis, so before committing
I would like to have their opinion on this.
Georg Baum wrote:
Bernhard Roider wrote:
Hello!
Here i again attached the patch for lyxlex i sent nearly two weeks ago
(and one for a superfluous space in the code). In my opinion you should
really consider to put it in because with the current version of lyxlex it
is _impossible_ to check
Bernhard Roider wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Here i again attached the patch for lyxlex i sent nearly two weeks ago
> (and one for a superfluous space in the code). In my opinion you should
> really consider to put it in because with the current version of lyxlex it
> is _impossible
Bernhard Roider wrote:
+ // do {
+ // if (c == '\\') {
+ // // escape the next char
+ // is.get(cc);
+ //
Bernhard Roider wrote:
Hello!
Here i again attached the patch for lyxlex i sent nearly two weeks ago
(and one for a superfluous space in the code). In my opinion you should
really consider to put it in because with the current version of lyxlex
it is _impossible_ to check whether reading an
PS: i made a little change compared to the recent patch such that
LyXLex::isOK() after applying the patch now behaves as it did before.
this one is the changed patch
Index: src/buffer.C
===
--- src/buffer.C(revision
Hello!
Here i again attached the patch for lyxlex i sent nearly two weeks ago (and one for a superfluous
space in the code). In my opinion you should really consider to put it in because with the current
version of lyxlex it is _impossible_ to check whether reading an integer, float
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Helge" == Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Helge> Please use this version instead, it contains the same stuff as
| Helge> well as a translated graphichs inset dialog.
>
| Lars, did you apply that before remerging? Otherwise, I'l
> "Helge" == Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Helge> Please use this version instead, it contains the same stuff as
Helge> well as a translated graphichs inset dialog.
Lars, did you apply that before remerging? Otherwise, I'll need a new patch.
JMarc
Please use this version instead, it contains the same stuff as well as
a translated graphichs inset dialog.
Helge Hafting
Index: no.po
===
RCS file: /cvs/lyx/lyx-devel/po/no.po,v
retrieving revision 1.106
diff -u -p -u -r1.106 no.po
Sorting through my old mail, I found this. It's John's patch that
uncorrected the license. Reversing this solves the problem, as neither
John nor anyone else had the legal standing to make this change.
This patch should be reversed. Note that QT/xforms is not the only
difference; the other cla
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Umph...
Applied.
--
Angus
Umph...
Index: ChangeLog
===
RCS file: /cvs/lyx/lyx-devel/po/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision 1.147
diff -u -r1.147 ChangeLog
--- ChangeLog 2003/01/30 01:30:18 1.147
+++ ChangeLog 2003/01/31 14:57:00
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2003-01-31 Alfredo
On Åroda 31 lipiec 2002 05:15 pm, Martin Vermeer wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 01:26:23PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 08:59:24PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > | + * configure.m4:
> > > | + * ui/d
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 01:48:10AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I didn't say that... do you really need me to refute all the "points
> one by one" to claim that it is not necessarily obvious...
No. OK.
regards
john
--
"The simpler it is, the harder it is."
- Tim Van Holder
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 05:19:07PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > | It's got nothing to do with any so-called "propaganda"
| >
| > You got it from some document, right?
|
| No. I provided documentary evidence that the new behaviour is
| recomme
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 01:26:23PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 08:59:24PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > | + * configure.m4:
> > | + * ui/default.ui: make math-extern a bit more visible in Edit->Math
> > | +
> > |
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 05:19:07PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | It's got nothing to do with any so-called "propaganda"
>
> You got it from some document, right?
No. I provided documentary evidence that the new behaviour is
recommended. The new behaviour is better regardless of the UI s
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| It's got nothing to do with any so-called "propaganda"
You got it from some document, right?
| I could go through again and list the exact relative advantages and
| disadvantages of the change, but frankly I'm a little tired of having to
| do that for ev
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 03:34:39PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > And I don't see what is elegant about it anyway.
>
> you've just read too much propaganda.
It's got nothing to do with any so-called "propaganda"
I could go through again and list the exact relative advantages and
disadvantages
On Wednesday 31 July 2002 3:49 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 03:04:12PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > ps, I much preferred the old, minimal menus. When I've no document open I
> > thought it was elegant to have a smaller set of menus. Progress takes
> > many strange routes it w
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 03:04:12PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> ps, I much prefered the old, minimal menus. When I've no document open I
> thought it was elegant to have a smaller set of menus. Progress takes many
> strange routes it would appear.
What price "elegance" ? A lot of stupid code
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> ps, I much prefered the old, minimal menus. When I've no
Angus> document open I thought it was elegant to have a smaller set of
Angus> menus. Progress takes many strange routes it would appear.
John did not like it, and it seems t
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 03:04:12PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Perhaps this discussion is really illustrating that we need a math-extern.ui
> and a way of adding it to the interface if the user wants it to be added.
>
> People are talking about context sensitive toolbars. Why not context
> se
On Wednesday 31 July 2002 2:45 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 02:40:10PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > > I think the math-extern stuff is targeted towards the "power user"
> > > anyway.
> >
> > So I'm not sure why it's in the menus to be honest.
>
> Because even the power user m
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 03:18:41PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > Because even the power user might neeed a reminder what is available?
>
> And they can use the docs. You have written docs, right ?
Of course not.
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 03:45:47PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > So I'm not sure why it's in the menus to be honest.
>
> Because even the power user might neeed a reminder what is available?
And they can use the docs. You have written docs, right ?
:P
john
--
"The simpler it is, the harde
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 02:40:10PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > I think the math-extern stuff is targeted towards the "power user" anyway.
>
> So I'm not sure why it's in the menus to be honest.
Because even the power user might neeed a reminder what is available?
Andre'
--
Those who desire t
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 12:55:35PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Why? I thought '...' was standard to indicate a submenu? Oh... maybe I
> mixed this up with a sub dialog...
It's neither - it's "further interaction needed before completion".
> I have no problem naming it. It's a CAS ;-}
"Comput
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 02:05:55PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | No, it was not \emptyset, it was the slashed O, which seem to be quite
> | different.
>
> But I am pretty sure that was the intention.
Hm. I could bind M-m / O to insert an \emptyset. Or even use that half-baked
auto-correc
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 08:59:24PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | + * configure.m4:
>> | + * ui/default.ui: make math-extern a bit more visible in Edit->Math
>> | +
>> | + * bind/math.bind: rem
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> Fine. Herbert complains about things not reachable by menus,
Andre> you complain the other way round.
Andre> So please make your minds up and come back if you reach
Andre> consensus. _I_ really don't care.
OK, OK, leave it here.
On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 08:59:24PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | + * configure.m4:
> | + * ui/default.ui: make math-extern a bit more visible in Edit->Math
> | +
> | + * bind/math.bind: remove some strange bindings for Ø and Å
>
> Empty
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 01:06:54PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >> Then you could have a menu entry like "Simplify expression".
>
> Andre> I think the math-extern stuff is targeted towards the "power
> Andre> user" anyway. So this is not the usual context where guessing
> Andre> intention
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| + * configure.m4:
| + * ui/default.ui: make math-extern a bit more visible in Edit->Math
| +
| + * bind/math.bind: remove some strange bindings for Ø and Å
Empty-set and Ångstrøm.
--
Lgb
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> E.g. Maple and octave are so different that putting them behind
Andre> a common interface does not make much sense to me. Even if this
Andre> were sensible we would have to hard-code "equivalents" like
Andre> Maple's 'factor' and M
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 12:23:24PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> So what to you suggest instead?
>
> Maybe "Symbolic computations", but this is not very good either. Note
> that you should remove the "..." anyway.
Why? I thought '...' was standard to indicate a submenu? Oh... maybe
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 12:14:12PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Andre> wrote: I thought I attached it...
>> + Submenu "Call external CAS...|t" "edit_math_extern"
>>
>> Personally, this makes no sense to me. I do not know (and do n
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 12:14:12PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> I thought I attached it...
>
> + Submenu "Call external CAS...|t" "edit_math_extern"
>
> Personally, this makes no sense to me. I do not know (and do not want
> to know) what a CAS is.
A computer algebra system w
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> I thought I attached it...
+ Submenu "Call external CAS...|t" "edit_math_extern"
Personally, this makes no sense to me. I do not know (and do not want
to know) what a CAS is.
JMarc
I thought I attached it...
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Index: ChangeLog
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/lib/Chang
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 03:05:46PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> (and "POD const v" in a argument list is always a bug)
It certainly is a pain for no good reason in the .h.
I have seen coding guidelines requiring in the .C, though.
Not that I am very fond of it... Actually I can live with
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 02:04:55PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | What about applying the patch first and do the political bits later?
>
> because it is nearly impossible to make people do thing later. The
> best time to fix a patch really well, it before it is appli
;
> can't we do with just lyx::pos_type?
We can.
What about applying the patch first and do the political bits later?
> space_inserted = true;
> } else {
> - const Paragraph::size_type nb = 8 - pos % 8;
>>>>> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> It compiles again but I am notoriously bad at fixing merging
Andre> conflicts.
Andre> Please apply the uncontroversial parts.
I applied the parts which are not related to Paragraph::pos_ty
It compiles again but I am notoriously bad at fixing merging conflicts.
Please apply the uncontroversial parts.
Andre'
--
André Pönitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
src3.diff.gz
Description: application/gunzip
Hi,
sorry, I noticed that the patch mail was pretty long after having sent it.
But would I have had another option? Can I upload a patch somewhere to have
it checked and commited?
Kalle
--
Matthias Kalle Dalheimer
President & CEO/VD
Klarälvdalens Datakonsult AB
Fax +46-563-540028
E
I forgot the patch.
--
Baruch Even
http://techst02.technion.ac.il/~sbaruch/ (My Site)
http://rpghost.com/jindor/ (My brothers AD&D site)
" Learn to laugh ... it's the path to true love! "
- The Angel in the movie Michael
patch.gz
59 matches
Mail list logo
