Martin Vermeer wrote:
> Of course it might be that an added became superfluous
> again by a later added one... I did not go back to check that (Would
> Angus have a script for that?).
Every header file should be able to be compiled on its own. I do have
a script to check that. Doing so (after up
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Did you fix all the problems in one go, or did you try to recompile
> in between.
> My method was to begin a recombile everytime i added a
It really doesn't matter though does it? Any file with a std::string
arg needs to know what std::string is. I won't waste too mu
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| In other words, a legal implementation can require #include
| throughout?
Yes.
--
Lgb
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 09:43:55AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly:
>
> Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | The message is the following:
> >
> | In file included from math_macrotable.C:13:
> | math_macrotable.h:26: `string' undeclared in namespace `_STL'
>
> Yes... but this i
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 06:32:29AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly:
>> To: Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: std::string pathc
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 06:32:29AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly:
> To: Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: std::string pathc
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes)
> Organization: LyX Developer http://www.lyx.org/
>
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| rest of the evening... here's the patch needed for STLport. Feel free
| to commit, I'm hitting the sack.
Do you really need in all those places? You seem to add it in
more places than I removed "support/std_string.h"
But it shouldn't really matter...
Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Thanks...
Early bird get the ...
| when you did this I pretty much knew how I would spend the
| rest of the evening... here's the patch needed for STLport. Feel free
| to commit, I'm hitting the sack.
>
| And *please* Lars, don't do anything yucky bef
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 04:45:30PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes spake thusly:
>
>
> Ok if I commit this now?
>
> --
> Lgb
Thanks... when you did this I pretty much knew how I would spend the
rest of the evening... here's the patch needed for STLport. Feel free
to commit, I'm hitting the sa
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> I am not quite sure what you are refering to, only find a
Lars> Solaris note about lyxstring might be needed. I just removed
Lars> that.
Lars> Did you have other changes in mind?
Well, I would have bet that we did mention --wi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
| | Lars> Ok if I commit this now?
>>
| | Yes. Did you remember to modify INSTALL?
>
| No.
>
| I'll have a look at it now.
I am
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> Ok if I commit this now?
>
| Yes. Did you remember to modify INSTALL?
No.
I'll have a look at it now.
--
Lgb
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Ok if I commit this now?
Yes. Did you remember to modify INSTALL?
JMarc
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 04:45:30PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> Ok if I commit this now?
Just do it...
Andre'
Ok if I commit this now?
--
Lgb
15 matches
Mail list logo