Andrew Corrigan wrote:
> I can look into this more in two weeks (after
> qualifiers) if it would still be helpful at that point.
Andrew,
did you find some time to look at the layout?
Jürgen
Andrew Corrigan wrote:
> I tried using the layout file you posted and so far it works great. I'll
> report back if I experience any issues. If you can use redefinitions so
> that it uses 'thm' instead of 'theorem', which I think was an intentional
> change to make it work with the SIAM document
Hi Jürgen,
In response to your message on: 2008-06-01:
I tried using the layout file you posted and so far it works great. I'll
report back if I experience any issues. If you can use redefinitions so
that it uses 'thm' instead of 'theorem', which I think was an intentional
change to make it wor
Andrew Corrigan wrote:
> Based on the AMS layout files, I hacked together SIAM layout files which
> work for me. This is my first time ever making layout files, so I may have
> done it wrong. Anyway, I posted the layout files at:
> http://cds.gmu.edu/~acorriga/lyx/siamltex
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> "The original maintainer" just informed me that she abstains from voting
> in this matter (as in "I don't care, they should do whatever they want.")
OK, that's what I wanted to hear.
> So from what I can tell, Andrew's proposal does make sense.
Good. I'll have a look at it
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 05:58:24PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Andrew Corrigan wrote:
> > I didn't try contacting the original author directly. The only
> > communication I've made regarding the original SIAM layout file was
> > in the mailing list post linke
Andrew Corrigan wrote:
> I didn't try contacting the original author directly. The only
> communication I've made regarding the original SIAM layout file was in the
> mailing list post linked below when I pointed out back in November that the
> SIAM layout file does not work
Hi Jürgen,
I didn't try contacting the original author directly. The only
communication I've made regarding the original SIAM layout file was in the
mailing list post linked below when I pointed out back in November that the
SIAM layout file does not work. I want to point add that
Andrew Corrigan wrote:
> I encountered quite a few problems using the SIAM layout.
> 1. It didn't show theorem numbers in Lyx, just a #.
> 2. Converting an AMS article to a SIAM article did not work.
> 3. It didn't output LaTeX correctly
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[
I encountered quite a few problems using the SIAM layout.
1. It didn't show theorem numbers in Lyx, just a #.
2. Converting an AMS article to a SIAM article did not work.
3. It didn't output LaTeX correctly
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg59971.html
Based on the AMS la
10 matches
Mail list logo
