Re: seminar.layout and lyx-devel

2005-05-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>>>>> "Staffan" == Staffan Ringbom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Staffan> Hello, Seems like the seminar.layout would not be updated and Staffan> I suspect an error in the seminar.layout. When I try to Staffan> reconfigure a document to seminar I get an error

seminar.layout and lyx-devel

2005-03-23 Thread Staffan Ringbom
Hello, Seems like the seminar.layout would not be updated and I suspect an error in the seminar.layout. When I try to reconfigure a document to seminar I get an error message Error reading `~/.lyx-cvs/layouts/seminar.layout' (Check 'seminar') Thank you very much, Staffan Ringbo

Re: new versions of seminar.layout and dinbrief.layout

2003-12-22 Thread Christian Ridderström
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Günter Milde wrote: > Also, it would be nice to have the Contributed Stuff page > http://www.lyx.org/download/contrib.php3 > updated with a link from "Additional layout files" to the layout wiki. I've attached a patch with changes the text so that it refers to the wiki-wi

Re: new versions of seminar.layout and dinbrief.layout

2003-12-19 Thread Jose' Matos
On Friday 19 December 2003 09:30, Günter Milde wrote: > > For backwards compatibility, the name "Environment" should be kept for > the InEnvironment and a new one (ContainerEnvironment?, > EnvironmentParagraph?, ...) found for the "tru" environment type. You can make that isEnvironment obs

new versions of seminar.layout and dinbrief.layout

2003-12-19 Thread Günter Milde
I did a review/update of my seminar.layout and the dinbrief.layout. Both are now at the LyX layout wiki http://wiki.lyx.org/pmwiki.php/Layouts/Layouts. I would be happy to see them included into the "mainstream" lyx. Also, it would be nice to have the Contributed Stuff page http://w

Re: Re: seminar.layout doesn't work as expected

2002-08-01 Thread Guenter Milde
On 30 Jul 2002 10:37:28 +0200 wrote Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 17 Jul 2002 11:33:15 -0400 wrote German Poo Caaman~o > >> Since lyx-1.1.6-fix (AFAIR) I've been having some problems with > >> seminar.layout. I defined frames on my slides,

Re: seminar.layout

2001-02-06 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> My problem is not really the new seminar layout but the that it Lars> is introduced in 1.1.6fixX Agreed. Lars> IMO _no_ development should be done for 1.1.6, no code, no Lars> features, no enhanced layouts. _only_ bugfixing.

Re: seminar.layout

2001-02-05 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
but the slides stayed unchanged through 1.1.6. | The problem of converting from old to new slides.layout, | is the same as the problem for converting new to newer seminar.layout. My problem is not really the new seminar layout but the that it is introduced in 1.1.6fixX I'd like it a lot more if t

Re: seminar.layout

2001-02-05 Thread Dekel Tsur
; | It is better sooner than later (so fewer people will have documents with the > | old layout). > > And what then about the even newer and better layout in 1.2.x? Then you will also have a new slides.layout. The problem of converting from old to new slides.layout, is the same as the problem for converting new to newer seminar.layout.

Re: seminar.layout

2001-02-05 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 09:31:34PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > | > And why isn't it soon enough to provide this in 1.2.x? | | It is better sooner than later (so fewer people will have documents with the | old layout). And what then about the e

Re: seminar.layout

2001-02-05 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 09:31:34PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > And why isn't it soon enough to provide this in 1.2.x? It is better sooner than later (so fewer people will have documents with the old layout).

Re: seminar.layout

2001-02-05 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 12:46:25PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > | | > | If there are no objections, I will put my new layout in CVS (HEAD and 1.1.6). | > | > Why in 1.1.6? Is it backwards compabible with the old lyout? | | Because the current l

Re: seminar.layout

2001-02-05 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 12:46:25PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | > | If there are no objections, I will put my new layout in CVS (HEAD and 1.1.6). > > Why in 1.1.6? Is it backwards compabible with the old lyout? Because the current layout is very hard to use, and we should provide a bet

Re: seminar.layout

2001-02-05 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 08:59:03PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote: | > The current layout file for the seminar class is very awkward to use: | > 1. A comment paragraph is needed between every two slides | > 2. It is hard to put slide headings (they need to be nes

Re: seminar.layout

2001-02-03 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 08:59:03PM +0200, Dekel Tsur wrote: > The current layout file for the seminar class is very awkward to use: > 1. A comment paragraph is needed between every two slides > 2. It is hard to put slide headings (they need to be nested) > > I've tried to make a better layout fil

Re: seminar.layout

2001-01-12 Thread hawk
John jumbled, > On Wed, Jan 10, 2001 at 01:26:25PM -0500, hawk wrote: > > I've never been able to get this one to work, eiher way. I've > > always ended up giving them to secretaries to separate the > > slides and notes :) > Well, it *used* to work a couple of years ago. Don't know what's >

Re: seminar.layout

2001-01-09 Thread John Weiss
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 12:16:08AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > but note that slides is also lacking a lot and that is because of > lacking featrues in LyX. In fact, when I last tried to use "slides" in LyX, the "\onlyslide" and "\onlynote" features of "slides.cls" flat-out refused to work

Re: seminar.layout

2001-01-07 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 12:16:08AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj&resh;nnes wrote: > Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | > I'd rather enhance lyx to give better support for these kinds of > | > documentclasses. > | > | But how much time this will take ? > > The NEW_INSETS will pave the way for thi

Re: seminar.layout

2001-01-06 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | I've tried to make a better layout file by using the same hack used in | > | slides.layout. When I wrote seminar.layout it was just to show that seminar could also be used with LyX, I didn't put much effort in and actually hope

Re: seminar.layout

2001-01-06 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 09:17:55PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj&resh;nnes wrote: > Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | The current layout file for the seminar class is very awkward to use: > | 1. A comment paragraph is needed between every two slides > | 2. It is hard to put slide headings (the

Re: seminar.layout

2001-01-06 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | The current layout file for the seminar class is very awkward to use: | 1. A comment paragraph is needed between every two slides | 2. It is hard to put slide headings (they need to be nested) | | I've tried to make a better layout file by using the same

seminar.layout

2001-01-05 Thread Dekel Tsur
The current layout file for the seminar class is very awkward to use: 1. A comment paragraph is needed between every two slides 2. It is hard to put slide headings (they need to be nested) I've tried to make a better layout file by using the same hack used in slides.layout. However, the new layou

Re: seminar.layout

2000-03-06 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Larry Marso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Incorporation of this package would be *much* appreciated here. | | On Fri, Mar 03, 2000 at 07:49:07PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > | > I had a quick look at this class and realized that to support this is | > LyX is very _easy_, albeit _very_

Re: seminar.layout

2000-03-05 Thread Larry Marso
Incorporation of this package would be *much* appreciated here. On Fri, Mar 03, 2000 at 07:49:07PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > > I had a quick look at this class and realized that to support this is > LyX is very _easy_, albeit _very_ simple support.

seminar.layout

2000-03-03 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
I had a quick look at this class and realized that to support this is LyX is very _easy_, albeit _very_ simple support. The seminar class is in effect just a article class with two environments added: slide and slide* (Landscape and Portrait slides) To make a simple text slide in latex you do: