>> I do not think we should hardcode such tricks. So either Uwe's
>> proposed change is OK for everybody, or we stick to the old one and
>> joost sets the format he wants in lyxrc.dist.
> Well, then I think that "%A, %d %B %Y" is much better than "%x".
My solution is not perfect because "%A, %d
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 09:34:41AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Enrico> On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 11:14:49PM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> >> I don't like the change made in
> >> http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/15545 and
> >>
> "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Enrico> On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 11:14:49PM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>> I don't like the change made in
>> http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/15545 and
>> http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/15546 as this destroys the date
>> formatting.
>
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 11:14:49PM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> I don't like the change made in
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/15545
> and
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/15546
> as this destroys the date formatting.
>
> Using
> %A, %d %B %Y"
> instead of
> %A, %e %B %Y"
> fixes the crash r
I don't like the change made in
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/15545
and
http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/15546
as this destroys the date formatting.
Using
%A, %d %B %Y"
instead of
%A, %e %B %Y"
fixes the crash reported in bug 2839
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2839
and keeps the da
