Re: relyx & bugzilla

2002-05-02 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 09:40:59AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > What do yo mean by "native"? Inside the lyx binary? Well, at least C++ and re-using parts of the current math parser for tokenization and such. > I think that would be a wrong move. IMHO an external program works just > fine

Re: relyx & bugzilla

2002-05-02 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 09:12:51AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> | So, should I mass-WONTFIX relyx bugs Lars ? >> >> if we cannot hoax anyone to at least work on one og the bugs... > | I think I'll have a look at a "native .tex parser" for LyX i

Re: relyx & bugzilla

2002-05-02 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 09:12:51AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | So, should I mass-WONTFIX relyx bugs Lars ? > > if we cannot hoax anyone to at least work on one og the bugs... I think I'll have a look at a "native .tex parser" for LyX in the 1.3.0 series. So WONTFIX would not be the wor

Re: relyx & bugzilla

2002-05-01 Thread John Levon
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 10:05:08AM +0200, Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen wrote: > - If it is not realistic that a bug will be fixed within a reasonable > time-frame, mark it as "LATER" or "REMIND". For a bugzilla as small as LyX's, I'd be happy with resolving as LATER where appropriate, although thi

Re: relyx & bugzilla

2002-05-01 Thread John Levon
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 12:15:28AM -0700, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote: > > if we cannot hoax anyone to at least work on one og the bugs... > > You can go ahead and assign a few to me. I won't get it done > for a week or two, but I will get it done. I've assigned them all to you. Don't worry it doesn

Re: relyx & bugzilla

2002-05-01 Thread Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen
On Wed, 1 May 2002, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote: > > | So, should I mass-WONTFIX relyx bugs Lars ? > > > > if we cannot hoax anyone to at least work on one og the bugs... > > You can go ahead and assign a few to me. I won't get it done > for a week or two, but I will get it done. We do this in our us

Re: relyx & bugzilla

2002-04-30 Thread Kayvan A. Sylvan
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 09:12:51AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | So, should I mass-WONTFIX relyx bugs Lars ? > > if we cannot hoax anyone to at least work on one og the bugs... > You can go ahead and assign a few to me. I won't get it done for

Re: relyx & bugzilla

2002-04-30 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | So, should I mass-WONTFIX relyx bugs Lars ? if we cannot hoax anyone to at least work on one og the bugs... -- Lgb

relyx & bugzilla

2002-04-30 Thread John Levon
So, should I mass-WONTFIX relyx bugs Lars ? john -- "Please let's not resume the argument with the usual whining about how this feature will wipe out humanity or bring us to the promised land." - Charles Campbell on magic words in Subject: headers