Am Mittwoch, 4. Mai 2011 schrieb Uwe Stöhr:
> Am 04.05.2011 02:10, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
>
> > What is the reason you still use scons ?
>
> Because it works ;-).
> I also have CMake but cannot see any difference in the compiling speed
> between CMake and SCons.
> SCons has the advanta
Am 04.05.2011 02:10, schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
What is the reason you still use scons ?
Because it works ;-).
I also have CMake but cannot see any difference in the compiling speed between CMake and SCons.
SCons has the advantage that I can also remerge po-files. Maybe that is now also
Uwe.
What is the reason you still use scons ?
Vincent
Op 4 mei 2011 02:05 schreef het volgende:
> Author: uwestoehr
> Date: Wed May 4 02:05:39 2011
> New Revision: 38577
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/38577
>
> Log:
> scons/SConstruct: fix SCons
>
> Modified:
> lyx-devel/trunk/developm
