On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> > I'm not sure we should backport this to branch. There will (most
>> > probably) be one release in that series anyway.
>>
>> i have the same feeling. if we introduce regressions, theres no much space
>> to repair
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > I'm not sure we should backport this to branch. There will (most
> > probably) be one release in that series anyway.
>
> i have the same feeling. if we introduce regressions, theres no much space
> to repair it back.
Also it seems not of much use. AFAIU the reasoning was t
Patrick Atamaniuk wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>
> >> 2nd try attached, sorry for the mess.
> >
> > control check:
> > when you build lyx with this patch and save new file, what the first
> > line of the file?
>
> I double checked - with the latter patch we get:
>
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Patrick Atamaniuk wrote:
> > > #LyX 1.6 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/
> >
> > for the 1.6.9 backport that is. for trunk, i see config.h with correct
> > integers 2 and 0.
>
> I'm not sure we should backport this to branch. There will (most pr
Patrick Atamaniuk wrote:
> > #LyX 1.6 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/
>
> for the 1.6.9 backport that is. for trunk, i see config.h with correct
> integers 2 and 0.
I'm not sure we should backport this to branch. There will (most probably) be
one release in that series a
> #LyX 1.6 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/
for the 1.6.9 backport that is. for trunk, i see config.h with correct
integers 2 and 0.
/p
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> 2nd try attached, sorry for the mess.
>
> control check:
> when you build lyx with this patch and save new file, what the first
> line of the file?
I double checked - with the latter patch we get:
#LyX 1.6 created this file. For more info se
Patrick Atamaniuk wrote:
> > Here we go, quickfix against svn trunk for scons attached.
> Which is erroneous, i missed that we need const int. Please scrap that
> last patch from me.
>
> 2nd try attached, sorry for the mess.
control check:
when you build lyx with this patch and save new file, wha
> Here we go, quickfix against svn trunk for scons attached.
Which is erroneous, i missed that we need const int. Please scrap that
last patch from me.
2nd try attached, sorry for the mess.
/patrick
Index: SConstruct
===
--- SConstru
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> kor...@lyx.org wrote:
>> +#define LYX_MAJOR_VERSION ${LYX_MAJOR_VERSION}
>> +#define LYX_MINOR_VERSION ${LYX_MINOR_VERSION}
>
> huh, this didn't come to my mind. now i think scons will suffer from the same
> problem.
> please is there anybody
kor...@lyx.org wrote:
> Author: kornel
> Date: Thu Feb 10 07:16:12 2011
> New Revision: 37580
> URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/37580
>
> Log:
> Define LYX_(MAJOR|MINOR)_VERSION also for cmake build
>
> Modified:
>lyx-devel/trunk/development/cmake/config.h.cmake
>
> Modified: lyx-deve
11 matches
Mail list logo
