Pavel Sanda wrote:
> so ok, what about when the 'run' version launches compare dialog, but starts
> comparison immediately?
but then Abdels vision of lyx -compare 437 444 file.lyx is not possible :(
pavel
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
> >> >maybe some panel like "[x] Skip internal VCS handling" and let user
> >> >define check/in-out, log history in edit fields. problems -
> >>
> >> >there is no way how to define lyxvc().inUse,
> >>
> >> Why not ?
> >
> >if you want to introduce support for
>> I meant, why do you want to retrieve the revision number of the
>> current file, which you use in the call to svn cat. I guess that if
>> you call svn cat without a revision number, it will get the last
version. Or not ?
>
>but we want much more than the last version. inside we always call sv
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
but we want much more than the last version.
>>>
>>> I am not sure we really want that actually... at least I am not sure...
>>> I'd
>>> rather rely on svn or Tortoisesvn ui capabilities and diff scripting
>>> instead.
>>
>> tortoise is not limited to windows?
>
> Und
On 02/24/2010 09:33 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
but we want much more than the last version.
I am not sure we really want that actually... at least I am not sure... I'd
rather rely on svn or Tortoisesvn ui capabilities and diff scripting
instead.
tortoise is not limited t
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>> but we want much more than the last version.
>
> I am not sure we really want that actually... at least I am not sure... I'd
> rather rely on svn or Tortoisesvn ui capabilities and diff scripting
> instead.
tortoise is not limited to windows?
> What we really need is
On 02/24/2010 04:55 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
Why do you need the revision number for revision 0 ?
the idea was that user would be able to address revisions not only by
absolute revision number but also in relative manner, ie to let him
ad
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
> >> Why do you need the revision number for revision 0 ?
> >
> >the idea was that user would be able to address revisions not only by
> >absolute revision number but also in relative manner, ie to let him
> address
> >revisions like -5 for five revisions back.
>> Why do you need the revision number for revision 0 ?
>
>the idea was that user would be able to address revisions not only by
>absolute revision number but also in relative manner, ie to let him
address
>revisions like -5 for five revisions back. naturally 0 happens to be
the last
>commit.
I
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> Why do you need the revision number for revision 0 ?
the idea was that user would be able to address revisions not only by absolute
revision number but also in relative manner, ie to let him address revisions
like -5 for five revisions back. naturally 0 happens to
sa...@lyx.org schreef:
Author: sanda
Date: Mon Feb 15 08:10:59 2010
New Revision: 33474
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/33474
-bool SVN::prepareFileRevision(int rev, string & f)
+bool SVN::prepareFileRevision(string const & revis, string & f)
{
+ if (!isStrInt(revis))
+
11 matches
Mail list logo
