Re: pspell.m4 again

2003-03-11 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 09:06:26AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: | | > Are we using pspell or aspell? | > | > If pspell is just a compability wrapper why are we using it? | | I've already explained this. It's so things work with the original | libpsp

Re: pspell.m4 again

2003-03-11 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 09:06:26AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: > Are we using pspell or aspell? > > If pspell is just a compability wrapper why are we using it? I've already explained this. It's so things work with the original libpspell AND the new libaspell (the latter via libpspell comp

Re: pspell.m4 yet again

2003-03-11 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
"Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Would this work? | | AC_CHECK_LIB(pspell, new_pspell_config, break, USE_PSPELL=no) | if test "$USE_PSPELL" = "no" ; then | AC_CHECK_LIB(aspell, new_aspell_config, break, USE_PSPELL=no) | fi | I don't really understand

Re: pspell.m4 again

2003-03-11 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
ent, the current pspell.m4 | is still confused and fails, saying that I do not have lpspell, but the | final message below says Configuration was successful. | Configuration | Host type: i586-pc-linux-gnu | Special build flags:warnings assertions use-pspell

Re: pspell.m4

2003-03-06 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: John> On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 09:12:30PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes John> wrote: >> Not mine. >> >> pspell-devel-0.12.2-14 pspell-0.12.2-14 aspell-de-0.1.1-15 >> aspell-no-0.3-4 aspell-0.33.7.1-16 aspell-en-gb-0.33.7.1-16 >> aspell-devel-0.33

Re: pspell.m4

2003-03-05 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 09:12:30PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: | | > Not mine. | > | > pspell-devel-0.12.2-14 | > pspell-0.12.2-14 | > aspell-de-0.1.1-15 | > aspell-no-0.3-4 | > aspell-0.33.7.1-16 | > aspell-en-gb-0.33.7.1-16 | > aspell-devel-0.33.7

Re: pspell.m4

2003-03-05 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 09:12:30PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: > Not mine. > > pspell-devel-0.12.2-14 > pspell-0.12.2-14 > aspell-de-0.1.1-15 > aspell-no-0.3-4 > aspell-0.33.7.1-16 > aspell-en-gb-0.33.7.1-16 > aspell-devel-0.33.7.1-16 > > I obviously need some help here to do the right thi

Re: pspell.m4

2003-03-05 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 03:51:39PM -0400, Garst R. Reese wrote: | | > Looking at pspell/pspell.h I see | > #define delete_pspell_config delete_aspell_config | | Lars goofed here. libpspell is a compatability lib, and should work on | any version of aspell

Re: pspell.m4

2003-03-05 Thread John Levon
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 03:51:39PM -0400, Garst R. Reese wrote: > Looking at pspell/pspell.h I see > #define delete_pspell_config delete_aspell_config Lars goofed here. libpspell is a compatability lib, and should work on any version of aspell from when libpspell was introduceed, up to current. B

Re: new pspell.m4, and other problems.

2002-06-02 Thread John Levon
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 03:38:28AM +0100, John Levon wrote: > > It failed to find my pspell libs. > > I didn't change this, isn't it still broken like it was ? Argh, sorry, accidental commit. > I'll commit a fix for this soon. Commited, please autogen.sh and try again ... john -- "Do you m

Re: new pspell.m4, and other problems.

2002-06-02 Thread John Levon
On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 11:29:24PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: > It failed to find my pspell libs. I didn't change this, isn't it still broken like it was ? > ** Cannot find flimage.h. Please check that the forms library >is correctly installed on your system. I'll commit a fix for this s

Re: PATCH pspell.m4

2002-05-22 Thread John Levon
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 10:15:32PM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: > Attached is the minimalist patch with .la added. If you want to try one > with AC_CHECK, feel free. I suppose the difference is that that check > would not add the -L/usr/local/lib which appears to be redundant. Actually it's down

Re: PATCH pspell.m4

2002-05-22 Thread John Levon
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 07:00:06AM -0300, Garst R. Reese wrote: > I don't know what function(s) to check the lib for, so that would have > to come from Kevin or someone else who would know just what to do. Just check for "main" as the function - this is special name > > perhaps .la .so .a then.

Re: PATCH pspell.m4

2002-05-16 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
ave a libtool >> lib? >> >> I wonder why pspell.m4 does not use the regular machinery for finding >> libraries and header files. >> | I also have a libpspell.la. I have not a clue what the "regular | machinery" would be, AC_CHECK_LIB f.ex. | but

Re: PATCH pspell.m4

2002-05-15 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
"Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | "Garst R. Reese" wrote: | Oops, the ChangeLog was too incomplete | ChangeLog | 2002-05-15 Garst Reese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | * fix pspell.m4 c&p boo boo | * fix pspell.m4 to work with .so as w

Re: PATCH pspell.m4

2002-05-15 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
"Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | ChangeLog | 2002-05-15 Garst Reese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | * fix c&p boo boo | * fix to work with .so as well as .a or both.--- pspell.m4.save Wed May 15 |17:54:20 2002 | +++ pspell.m4 Wed May 15 20:49: