Re: preview-latex is go!

2002-06-27 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 02:03:49PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > It is quite more than a factor of 10, and we don't have corporate > sponsors for developer meetings and similar. For that reasons, > demands that we should > > a) develop and code interfaces according to LyX developers' specs > and

Re: preview-latex is go!

2002-06-27 Thread David Kastrup
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 01:10:28PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > > As I already said: we will welcome developers willing to > > participate in making dvipng support more functionality. > > You are searching in the wrong place. I, for instance, have som

Re: preview-latex is go!

2002-06-27 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 01:10:28PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > As I already said: we will welcome developers willing to participate > in making dvipng support more functionality. You are searching in the wrong place. I, for instance, have some religious aversion against using C when C++ could b

Re: preview-latex is go!

2002-06-27 Thread David Kastrup
Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 10:17:56AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > > > > Sure thing. Check out dvipng from the preview-latex CVS: antialiased > > > > bitmaps which you can request in daemon mode (page selection and > > > > stuff via pipe instead of command

Re: preview-latex is go!

2002-06-27 Thread Dekel Tsur
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 10:17:56AM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > > > Sure thing. Check out dvipng from the preview-latex CVS: antialiased > > > bitmaps which you can request in daemon mode (page selection and > > > stuff via pipe instead of command line). That should be hellishly > > > fast. I'

Re: preview-latex is go!

2002-06-26 Thread David Kastrup
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wednesday 26 June 2002 10:52 am, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 08:56:41AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > > > Sure thing. Check out dvipng from the preview-latex CVS: antialiased > > > > bitmaps which you can request in daemon mod

Re: preview-latex is go!

2002-06-26 Thread David Kastrup
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 08:56:41AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > > Sure thing. Check out dvipng from the preview-latex CVS: > > > antialiased bitmaps which you can request in daemon mode (page > > > selection and stuff via pipe instead of command li

Re: preview-latex is go!

2002-06-26 Thread Angus Leeming
On Wednesday 26 June 2002 10:52 am, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 08:56:41AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > > Sure thing. Check out dvipng from the preview-latex CVS: antialiased > > > bitmaps which you can request in daemon mode (page selection and > > > stuff via pipe instead

Re: preview-latex is go!

2002-06-26 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 08:56:41AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > Sure thing. Check out dvipng from the preview-latex CVS: antialiased > > bitmaps which you can request in daemon mode (page selection and > > stuff via pipe instead of command line). That should be hellishly > > fast. I'll get b

Re: preview-latex is go!

2002-06-26 Thread David Kastrup
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't anticipate adding png support to xforms will be t > hard. What may be harder is getting it into a released version of > the library, judging from the current lack of response to other > patches I've thrown their way. Toolkit independence is

Re: preview-latex is go!

2002-06-26 Thread Angus Leeming
On Wednesday 26 June 2002 9:17 am, David Kastrup wrote: > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Tuesday 25 June 2002 10:21 pm, David Kastrup wrote: > > > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 06:15:57PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > > > > > Considerin

Re: preview-latex is go!

2002-06-26 Thread David Kastrup
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tuesday 25 June 2002 10:21 pm, David Kastrup wrote: > > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 06:15:57PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > > > > Considering the title of this thread and my complete lack of knowledge > >

Re: preview-latex is go!

2002-06-26 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 25 June 2002 10:21 pm, David Kastrup wrote: > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 06:15:57PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > > > Considering the title of this thread and my complete lack of knowledge > > > what this might be about, do you consider it like

Re: preview-latex is go!

2002-06-25 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 25 June 2002 5:40 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 05:06:39PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > When you do, I wonder if you can think of a way of doing things a little > > better ;-) > > I think parts of the code for the spalsh screen could be factored out into > a re-u

Re: preview-latex is go!

2002-06-25 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 05:14:11PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > There appears to be some prelimiary code in mathed/preview.[Ch] that might > interest you. Not yet. As I said, wait a bit. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deser

Re: preview-latex is go!

2002-06-25 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 05:06:39PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > When you do, I wonder if you can think of a way of doing things a little > better ;-) I think parts of the code for the spalsh screen could be factored out into a re-useable class. Constructor would take the file name and a call ba

Re: preview-latex is go!

2002-06-25 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 06:15:57PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > Considering the title of this thread and my complete lack of knowledge > what this might be about, do you consider it likely that the screen > shots for my WYSIWYG talk to be delivered at TUG2002 could need > brushing up for the fina

Re: preview-latex is go!

2002-06-25 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 25 June 2002 5:15 pm, David Kastrup wrote: > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 04:53:30PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > > Ok, André, I've done as you desired and stripped out all the > > > InsetGraphics nonsense from the graphics cache. InsetGraphic

Re: preview-latex is go!

2002-06-25 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 25 June 2002 5:11 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 04:53:30PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > Ok, André, I've done as you desired and stripped out all the > > InsetGraphics nonsense from the graphics cache. InsetGraphics now has > > code to generate the pixmap once the

Re: preview-latex is go!

2002-06-25 Thread David Kastrup
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 04:53:30PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > Ok, André, I've done as you desired and stripped out all the > > InsetGraphics nonsense from the graphics cache. InsetGraphics now > > has code to generate the pixmap once the file is lo

Re: preview-latex is go!

2002-06-25 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 04:53:30PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > Ok, André, I've done as you desired and stripped out all the InsetGraphics > nonsense from the graphics cache. InsetGraphics now has code to generate the > pixmap once the file is loaded. Thank you. I'll have a look. Andre' --

preview-latex is go!

2002-06-25 Thread Angus Leeming
Ok, André, I've done as you desired and stripped out all the InsetGraphics nonsense from the graphics cache. InsetGraphics now has code to generate the pixmap once the file is loaded. LyXScreen (frontends/screen.C) has some equivalent code so that we can show the splash screen once again. So,