Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Samstag, 8. Mai 2004 21:56 schrieb Helge Hafting:
>> I see a problem here. What paragraph types should be selectable
>> in such a document? Letters don't have sectioning, the other
>> classes are almost useless without that.
>
> The allowed types depend on the master, of
Am Samstag, 8. Mai 2004 21:56 schrieb Helge Hafting:
> I see a problem here. What paragraph types should be selectable
> in such a document? Letters don't have sectioning, the other
> classes are almost useless without that.
The allowed types depend on the master, of course.
> Or do you propose
On Sat, May 08, 2004 at 09:56:22PM +0200, Helge Hafting wrote:
> Or do you propose that this subdocument-of-any-class document
> should contain a reference to the master, so the type could
> be looked up that way? That might be troublesome if
> a subdocument is transferred somewhere without the ma
On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 03:07:05PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Helge Hafting wrote:
>
> > Georg Baum wrote:
> >>Only as long as there is no better solution.
> >>
> >>
> > An having unprintable include-book, include-report, include-letter and so
> > on is a better solution?
>
> I never wanted unp
Helge Hafting wrote:
> Georg Baum wrote:
>>Only as long as there is no better solution.
>>
>>
> An having unprintable include-book, include-report, include-letter and so
> on is a better solution?
I never wanted unprintable documents. I only said that subdocuments should
not have the lyx header
Georg Baum wrote:
Helge Hafting wrote:
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 09:46:12AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
5) Fix the real problem behind: double data definition. Define a new
format for included lyx files that is identical to the normal one but
without the header information (similar to latex).
Helge Hafting wrote:
> On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 09:46:12AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
>> 5) Fix the real problem behind: double data definition. Define a new
>> format for included lyx files that is identical to the normal one but
>> without the header information (similar to latex). Currently lyx tr
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 10:03:13AM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> John Levon wrote:
>
> > We already have a "LaTeX errors" dialog box. It could, and should, go
> > there.
> >
> > We need to make the following changes:
> >
> > o) allow our error dialog to have the concept of warnings. Only b
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 09:46:12AM +0200, Georg Baum wrote:
> Cengiz Gunay wrote:
>
> > I believe having a popup which only interrupts an automatic process and
> > waits for mouse click/keyboard is not very useful. I would suggest either:
> >
> > 1) Having a concept of LyX log file/window similar
John Levon wrote:
> We already have a "LaTeX errors" dialog box. It could, and should, go
> there.
>
> We need to make the following changes:
>
> o) allow our error dialog to have the concept of warnings. Only bring
>up the dialog if the compilation failed.
Tottaly agreed here.
> o) allo
Cengiz Gunay wrote:
> I believe having a popup which only interrupts an automatic process and
> waits for mouse click/keyboard is not very useful. I would suggest either:
>
> 1) Having a concept of LyX log file/window similar to the LaTeX log
>concept.
> 2) Having little LyX-Warning boxes emb
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 12:55:30PM -0400, Cengiz Gunay wrote:
> 1) Having a concept of LyX log file/window similar to the LaTeX log
>concept.
We already have a "LaTeX errors" dialog box. It could, and should, go
there.
We need to make the following changes:
o) allow our error dialog to have
Cengiz Gunay wrote:
>
> Dear lyx-devel,
>
> I just tried the 1.4.0cvs version, and as a user of LyX since 6
> years, I want to point out some problems I had with it.
>
> The pop-up warning dialog that comes at time of LaTeX generation is
> really counter-productive. Here is my story: I have a d
Dear lyx-devel,
I just tried the 1.4.0cvs version, and as a user of LyX since 6 years, I
want to point out some problems I had with it.
The pop-up warning dialog that comes at time of LaTeX generation is really
counter-productive. Here is my story: I have a document which is composed
of around
14 matches
Mail list logo
