On 03/31/2016 02:27 PM, Georg Baum wrote:
> Guenter Milde wrote:
>
>> Thinking about it while writing aastex6.layout, there is a major
>> disadvantage of the "old loads new" approach:
>>
>> * aastex6.layout inputs aastex.layout and currently only changes the name
>> and referenced LaTeX class fil
Guenter Milde wrote:
> Thinking about it while writing aastex6.layout, there is a major
> disadvantage of the "old loads new" approach:
>
> * aastex6.layout inputs aastex.layout and currently only changes the name
> and referenced LaTeX class file.
>
> I future, it should also support comm
On 2016-03-30, Guenter Milde wrote:
> On 2016-03-30, Richard Heck wrote:
>> On 03/30/2016 11:26 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
Dear Lyxers,
...
>>> I propose a patch which I ask you to review also under the
>>> perspective that this may become an example for further handling of
>>> such cases (see th
On 2016-03-30, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 03/30/2016 11:26 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
>> Dear Lyxers,
>> the "acmsiggraph" document class has been a source for headaches recently
>> due to an incompatible new version under the old name.
>> I propose a patch which I ask you to review also under the p
On 03/30/2016 11:26 AM, Guenter Milde wrote:
> Dear Lyxers,
>
> the "acmsiggraph" document class has been a source for headaches recently due
> to an incompatible new version under the old name.
>
> I propose a patch which I ask you to review also under the perspective that
> this may become an e
Dear Lyxers,
the "acmsiggraph" document class has been a source for headaches recently
due to an incompatible new version under the old name.
I propose a patch which I ask you to review also under the perspective that
this may become an example for further handling of such cases (see the
"guide
