On 12 Nov 1999 01:28:01 +0100, Lars Gullik Bj°nnes wrote:
>"Arnd Hanses" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>| How can you be sure without '& 0x7f' for all the numerous different
>| Double Byte encodings, commonly used for PC file systems in asian
>| countries? Perhaps some of the asian language porte
"Arnd Hanses" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| How can you be sure without '& 0x7f' for all the numerous different
| Double Byte encodings, commonly used for PC file systems in asian
| countries? Perhaps some of the asian language porters could give a
| helpful summary of the situation?
Does any of
On 10 Nov 1999 04:03:47 +0100, Lars Gullik Bj°nnes wrote:
>One other thing we ofcourse can to is to just use _ for all chars that
>is not in the keep list already, and drop the 0x7f completely. That
>actually has some merits...
>
>| The reason for isalnum() in 1.0.4 and 1.1.1 was precisely to av
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Yes, but it does not really change anything... we are still open
Lars> to errors when two files both have the same name after SpaceLess
Lars> mangling.
Sure, just more pleasant to the eye.
JMarc
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 10-Nov-99 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| >|
| >| I thing we should do exactly that, but not use _, since it is a bit
| >| difficult do count the _ in names like a___b.tex (at least with the
| >| font I use). What about an 'X'?
| >
| > Remember that _
On 10-Nov-99 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>|
>| I thing we should do exactly that, but not use _, since it is a bit
>| difficult do count the _ in names like a___b.tex (at least with the
>| font I use). What about an 'X'?
>
> Remember that _you_ are not supposed to look at that file at all. It
>
>
> _I_ am supposed to look at it when users send bug reports with
> horrible latex logs.
#:O)
Jürgen
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen Vigna E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienstr. 13/N Tel:+39-0471-45
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Do you have a lot of words in french that has three accented
Lars> chars in a row?
Sure: test_accents_éèêàû.tex would cause problems ;)
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars> :-) I don't care as I am not going to look at those filenames.
|
| That's what you think... ``So 1__I_0O___.tex has a dependency on
| 1___I_O__0.bib, but I cannot find it, where the hell is it?''.
If it is a bib file LyX should not mangl
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: |
Lars> > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | |
Lars> Lars> Remember that _you_ are not supposed to look at that file
Lars> at | Lars> all. It should
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> Remember that _you_ are not supposed to look at that file at
| Lars> all. It should be a LyX internal name only.
|
| _I_ am supposed to look at it when users send bug rep
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Remember that _you_ are not supposed to look at that file at
Lars> all. It should be a LyX internal name only.
_I_ am supposed to look at it when users send bug reports with
horrible latex logs.
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> One other thing we ofcourse can to is to just use _ for all
| Lars> chars that is not in the keep list already, and drop the 0x7f
| Lars> completely. That actually has som
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> One other thing we ofcourse can to is to just use _ for all
Lars> chars that is not in the keep list already, and drop the 0x7f
Lars> completely. That actually has some merits...
I thing we should do exactly that, but not use
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjnes) wrote:
|
| > | No!!! Suppose you have a 0x8f in a file name, what do you expect?
| >
| > will latex handle that char? I guess not. AND the spaceless in 1.0.4
| > and 1.1.1 had a & 0x7f
|
| I meant 0xaf which will become 0x2f "/"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjnes) wrote:
> | No!!! Suppose you have a 0x8f in a file name, what do you expect?
>
> will latex handle that char? I guess not. AND the spaceless in 1.0.4
> and 1.1.1 had a & 0x7f
I meant 0xaf which will become 0x2f "/" after applying a & 0x7f
The reason for isa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| I almost forgot what really was the problem.
|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjììnes) wrote:
|
| > Also I think Jean-Marc's proposal should have a "& 0x7f" in it. Too
| > avoid too many X's.
|
| No!!! Suppose you have a 0x8f in a file name, what do you expect?
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | I too think this should
Lars> apply ONLY to tmp_filenames. As I already stated | in an earlier
Lars> email if someone want's to export the latex-file and work | with
Lars> that, he is
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I too think this should apply ONLY to tmp_filenames. As I already stated
| in an earlier email if someone want's to export the latex-file and work
| with that, he is responsible for choosing the right name!
Of course the export stuff in LyX needs a rew
On 03-Nov-99 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>|
>| Lars> I agree that the algorithm Jean-Marc proposes is sufficient. I
>| Lars> think tht the whole SpaceLess function should go. W
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| Lars> I agree that the algorithm Jean-Marc proposes is sufficient. I
| Lars> think tht the whole SpaceLess function should go. We could have
| Lars> a similar function with a di
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> I agree that the algorithm Jean-Marc proposes is sufficient. I
Lars> think tht the whole SpaceLess function should go. We could have
Lars> a similar function with a different name (like
Lars> tex-conforming-name), what I think
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Moreover, using isgraph() does not make sense, since LaTeX could not
| > are less about locales. The list of characters to keep is known, it
| > is in the latex sources.
| >
| [sniped code]
| >
| > And I propose also to rename SpaceLess to something
On 03-Nov-99 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Did you read my message from yesterday? SpaceLess should only be
> needed for latex, and thus only keep characters with catcode 11 or 12.
> We do not care about /, since it is _not_ supposed to be here in a
> valid .lyx file name. If we want to check al
>>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> I have put a new version of SpaceLess in cvs, main trunk. If
Lars> there are other characters than '/' that needs to get
Lars> substituded please add them to the change s
I have put a new version of SpaceLess in cvs, main trunk.
If there are other characters than '/' that needs to get substituded
please add them to the change string.
I would especially like to have this tested on OS/2. Linux/unix should
have no problems with it afaik.
Lgb
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjnes) wrote:
> Does any of these encodings have 'A' in any other position than 64
> (65?)
You are asking a wrong question. 'A' is always 65. The problem
is that 65 can either be 'A' or something completely different.
For example, suppose you get a byte sequence
I almost forgot what really was the problem.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjììnes) wrote:
> Also I think Jean-Marc's proposal should have a "& 0x7f" in it. Too
> avoid too many X's.
No!!! Suppose you have a 0x8f in a file name, what do you expect?
Regards,
SMiyata
28 matches
Mail list logo
