[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjnes) wrote: > | No!!! Suppose you have a 0x8f in a file name, what do you expect? > > will latex handle that char? I guess not. AND the spaceless in 1.0.4 > and 1.1.1 had a & 0x7f I meant 0xaf which will become 0x2f "/" after applying a & 0x7f The reason for isalnum() in 1.0.4 and 1.1.1 was precisely to avoid such situation. BTW LaTeX can handle 0x8f all right if the pool file is created that way. There are quite a few emTeX users who configured TeX compiler for CP437 rather than for ISO8859-X (And they are happily running TeX on file system of CP437 character file names.) Regards, SMiyata
- Re: new version of SpaceLess miyata
- new version of SpaceLess Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: new version of SpaceLess Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: new version of SpaceLess Juergen Vigna
- Re: new version of SpaceLess Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: new version of SpaceLess Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: new version of SpaceLess Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: new version of SpaceLes... Juergen Vigna
- Re: new version of SpaceLes... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: new version of SpaceLes... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: new version of SpaceLess miyata
- Re: new version of SpaceLess Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: new version of SpaceLess Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: new version of SpaceLess Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: new version of SpaceLess Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: new version of SpaceLess Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: new version of SpaceLes... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: new version of SpaceLes... Lars Gullik Bjønnes
- Re: new version of SpaceLes... Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
- Re: new version of SpaceLess Juergen Vigna
- Re: new version of SpaceLess Juergen Vigna