Re: new mathed bug

2001-08-20 Thread Angus Leeming
On Monday 20 August 2001 10:30, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 10:32:11AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > Can't exit from the right hand side of the inset using either the arrow or > > space buttons. The cursor just loops back to the front. If the inset is in a > > note inset,

Re: new mathed bug

2001-08-20 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Mon, Aug 20, 2001 at 10:32:11AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > Can't exit from the right hand side of the inset using either the arrow or > space buttons. The cursor just loops back to the front. If the inset is in a > note inset, then pressing Esc has "intersting" positional effects. Hm.. sp

new mathed bug

2001-08-20 Thread Angus Leeming
Can't exit from the right hand side of the inset using either the arrow or space buttons. The cursor just loops back to the front. If the inset is in a note inset, then pressing Esc has "intersting" positional effects. Angus

Re: one more (new) mathed bug

2001-08-17 Thread Andre Poenitz
> So it appears that the problem really lies in what you do after the > \end_inset command. Pretty easy: _I_ do nothing there. I do not even write the \end_inset Andre' -- André Pönitz . [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: one more (new) mathed bug

2001-08-17 Thread Angus Leeming
Ok, here's the clean snippet. The dispersion studies above have all used \begin_inset Formula $D=D_{\textrm{mol}}$ \end_inset , the species' coefficient of molecular diffusion. Note no space before final $ and no space on next line before the comma. Read it in, write it out: The dispersio

Re: new mathed bug

2001-08-17 Thread Andre Poenitz
> create an equation with a label. Save and close the document. Open it again: > the label has gone. Fixed. I got it mixed up in the new parser Andre' -- André Pönitz . [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: one more (new) mathed bug

2001-08-17 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 04:28:42PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > It appears that when reading an existing document with some inline math in a > paragraph, mathed inserts extra spaces immediately after the math inset in > the lyx text. Move the cursor through these spaces and they're gobbled up,

Re: one more (new) mathed bug

2001-08-17 Thread Angus Leeming
On Friday 17 August 2001 16:28, Angus Leeming wrote: > It appears that when reading an existing document with some inline math in a > paragraph, mathed inserts extra spaces immediately after the math inset in > the lyx text. Move the cursor through these spaces and they're gobbled up, > one by

one more (new) mathed bug

2001-08-17 Thread Angus Leeming
It appears that when reading an existing document with some inline math in a paragraph, mathed inserts extra spaces immediately after the math inset in the lyx text. Move the cursor through these spaces and they're gobbled up, one by one. Angus

new mathed bug

2001-08-17 Thread Angus Leeming
André, create an equation with a label. Save and close the document. Open it again: the label has gone. Angus

Re: New Mathed bug

2001-08-07 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 02:36:57PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote: > > On 07-Aug-2001 Angus Leeming wrote: > > > More seriously, if the bug report is recieved by a wide audience, then it may > > be recieved by someone who can pinpoint the problem quickly. Jürgen knows the > > InsetText stuff well

Re: New Mathed bug

2001-08-07 Thread Andre Poenitz
> be recieved by someone who can pinpoint the problem quickly. Jürgen knows the > InsetText stuff well. Ditto André with Mathed. Mathed is dead easy nowadays. A few dusty corners maybe, but nothing to be scared of. So most of the "in the menu xxx should be greyed out" kind of things could be fix

Re: New Mathed bug

2001-08-07 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 07-Aug-2001 Angus Leeming wrote: > More seriously, if the bug report is recieved by a wide audience, then it may > be recieved by someone who can pinpoint the problem quickly. Jürgen knows the > InsetText stuff well. Ditto André with Mathed. You? Well you know a little I > guess ;-) Me? I

Re: New Mathed bug

2001-08-07 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tuesday 07 August 2001 13:14, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | Sorry, forgot the important bandwidth stuff... > | > | Mathed is now sufficiently good that I'm using the cvs version to work with > | in preference to 1.1.6. This statement can, in fa

Re: New Mathed bug

2001-08-07 Thread Andre Poenitz
> | Mathed is now sufficiently good that I'm using the cvs version to work with > | in preference to 1.1.6. This statement can, in fact, be generalised. The cvs I would not recommend using it for serious short term work, though. The overall structure is ok now, but you have noticed that some th

Re: New Mathed bug

2001-08-07 Thread Angus Leeming
Sorry, forgot the important bandwidth stuff... Mathed is now sufficiently good that I'm using the cvs version to work with in preference to 1.1.6. This statement can, in fact, be generalised. The cvs version is pretty good, period. Well done all! A On Tuesday 07 August 2001 12:30, Andre Poen

Re: New Mathed bug

2001-08-07 Thread Andre Poenitz
> 1. The contents of the copy buffer are pasted in. Not good. Wasn't the > consensus that this should be reverted? I think it was. > 2. More seriously, try to edit the superscripted 1/2. I can't get the cursor > to the right of it to delete it. At the moment I'm having to create the > desired

New Mathed bug

2001-08-07 Thread Angus Leeming
Create a new math inset. Create a fraction: \frac{1}{2} Highlight it and cut it Create a superscript: V^... 1. The contents of the copy buffer are pasted in. Not good. Wasn't the consensus that this should be reverted? 2. More seriously, try to edit the superscripted 1/2. I can't get the cursor