On Sunday 04 February 2007 9:26:31 am Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Samstag, 3. Februar 2007 18:29 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> > I think that 2.3 already is a requirement, as stated in the README file.
We have decided for 2.3 due to its support of unicode, what you have done
just reinforces that argu
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 10:26:31AM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Samstag, 3. Februar 2007 18:29 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
>
> > I think that 2.3 already is a requirement, as stated in the README file.
>
> Oops, you are right. I remembered that we decided 2.2, but was wrong
> obviously.
That w
Am Samstag, 3. Februar 2007 18:29 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> I think that 2.3 already is a requirement, as stated in the README file.
Oops, you are right. I remembered that we decided 2.2, but was wrong
obviously.
Georg
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 03:06:14PM +, John Levon wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 12:15:43PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
>
> > I just noticed that I unintentionally raised the minimum required python
> > version by using unicodedata.normalize() for the InsetLatexAccent
> > conversions in lyx2l
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 12:15:43PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> I just noticed that I unintentionally raised the minimum required python
> version by using unicodedata.normalize() for the InsetLatexAccent
> conversions in lyx2lyx.
>
> What are we going to do here? The problem is that normalizatio
I just noticed that I unintentionally raised the minimum required python
version by using unicodedata.normalize() for the InsetLatexAccent
conversions in lyx2lyx.
What are we going to do here? The problem is that normalization is
essential in the accent conversion, so the only possibilities I s
