On Sunday 04 February 2007 9:26:31 am Georg Baum wrote: > Am Samstag, 3. Februar 2007 18:29 schrieb Enrico Forestieri: > > I think that 2.3 already is a requirement, as stated in the README file.
We have decided for 2.3 due to its support of unicode, what you have done just reinforces that argument. OTHO there is no urgent need to jump to 2.4 in the next version. :-) > Oops, you are right. I remembered that we decided 2.2, but was wrong > obviously. As Enrico stated this was done for 1.4.x > Georg -- José Abílio
