Re: [Cvslog] r26482 - in /lyx-devel/trunk/lib: bind/de/menus.bind bind...

2008-09-22 Thread Uwe Stöhr
> Umlaut mutilation frenzy? No, the files are now in UTF-8. regards Uwe

Re: [Cvslog] r26482 - in /lyx-devel/trunk/lib: bind/de/menus.bind bind...

2008-09-22 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 09:09:40PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/lib/bind/de/menus.bind > URL: > http://www.lyx.org/trac/file/lyx-devel/trunk/lib/bind/de/menus.bind?rev=26482 >

Re: menus.bind

2000-12-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>>>>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> Lars, I notice that running 1.1.6 for the first time still Angus> results in "menus.bind" being the bind file. Whilst it would be Angus> good to find the real cause of this

Re: menus.bind

2000-12-11 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> This will probably mean that only bind_file will be supported by Lars> lyxrc and that all binds will have to be in a bind_file. That makes more sense anyway, since lyxrc should contain variable assignments, not commands. JMar

Re: menus.bind

2000-12-09 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | >>>>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Angus> Lars, I notice that running 1.1.6 for the first time still | Angus> results in "menus.bind" being the bind file. Whils

Re: menus.bind

2000-12-09 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars, I notice that running 1.1.6 for the first time still results in | "menus.bind" being the bind file. Whilst it would be good to find the real | cause of this problem, I think that a one line fix to lib/configure | is needed for t

Re: menus.bind

2000-12-08 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>>>>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> Lars, I notice that running 1.1.6 for the first time still Angus> results in "menus.bind" being the bind file. Whilst it would be Angus> good to find the real cause of this

menus.bind

2000-12-08 Thread Angus Leeming
Lars, I notice that running 1.1.6 for the first time still results in "menus.bind" being the bind file. Whilst it would be good to find the real cause of this problem, I think that a one line fix to lib/configure is needed for the 1.1.6 release. Angus Index:

Re: menus.bind ditch it!

2000-09-05 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars> > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Lars> Lars> None that we still want to gelive I think... | | You mean Lars> we should not have keyboar

Re: menus.bind ditch it!

2000-09-04 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Lars> None that we still want to gelive I think... | | You mean we should not have keyboard shortcuts for underline or | sans-serif? Did you edit a lot of LyX documentation wit

Re: menus.bind ditch it!

2000-09-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> None that we still want to gelive I think... You mean we should not have keyboard shortcuts for underline or sans-serif? Did you edit a lot of LyX documentation with menu names in them? I think such things should be available

Re: menus.bind ditch it!

2000-09-04 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | >>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Lars> I strongly belive that we should get rid of menus.bind, they | Lars> contain duplicate "shortcuts" for the menubar th

Re: menus.bind ditch it!

2000-09-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>>>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> I strongly belive that we should get rid of menus.bind, they Lars> contain duplicate "shortcuts" for the menubar that does not work Lars> anyway. There is one section from m

menus.bind ditch it!

2000-08-04 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
I strongly belive that we should get rid of menus.bind, they contain duplicate "shortcuts" for the menubar that does not work anyway. There is one section from menus.bind that we want: the bindings for the layout dropdown, this should be moved to a layout.bind. Opinions? Lgb

Re: Patched menus.bind

1998-12-22 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>>>>> "Etienne" == Etienne Grossmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Etienne>Hello, Etienne> here is a little patch for menus.bind. It only touches the Etienne> File and Insert menus. The changes were made to try to ensure Etienne> that M-e XYZ

Patched menus.bind

1998-12-21 Thread Etienne Grossmann
Hello, here is a little patch for menus.bind. It only touches the File and Insert menus. The changes were made to try to ensure that M-e XYZ does the same thing as M-e space XYZ . Some functions have changed, like "M-f i" doesn't do "buffer-export ascii" anymo

Re: Suggestions for menus.bind

1998-12-21 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
tter or not. Etienne> This could make it easier for new users to learn the Etienne> shortcuts. And confuse experienced users who already use Etienne> them. Hello, Yes, ensuring that the menus.bind bindings are correct would definitely be a good thing. I think that all errors are due to a bad maintenance. JMarc

Suggestions for menus.bind

1998-12-18 Thread Etienne Grossmann
Hello, this is just to suggest adding these lines to menus.bind. \bind "M-i o f" "buffer-float-insert figure" \bind "M-i o t" "buffer-float-insert table" \bind "M-i o w" "buffer-float-insert wide-fig" \bi