On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 05:43:33PM +0200, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Am Montag, dem 14.04.2025 um 17:04 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> > > Not for very much longer, hopefully.
> >
> > If I were you, I would not hold my breath.
>
> But I hold my breath for breakable insets!
Well played! A
Le 14 avril 2025 20:08:11 GMT+02:00, Richard Kimberly Heck
a écrit :
>Agreed, as well, though I'm curious why this machinery wouldn't be in
>InsetCollapsible and so 'just work' for footnotes and branches and so forth.
First, I suspect that multipar insets will be more difficult and will not mak
On 4/14/25 12:39 PM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Am Montag, dem 14.04.2025 um 18:28 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
We'll see whether this works out. What is you shopping list on this
BTW? For now I am eyeing single-paragraph text insets with décoration
below. Does it make sense?
Yes. Most im
Le 14/04/2025 à 16:23, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Any idea why you were doing at that time ? I'll take a look this evening.
I see that it is not difficult to trigger, but I am surprised by the
location.
This was mainly tested with the "it still compiles" strategy.
JMarc
--
lyx-devel mai
Am Montag, dem 14.04.2025 um 18:28 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> We'll see whether this works out. What is you shopping list on this
> BTW? For now I am eyeing single-paragraph text insets with décoration
> below. Does it make sense?
Yes. Most importantly I'd like to have it for all sorts
Le 14 avril 2025 18:15:18 GMT+02:00, Scott Kostyshak a écrit
:
>Well played! At first, JMarc makes us think that breakable insets are a reach
>and uncertain.
I will implement them. But it may be such a mess that you will beg me to revert
:)
>Now we make him think that "OK well if you aren't
Le 14 avril 2025 17:43:33 GMT+02:00, "Jürgen Spitzmüller" a
écrit :
>Am Montag, dem 14.04.2025 um 17:04 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
>> > Not for very much longer, hopefully.
>>
>> If I were you, I would not hold my breath.
>
>But I hold my breath for breakable insets!
>
>--
>Jürgen
>--
Am Montag, dem 14.04.2025 um 17:04 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> > Not for very much longer, hopefully.
>
> If I were you, I would not hold my breath.
But I hold my breath for breakable insets!
--
Jürgen
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
https://lists.lyx.org/mailman/li
Le 14/04/2025 à 16:52, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
You see how I am rewarded ;) There is a 1V electric fence around
this thing.
Not for very much longer, hopefully.
If I were you, I would not hold my breath.
JMarc
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
https://lists.lyx.org/m
Am Montag, dem 14.04.2025 um 16:23 +0200 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes:
> Sigh. I really thought these did not change anything.
>
> Any idea why you were doing at that time ? I'll take a look this
> evening.
I believe it was due to a document with external references that
attempted to open the re
Le 14/04/2025 à 15:14, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
Other than that, great to see you are brave enough to touch this,
JMarc.
Stupid error fixed now. For the record, it was in a super-safe renaming
patch :-/
I am not really daring to change the macro thing. I am currently just
trying to simp
Le 14/04/2025 à 15:14, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit :
after the recent macro-related commits.
Sigh. I really thought these did not change anything.
Any idea why you were doing at that time ? I'll take a look this evening.
Other than that, great to see you are brave enough to touch this,
JMarc
after the recent macro-related commits.
(gdb) bt
#0 lyx::Buffer::Impl::updateMacros (this=, it=...,
scope=...) at Buffer.cpp:3939
#1 0x00760f9a in lyx::Buffer::updateMacros
(this=this@entry=0x25d2380) at Buffer.cpp:3994
#2 0x0076cc2a in lyx::Buffer::readDocument
(this=this@entry
13 matches
Mail list logo
