Re: [LyX/master] make distcheck broken after old installer purge.

On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 04:31:31PM +0100, Pavel Sanda wrote: > commit dded4c8ab548892d86480d11541ad9a350e4c450 > Author: Pavel Sanda > Date: Sun Jan 31 16:32:51 2021 +0100 > > make distcheck broken after old installer purge. JMarc, are you able to somehow check whether jenk

Re: [LyX/master] Toward again working make distcheck.

Am Di., 26. März 2019 um 15:33 Uhr schrieb Pavel Sanda : > the current attic in lib look somewhat unsystematic now though: > ./bind/attic > ./images/attic > ./doc/attic > I've moved all these to ./attic now. Jürgen > ./attic > > > Pavel >

Re: [LyX/master] Toward again working make distcheck.

f into lib/doc/attic/templates >> and be done with it. >> Or rather  lib/attic/templates. >> This is indeed the best solution. >> Done. Good, make distcheck work here now. Let's see what jenkins has to say about the current situation. >> Should we mo

Re: [LyX/master] Toward again working make distcheck.

Le 26/03/2019 à 15:24, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : Am Di., 26. März 2019 um 15:07 Uhr schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes mailto:lasgout...@lyx.org>>: > I propose to move the attic stuff into lib/doc/attic/templates and be done with it. Or rather  lib/attic/templates. This is indee

Re: [LyX/master] Toward again working make distcheck.

Am Di., 26. März 2019 um 15:07 Uhr schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes < lasgout...@lyx.org>: > > I propose to move the attic stuff into lib/doc/attic/templates and be > done with it. > > Or rather lib/attic/templates. > > This is indeed the best solution. > Done. Should we move lib/doc/attic also to l

Re: [LyX/master] Toward again working make distcheck.

Le 26/03/2019 à 14:50, Pavel Sanda a écrit : On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 10:00:04AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: If I correctly understand Pavel's eloborations, because I have added the files to Rules-Lyx (in order to get the names into the po files). That's indeed my finding. I propose to mov

Re: [LyX/master] Toward again working make distcheck.

On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 10:00:04AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > If I correctly understand Pavel's eloborations, because I have added the > files to Rules-Lyx (in order to get the names into the po files). That's indeed my finding. I propose to move the attic stuff into lib/doc/attic/template

Re: [LyX/master] Toward again working make distcheck.

Am Di., 26. März 2019 um 09:54 Uhr schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes < lasgout...@lyx.org>: > So why does it break here but not in development/? > If I correctly understand Pavel's eloborations, because I have added the files to Rules-Lyx (in order to get the names into the po files). Jürgen > > JM

Re: [LyX/master] Toward again working make distcheck.

ile is one step further. I see. But not mentioning is the problem here. It breaks with make distcheck. See Pavel's OP. So why does it break here but not in development/? JMarc

Re: [LyX/master] Toward again working make distcheck.

ing is the problem here. It breaks with make distcheck. See Pavel's OP. Jürgen > > JMarc >

Re: [LyX/master] Toward again working make distcheck.

Le 26/03/2019 à 09:31, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : Am Di., 26. März 2019 um 09:30 Uhr schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes mailto:lasgout...@lyx.org>>: Le 26/03/2019 à 09:03, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : > Am Di., 26. März 2019 um 01:39 Uhr schrieb Pavel Sanda mailto:sa...@lyx.org> >

Re: [LyX/master] Toward again working make distcheck.

Am Di., 26. März 2019 um 09:30 Uhr schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes < lasgout...@lyx.org>: > Le 26/03/2019 à 09:03, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : > > Am Di., 26. März 2019 um 01:39 Uhr schrieb Pavel Sanda > >: > > > > The only touch which seems to be missing for distcheck to

Re: [LyX/master] Toward again working make distcheck.

Le 26/03/2019 à 09:03, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : Am Di., 26. März 2019 um 01:39 Uhr schrieb Pavel Sanda >: The only touch which seems to be missing for distcheck to work is templates/Attic. Either move it elsewhere or remove it or put the files to Makefile.am

Re: [LyX/master] Toward again working make distcheck.

Am Di., 26. März 2019 um 01:39 Uhr schrieb Pavel Sanda : > The only touch which seems to be missing for distcheck to work > is templates/Attic. Either move it elsewhere or remove it or > put the files to Makefile.am. Was not sure which is your preference. > Would it be enough to put them to dist_

Re: [LyX/master] Toward again working make distcheck.

On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 11:03:46AM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Mo., 25. März 2019 um 10:48 Uhr schrieb Pavel Sanda : > > > dist_pkgdata_DATA = CREDITS autocorrect chkconfig.ltx \ > > encodings layouttranslations languages latexfonts RELEASE-NOTES \ > > @@ -200,7 +200,8 @@ dist_f

Re: [LyX/master] Toward again working make distcheck.

Am Mo., 25. März 2019 um 10:48 Uhr schrieb Pavel Sanda : > dist_pkgdata_DATA = CREDITS autocorrect chkconfig.ltx \ > encodings layouttranslations languages latexfonts RELEASE-NOTES \ > @@ -200,7 +200,8 @@ dist_frpresentationexamples_DATA = \ > examples/fr/Presentations/Beamer_Arti

Re: make distcheck: cannot remove '../../po/lyx.pot'

r and Ubuntu 16.04. > > > > Does the following work for anyone on current master? > > > > git reset --hard && git clean -xdf && ./autogen.sh && > > ./configure --enable-build-type=pre && > > make && > > make check &am

Re: make distcheck: cannot remove '../../po/lyx.pot'

ean -xdf && ./autogen.sh && ./configure --enable-build-type=pre && make && make check && make distcheck && echo "GOOD" For what is worth, it works for me on ubuntu 17.10. JMarc

Re: Current CI jobs (Added CI job for : Ubuntu 16.04 + Qt4 + autotols runing up to 'make distcheck')

On 13 February 2017 at 22:06, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > If someone has instructions on how to build on some other platform, i.e. > > not Ubuntu..., let me know and I can set up such a job. > > You have list of available distros or you need to build your own image? I think pretty much all distros a

Re: Current CI jobs (Added CI job for : Ubuntu 16.04 + Qt4 + autotols runing up to 'make distcheck')

Christian Ridderström wrote: > If someone has instructions on how to build on some other platform, i.e. > not Ubuntu..., let me know and I can set up such a job. You have list of available distros or you need to build your own image? Pavel

Current CI jobs (Added CI job for : Ubuntu 16.04 + Qt4 + autotols runing up to 'make distcheck')

Hi, Using Jean-Marc's patch to get 'make distcheck' to work with a later version of autoconf, I've now gotten this CI job to pass: https://ci.inria.fr/lyx/job/build-master-head/job/ubuntu-xenial-qt4-autotools-extended/ The job applies Jean-Marc's patch at the beginni

Re: [LyX/master] Ressurect make distcheck.

Richard Heck wrote: > On 07/15/2016 02:47 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >> that? From what I understand, 'make distcheck' fails with the > >> ambiguous "lyx.pot" error, which is not informative, leaving a git > >>

Re: [LyX/master] Ressurect make distcheck.

On 07/15/2016 02:47 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> that? From what I understand, 'make distcheck' fails with the >> ambiguous "lyx.pot" error, which is not informative, leaving a git >> bisect the only way to fix issues like this. >

Re: [LyX/master] Ressurect make distcheck.

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > that? From what I understand, 'make distcheck' fails with the > ambiguous "lyx.pot" error, which is not informative, leaving a git > bisect the only way to fix issues like this. We know symptoms, not the cause. Until that changes 'fix' is improbable. Pavel

Re: [LyX/master] Ressurect make distcheck.

On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 10:17:22PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > commit 8085899fb6dbea6ab842cba5dd40b079863a7e24 > Author: Pavel Sanda > Date: Mon Jul 4 13:17:07 2016 -0700 > > Ressurect make distcheck. > --- > lib/Makefile.am |1 + > 1 files changed, 1 in

Re: make distcheck: cannot remove '../../po/lyx.pot'

Pavel Sanda wrote: > This was a tough one. distcheck was broken for a while (while showing it's > famous lyx.pot message) and bisecting nowadays master is like walking > through the minefield where bunch of commits do not compile at all or git > gets crazy due to cr-lf mismanagement. I still do n

Re: make distcheck: cannot remove '../../po/lyx.pot'

On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 02:42:47PM -0700, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > Does the following work for anyone on current master? > > > > git reset --hard && git clean -xdf && ./autogen.sh && > > ./configure --enable-build-type=pre

Re: make distcheck: cannot remove '../../po/lyx.pot'

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Does the following work for anyone on current master? > > git reset --hard && git clean -xdf && ./autogen.sh && > ./configure --enable-build-type=pre && > make && > make check && > make distcheck &&am

Re: make distcheck: cannot remove '../../po/lyx.pot'

15 with Ubuntu 15.10 and I do get the same error. The > mystery remains. I still see this with current master and Ubuntu 16.04. Does the following work for anyone on current master? git reset --hard && git clean -xdf && ./autogen.sh && ./configure --enable-build-type=pre

Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

Le 18/04/2016 18:09, Richard Heck a écrit : On 04/18/2016 08:12 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 16/04/2016 06:19, Stephan Witt a écrit : <0001-Make-monolithic-build-code-portable-to-Mac-OS.patch> Sorry for the late response: yes, it works here on my Mac. I put it in 2.3-staging. Richard

Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

On 04/18/2016 08:12 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 16/04/2016 06:19, Stephan Witt a écrit : >>> <0001-Make-monolithic-build-code-portable-to-Mac-OS.patch> >> >> Sorry for the late response: yes, it works here on my Mac. > > I put it in 2.3-staging. > > Richard, is it OK for 2.2.2? Yes. rh

Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

Le 16/04/2016 06:19, Stephan Witt a écrit : <0001-Make-monolithic-build-code-portable-to-Mac-OS.patch> Sorry for the late response: yes, it works here on my Mac. I put it in 2.3-staging. Richard, is it OK for 2.2.2? JMarc

Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

Am 13.04.2016 um 18:30 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : > > Le 09/03/2016 13:04, Stephan Witt a écrit : >> Sorry - it should be: >> >> @for file in $(SOURCEFILES) ; do echo '#include "'$file'"' ; done > $@ >> >> With the hash sign included. > > I return to these monolithic builds. Does this work

Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

Le 09/03/2016 13:04, Stephan Witt a écrit : Sorry - it should be: @for file in $(SOURCEFILES) ; do echo '#include "'$file'"' ; done > $@ With the hash sign included. I return to these monolithic builds. Does this work on your mac? JMarc >From 56a5c7d652df9e337a91273854b700ab68ca796e Mon S

Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 09:07:14PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Actually the concept was : > 1. Take a quick look at the relevant makefile > 2. If it looks difficult to fix then >2.1 pretend you don't have time for pointless stuff > Else >2.2 fix the bug and brag about it. Nice ap

Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

Le 09/03/2016 20:06, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : It works now. Thank you. It is in. JMarc

Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

Actually the concept was : 1. Take a quick look at the relevant makefile 2. If it looks difficult to fix then 2.1 pretend you don't have time for pointless stuff Else 2.2 fix the bug and brag about it. I will apply ASAP. Jmarc Le 9 mars 2016 20:06:30 GMT+01:00, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :

Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 10:55:33AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 09/03/2016 09:56, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : > >AFAICS what you do does not test that the distributed LyX works with > >monolithic builds, but that the "make dist" machinery still works when > >configuring with monolithi

Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

> Am 09.03.2016 um 13:00 schrieb Stephan Witt : > > Am 09.03.2016 um 11:37 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : >> >> Le 09/03/2016 11:30, Stephan Witt a écrit : > Personally, I did not know this -e option, and it is not very standard IMO. I do not know what is a standard way to add a line

Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

Am 09.03.2016 um 11:37 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : > > Le 09/03/2016 11:30, Stephan Witt a écrit : >> If this is a bug I cannot decide - indeed this is a little bit weird: >> >> $ echo -e x >> x >> $ which echo >> /bin/echo >> $ type echo >> echo is a shell builtin >> $ sh >> sh-3.2$ type echo

Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

Le 09/03/2016 11:30, Stephan Witt a écrit : If this is a bug I cannot decide - indeed this is a little bit weird: $ echo -e x x $ which echo /bin/echo $ type echo echo is a shell builtin $ sh sh-3.2$ type echo echo is a shell builtin sh-3.2$ echo -e x -e x sh-3.2$ And "help echo"? Personally

Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

Am 09.03.2016 um 11:03 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : > > Le 08/03/2016 22:49, Stephan Witt a écrit : >> 1. What’s the point of using --enable-monolithic-build=yes ? >> >> I cannot compile LyX with it on Mac. >> >> >> CXX liblyxqt4.o >> liblyxqt4.cpp:1:1: erro

Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

Le 08/03/2016 22:49, Stephan Witt a écrit : 1. What’s the point of using --enable-monolithic-build=yes ? I cannot compile LyX with it on Mac. CXX liblyxqt4.o liblyxqt4.cpp:1:1: error: expected external declaration -e ^ liblyxqt4.cpp:1:2: error: unknown type

Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

Le 09/03/2016 09:56, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit : AFAICS what you do does not test that the distributed LyX works with monolithic builds, but that the "make dist" machinery still works when configuring with monolithic builds. I tend to think that it is pointless. But since I am fundamentally

Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

Le 08/03/2016 23:47, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : 1. What’s the point of using --enable-monolithic-build=yes ? See Pavel's response for what you were probably most interested in. My response is simply that as the release manager I want to test as many options as possible. AFAICS what you do does

Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

ersion (i.e. system specific) or whether we just haven't run the exact >>> same commands when comparing results (for example, I had been using >>> out-of-source builds). I'll paste the commands again below that result >>> in an error for me: >>> >>> ./au

Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > I'm not sure if we should be concerned that you can't build a monolithic > build or not on Mac. Does anyone think this is a problem we should be > concerned with? Monolithic option is interesting for folks who compile lyx from tarball on their own - like in linux distros b

Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

r example, I had been using > > out-of-source builds). I'll paste the commands again below that result > > in an error for me: > > > > ./autogen.sh && > > ./configure --enable-build-type=pre --enable-monolithic-build=yes && > > make &&am

Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

Stephan Witt wrote: > 1. What???s the point of using --enable-monolithic-build=yes ? Should be considerably faster to compile than separate units (unless you have dozen of cores allowing -j parallelism). Pavel

Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

issue or autotools > version (i.e. system specific) or whether we just haven't run the exact > same commands when comparing results (for example, I had been using > out-of-source builds). I'll paste the commands again below that result > in an error for me: > > ./autogen.sh

Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

hen comparing results (for example, I had been using out-of-source builds). I'll paste the commands again below that result in an error for me: ./autogen.sh && ./configure --enable-build-type=pre --enable-monolithic-build=yes && make && make check && make distcheck && echo "all passed" Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 11:36:08AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 07/03/2016 06:14, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > >But setting --enable-monolithic-build to "no" leads to all of the > >commands passing. > > I would just advise to avoid this option for distcheck, then :) We do not > have to t

Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

Le 07/03/2016 06:14, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : But setting --enable-monolithic-build to "no" leads to all of the commands passing. I would just advise to avoid this option for distcheck, then :) We do not have to test all possibilities here (the monolithic option is used for preparing the dis

Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 11:03:59PM -0500, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 12:26:32PM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > Am I not supposed to run make distcheck out of source? > > > > I don't have answer for the que

Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

Le 27/02/2016 21:41, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : Am I not supposed to run make distcheck out of source? To be frank, I don't know. JMarc

Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 12:26:32PM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > Am I not supposed to run make distcheck out of source? > > I don't have answer for the question above but in case you > are capable to run make distcheck inside the tree then > I

Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > Am I not supposed to run make distcheck out of source? I don't have answer for the question above but in case you are capable to run make distcheck inside the tree then I would say there is no big pressure to fix your particular config & /tmp scenario for 2.2

Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

d > >>>Actually I think it was AC 2.69 and am 1.14.1. > >> > >>Oh I see, Scott, the following tarball is made with the autotools > >>which I reported to work on my machine. > >>Can you check, whether just configure and make distcheck without >

Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

autotools which I reported to work on my machine. Can you check, whether just configure and make distcheck without invoking autogen works for you? 195.113.26.193/~sanda/lyx-2.2.0dev.tar.bz2 It works perfectly here. Even with -j5 JMarc

Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

. Can you check, whether just configure and make distcheck without invoking autogen works for you? 195.113.26.193/~sanda/lyx-2.2.0dev.tar.bz2 It works perfectly here. JMarc

Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

the autotools which I > reported to work on my machine. > Can you check, whether just configure and make distcheck without invoking > autogen works for you? > 195.113.26.193/~sanda/lyx-2.2.0dev.tar.bz2 Thanks for the tar. I didn't have a chance to look at this tonight. I'll do

Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

re and make distcheck without invoking autogen works for you? 195.113.26.193/~sanda/lyx-2.2.0dev.tar.bz2 Pavel

Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

This is the beta2 tar.gz. The versions are whatever Scott used Actually I think it was AC 2.69 and am 1.14.1. JMarc Le 23 février 2016 02:23:09 GMT+01:00, Pavel Sanda a écrit : >Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Le 18/02/2016 04:45, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >>> make distch

Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 18/02/2016 04:45, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : >> make distcheck fails for some people and passes for others. It fails for >> me. I think it passes for Pavel now that Georg's fix was committed. >> >> We have not gotten to the root of w

Re: Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

Le 18/02/2016 04:45, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : make distcheck fails for some people and passes for others. It fails for me. I think it passes for Pavel now that Georg's fix was committed. We have not gotten to the root of why make distcheck fails for some. See this thread for previous ef

Is "make distcheck" failure a blocker?

make distcheck fails for some people and passes for others. It fails for me. I think it passes for Pavel now that Georg's fix was committed. We have not gotten to the root of why make distcheck fails for some. See this thread for previous efforts: https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=

Re: make distcheck: cannot remove '../../po/lyx.pot'

it out. Not sure when > > >though. > > > > I just tried it and it worked without problem. Actually, I suspect that > > there is some timing problem that creates wrong dependencies between files. > > If I do > > make -j4 > make check > make distcheck >

Re: make distcheck: cannot remove '../../po/lyx.pot'

r >counts. >> >> >It would be nice to know what happens with 1.15. Ubuntu 15.10 has >1.15 >> >so I will try to do a fresh install and check it out. Not sure when >> >though. >> >> I just tried it and it worked without problem. Actually, I suspect &

Re: make distcheck: cannot remove '../../po/lyx.pot'

g problem that creates wrong dependencies between files. If I do make -j4 make check make distcheck Does the 'make distcheck' know that I asked for 4 jobs in the make call? If so, could parallel building be a cause of the timing differences? Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: make distcheck: cannot remove '../../po/lyx.pot'

On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 02:47:35PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 12/01/2016 03:51, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : > >It would be nice to know what happens with 1.15. Ubuntu 15.10 has 1.15 > >so I will try to do a fresh install and check it out. Not sure when > >though. > > I just tried it an

Re: make distcheck: cannot remove '../../po/lyx.pot'

itable so we ## can make our new subdirs. chmod -R a-w $(distdir) chmod u+w $(distdir) mkdir $(distdir)/_build $(distdir)/_inst ## Undo the write access. chmod a-w $(distdir) Still, 'make distcheck' fails. Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: make distcheck: cannot remove '../../po/lyx.pot'

Le 12/01/2016 03:51, Scott Kostyshak a écrit : I wonder if the difference in behavior is due to: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake/2012-07/msg00023.html That thread is linked to on the main page: https://www.gnu.org/software/automake/ It is interesting but I fail to see how this could

Re: make distcheck: cannot remove '../../po/lyx.pot'

On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 01:48:59PM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Georg Baum wrote: > > Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > > > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > >> > > >> Can you reproduce now? > > > > > > Nope. Smells like automake/autoconf versions. What is your config? > > > > These versions produce the error f

Re: make distcheck: cannot remove '../../po/lyx.pot'

Am Freitag, 8. Januar 2016 um 21:43:17, schrieb Georg Baum > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 02:30:58PM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote: > >> Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >> > > > These versions produce the error for me: > >> > > > > >> > > > $ ./autogen.sh > >> > > > Using automake (

Re: make distcheck: cannot remove '../../po/lyx.pot'

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 02:30:58PM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote: >> Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> > > > These versions produce the error for me: >> > > > >> > > > $ ./autogen.sh >> > > > Using automake (GNU automake) 1.14.1 >> > > > Using autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.69 >> > > > >>

Re: make distcheck: cannot remove '../../po/lyx.pot'

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > I do observe this problem on 2.1.x. Cool, so we don't see regression in terms of lyx codebase :) P

Re: make distcheck: cannot remove '../../po/lyx.pot'

On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 02:30:58PM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > These versions produce the error for me: > > > > > > > > $ ./autogen.sh > > > > Using automake (GNU automake) 1.14.1 > > > > Using autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.69 > > > > > > > > > > > > Georg > > > > >

Re: make distcheck: cannot remove '../../po/lyx.pot'

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > These versions produce the error for me: > > > > > > $ ./autogen.sh > > > Using automake (GNU automake) 1.14.1 > > > Using autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.69 > > > > > > > > > Georg > > > > I have the same, with the error too. > > I have the same as Kornel and Georg. A

Re: make distcheck: cannot remove '../../po/lyx.pot'

On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 10:59:26PM +0100, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 7. Januar 2016 um 22:42:03, schrieb Georg Baum > > > Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > > > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > >> > > >> Can you reproduce now? > > > > > > Nope. Smells like automake/autoconf versions. What is your co

Re: make distcheck: cannot remove '../../po/lyx.pot'

Am Donnerstag, 7. Januar 2016 um 22:42:03, schrieb Georg Baum > Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >> > >> Can you reproduce now? > > > > Nope. Smells like automake/autoconf versions. What is your config? > > These versions produce the error for me: > > $ ./autogen.sh > Using

Re: make distcheck: cannot remove '../../po/lyx.pot'

Georg Baum wrote: > Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >> > >> Can you reproduce now? > > > > Nope. Smells like automake/autoconf versions. What is your config? > > These versions produce the error for me: > > $ ./autogen.sh > Using automake (GNU automake) 1.14.1 > Using autoco

Re: make distcheck: cannot remove '../../po/lyx.pot'

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > Nope. Smells like automake/autoconf versions. What is your config? > > First part is below. Do you want the whole (long) config.log file? Sorry I just meant these two commands: automake --version autoconf --version P

Re: make distcheck: cannot remove '../../po/lyx.pot'

Pavel Sanda wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: >> >> Can you reproduce now? > > Nope. Smells like automake/autoconf versions. What is your config? These versions produce the error for me: $ ./autogen.sh Using automake (GNU automake) 1.14.1 Using autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.69 Georg

Re: make distcheck: cannot remove '../../po/lyx.pot'

On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 01:24:45PM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > --- > > mkdir /tmp/tmp.EI1jW3t6A1 > > cd /path/to/git/repo > > git reset --hard > > git clean -xdf > > ./autogen.sh > > cd /tmp/tmp.EI1jW3t6A1 && /path/to/git/repo/configure > > --enable-build-type=pre --enab

Re: make distcheck: cannot remove '../../po/lyx.pot'

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > --- > mkdir /tmp/tmp.EI1jW3t6A1 > cd /path/to/git/repo > git reset --hard > git clean -xdf > ./autogen.sh > cd /tmp/tmp.EI1jW3t6A1 && /path/to/git/repo/configure --enable-build-type=pre > --enable-monolithic-build=no > make -j4 > make -j4 check > make -j4 distcheck > echo

Re: make distcheck: cannot remove '../../po/lyx.pot'

when using a build directory instead of an in-source > > >> build. > > > > > > Recipe? P > > > > Starting from the top level source directory: > > > > ./autogen.sh > > mkdir buildtest > > cd buildtest > > ../configure > >

Re: make distcheck: cannot remove '../../po/lyx.pot'

; > Recipe? P > > Starting from the top level source directory: > > ./autogen.sh > mkdir buildtest > cd buildtest > ../configure > make distcheck > > But since 'make distcheck' works if it is run directly in the source > directory it is probably no show

Re: make distcheck: cannot remove '../../po/lyx.pot'

./autogen.sh mkdir buildtest cd buildtest ../configure make distcheck But since 'make distcheck' works if it is run directly in the source directory it is probably no show stopper for the beta (but we should create a bug in trac). Georg

Re: make distcheck: cannot remove '../../po/lyx.pot'

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > (although I still don't understand why). I get another instance of the > same error though when using a build directory instead of an in-source > build. Recipe? P

Re: make distcheck: cannot remove '../../po/lyx.pot'

u want to keep in your LyX directory > >> # first do 'git reset --hard' > >> # then 'git clean -xdf' > >> ./autogen.sh && ./configure --enable-build-type=pre --disable-nls && make > >> && make check && make distcheck

Re: make distcheck: cannot remove '../../po/lyx.pot'

gt; # then 'git clean -xdf' >> ./autogen.sh && ./configure --enable-build-type=pre --disable-nls && make >> && make check && make distcheck && echo "ALL TESTS PASSED" >> >> ... >> >> rm: cannot remove

Re: make distcheck: cannot remove '../../po/lyx.pot'

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 03/01/2016 13:08, Kornel Benko a écrit : >> I think, we cannot solve it now. As I understand, automake expects that >> the source dir will not be changed, but our po-handling changes not only >> lyx.pot but also all files in the po directory. Lyx.pot is only the fi

Re: make distcheck: cannot remove '../../po/lyx.pot'

Le 03/01/2016 13:08, Kornel Benko a écrit : I think, we cannot solve it now. As I understand, automake expects that the source dir will not be changed, but our po-handling changes not only lyx.pot but also all files in the po directory. Lyx.pot is only the first one found. Normally, a fresh un

Re: make distcheck: cannot remove '../../po/lyx.pot'

Am Sonntag, 20. Dezember 2015 um 16:39:33, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 10:19:59AM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > It would be nice to fix this so that we can run all of the compilation > > > tests before releasing beta. > > > > Did you try to bise

Re: make distcheck: cannot remove '../../po/lyx.pot'

On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 12:17:08PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote: > > It would be nice to fix this so that we can run all of the compilation > > tests before releasing beta. > > Definitely. Would you say this should be a beta blocker? If so, what about an alpha blocker? If so, I will make this clear i

Re: make distcheck: cannot remove '../../po/lyx.pot'

Le 19/12/2015 12:17, Georg Baum a écrit : This code is executed in build-dir/po, so ../../po/lyx.pot points to the file in the source tree. lyx.pot exists and is writable, so the only thing I can imagine is some trickery that tries to forbid writing into the source tree by faking permissions, but

Re: make distcheck: cannot remove '../../po/lyx.pot'

e: > > > > > > > > I have no idea why, but the attached patch seems to fix 'make > > > > > distcheck' for me. > > > > > > > > > > Can it go in? > > > > > > > > It is strange that it can fix an

Re: make distcheck: cannot remove '../../po/lyx.pot'

On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 10:19:59AM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > It would be nice to fix this so that we can run all of the compilation > > tests before releasing beta. > > Did you try to bisect? Pavel Yes I did this for a previous instance of the error. I bisected on two

Re: make distcheck: cannot remove '../../po/lyx.pot'

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > It would be nice to fix this so that we can run all of the compilation > tests before releasing beta. Did you try to bisect? Pavel

Re: make distcheck: cannot remove '../../po/lyx.pot'

Scott Kostyshak wrote: > I am still seeing the error. I don't know if it is another instance of > it or the same one. Is there anyone that does not see the error that > would be interested in investigating? If so, I will give the precise > steps to reproduce. I get it as well. It seems to be caus

  1   2   >