> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Lars> | Lars> | BTW it might be nice to have "lyxclient file.lyx" open
Lars> | Lars> file.lyx in an | existing
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> | BTW it might be nice to have "lyxclient file.lyx" open
| Lars> file.lyx in an | existing LyX instance.
>
| Lars> would it? I am not sure.
>
| We do not have any use for a n
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> | BTW it might be nice to have "lyxclient file.lyx" open
Lars> file.lyx in an | existing LyX instance.
Lars> would it? I am not sure.
We do not have any use for a non-option argument currently, so it does
not conflict with exi
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
"Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
| Lars> | Lars> I have added the lyxclient to the buil
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
Lars> | Lars> I have added the lyxclient to the build process. I have
Lars> also | Lars> taken the opurtunity
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
| Lars> I have added the lyxclient to the build process. I have also
| Lars> taken the opurtunity to clean it up a bit.
>
| I need the following patch to buld outside of source tree.
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> I have added the lyxclient to the build process. I have also
Lars> taken the opurtunity to clean it up a bit.
I need the following patch to buld outside of source tree.
OK?
JMarc
Index: src/client/ChangeLog
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> If you have opinions on which direction we should push the lyxclient
> please pipe up.
Nice pun, given that it communicates using pipes.
--
Angus
I have added the lyxclient to the build process. I have also taken the
opurtunity to clean it up a bit.
I am planning to split it into a library (that other clients can use
as well), and a binarary (as we have now).
It is also possible that I will move the current lyxserver into its
own dir: ser