> > IMO you are right. If you write the script I'd update the internal devs
> > linuxdocs, including Allan's gui-indep guide.
>
> Where are those documents? (I suspect lyx 1.1 ...)
in the subdir development/Code_rules/
All developers should know that.
Alejandro
Alejandro Aguilar Sierra wrote:
>
> On Fri, 4 Dec 1998, José Abílio de Oliveira Matos wrote:
>
> > I'm open to suggestion since I do not see other alternatives, and to do
> > that with the present lexical analyser seems to be very tricky. Am I wrong
> > here?
>
> IMO you are right. If you wri
On Fri, 4 Dec 1998, José Abílio de Oliveira Matos wrote:
> I'm open to suggestion since I do not see other alternatives, and to do
> that with the present lexical analyser seems to be very tricky. Am I wrong
> here?
IMO you are right. If you write the script I'd update the internal devs
linuxd
Hi,
One of the main problem with linuxdoc is the use in in the lyxformat of
the LatexDel inset.
For example, I want to translate:
\begin_inset LatexDel \ref{
\end_inset
amigo
\begin_inset LatexDel }{
\end_inset
friends
\begin_inset LatexDel }
\end_inset
to ---
José Abílio de Oliveira Matos wrote:
>
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >
> > > "José" == José Abílio de Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > José> I have Jean-Marc's writing syndrome ;-), so this sentence is
> > José> incomplete. It should be read as:
> >
> > Ah, you noticed
> "José" == José Abílio de Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
José> I have Jean-Marc's writing syndrome ;-), so this sentence is
José> incomplete. It should be read as:
Ah, you noticed that too? Maybe I should really re-read things before
sending them, then. %-|
JMarc
"Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen" wrote:
>
> > > How do you use it?
> >
> > sgmltools --backend=foo doc.sgml
> >
> > where foo is the available backend to transform the docbook document. In a
> > simple way is this, it is also possible to change the stylesheets to change
> > the final output, but th
> > How do you use it?
>
> sgmltools --backend=foo doc.sgml
>
> where foo is the available backend to transform the docbook document. In a
> simple way is this, it is also possible to change the stylesheets to change
> the final output, but that is another story...
Maybe you can provide an
"Asger K. Alstrup Nielsen" wrote:
[...]
> > There are only three places where the, latex related, source needs to be
> > changed:
> > * The form that reads the reference, needs an extra field to read the
> > extra parameter for SGML based outputs.
-- this is the step that most scare
> I have played a little with \ref and now, after the enlightment that
> reading the source always offers ;-) I know the answer.
>
> There are only three places where the, latex related, source needs to be
> changed:
> * The form that reads the reference, needs an extra field to read the
José Abílio de Oliveira Matos wrote:
>
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >
> > > "José" == José Abílio de Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > José> Is it possible/desirable to have an extra field within the
> > José> \ref inset? The goal is to have a unique interface for
> > J
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> > "José" == José Abílio de Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> José> Is it possible/desirable to have an extra field within the
> José> \ref inset? The goal is to have a unique interface for
> José> cross-references, between the latex, linuxdoc,
> "José" == José Abílio de Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
José> Is it possible/desirable to have an extra field within the
José> \ref inset? The goal is to have a unique interface for
José> cross-references, between the latex, linuxdoc, and docbook
José> layouts. The extra fiel
"Lars Gullik Bjønnes" wrote:
>
> *Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes:
> | If you can remove that, this would be fine.
>
> Agree.
>
> Lgb
Hello,
I have have a few question related with this:
Is it possible/desirable to have an extra field within the \ref inset?
The goal is to h
On Sat, 28 Nov 1998, Asger Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
> José, do you have the option of ftp'ing the patch to nazgul, and then
> telnet into nazgul, and commit it yourself? That would probably be the
> best solution in the long run.
Not this time. The patch is already appliead.
Alejandro
> Jean-Marc or Lars, any one available, or do I wait for Asger to commit the
> code?
José, do you have the option of ftp'ing the patch to nazgul, and then telnet
into nazgul, and commit it yourself? That would probably be the best solution
in the long run.
> Ok, if have implemented the linu
*Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes:
| If you can remove that, this would be fine.
Agree.
Lgb
> "José" == José Abílio de Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
José> Hi all, Asger wrote:
>> Hmm, at the moment, I don't have access to it (it's on another
>> machine). Maybe you could send it to Lgb and Jean-Marc for
>> inclusion?
>>
>> I won't be able to commit it until next Monday
or Asger to commit the
code?
Reporting from the dark zone of lyx linuxdoc ;-)
Ok, if have implemented the linuxdoc support for footnotes (+3 lines,
basically :-)
The other issue I would like to discuss here is the linuxdoc legacy. Our
major problem is the LatexDelInset, right?
My proposal i
19 matches
Mail list logo
