On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 06:11:49PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
> what a joke ...
> the one from the rh ftp site was
That would be the pre-release snapshot. Download gcc-[core,g++]-3.2.tar.gz instead.
> voss@maria:~> gcc --version
> gcc (GCC) 3.2.1 20020903 (prerelease)
I long deleted 3.2, but be
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 05:46:24PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
>
>> then you have the one with the patch, like the one from rh,
>> but suse8.1 comes without it.
>
> I compiled it from ftp.gnu.org tarball.
>
>> what does your gcc --version says?
>
> 3.2 ;)
what a joke ...
the one from the rh ftp
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 05:37:00PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
> it is a gcc bug! rh and suse have the right patch on their
Then why did lyx compile fine for me using gcc 3.2 whilst it was failing
for others using vendor gcc's ?
john
--
"Trolls like content too."
- Bob Abooey, /.
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 05:46:24PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
> then you have the one with the patch, like the one from rh,
> but suse8.1 comes without it.
I compiled it from ftp.gnu.org tarball.
> what does your gcc --version says?
3.2 ;)
(I'm using 3.2.1 now, but it was 3.2 at the time)
reg
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 05:37:00PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
>
>> it is a gcc bug! rh and suse have the right patch on their
>
> Then why did lyx compile fine for me using gcc 3.2 whilst it was
> failing
for others using vendor gcc's ?
then you have the one with the patch, like the one from r
> John Levon wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 10:09:11AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>
>>> Most distributions have added some "vendor patches" that fix this
>>> problem. So IMHO it is a vendor problem.
>>>
>>> RH f.ex. does not have this problem. (and suse do have it)
>>
>> it's a buggy
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 05:32:40PM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
> > to report bug to suse to but nobody has said they've done so
>
> I just did.
Thanks.
> Nobody really said it is a SuSE bug so far, I thought it were a gcc bug.
I did mention at some point that the gcc 3.2 tarball was
John Levon wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 10:09:11AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> Most distributions have added some "vendor patches" that fix this
>> problem. So IMHO it is a vendor problem.
>>
>> RH f.ex. does not have this problem. (and suse do have it)
>
> it's a buggy suse pat
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 10:09:11AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Most distributions have added some "vendor patches" that fix this
> problem. So IMHO it is a vendor problem.
>
> RH f.ex. does not have this problem. (and suse do have it)
it's a buggy suse patch. clean 3.2 tarball is fine.
Michael Schmitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hi,
|
| are there any plans to provide a workaround for the following problem:
no
| g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../../src -I../../../../boost
| -isystem /usr/X11R6/include -g -O -fno-exceptions -W -Wall -Winline -c
| cregex.cpp -MT cregex.l
Hi,
are there any plans to provide a workaround for the following problem:
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../../../src -I../../../../boost
-isystem /usr/X11R6/include -g -O -fno-exceptions -W -Wall -Winline -c
cregex.cpp -MT cregex.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/cregex.TPlo
--
Prepa
Moritz Moeller-Herrmann schrieb:
get the latest gcc-3.2.1 prerelease from SuSE or
Do you know of any packages? I have only found packages for AMD-x64 for
SuSE.
if I remember well then the original 8.1 package was gcc 3.2-36
and the newest from a mirror is 3.2-43 (f. ex: at ftp://ftp.
Herbert Voss wrote:
> Moritz Moeller-Herrmann schrieb:
>
>>I get an internal compiler error at the very start of lyx compilation.
>>I use qt-3.1 and gcc-3.2 on SuSE-8.1.
[...]
> get the latest gcc-3.2.1 prerelease from SuSE or
Do you know of any packages? I have only found packages for AMD-x64 f
Moritz Moeller-Herrmann schrieb:
I get an internal compiler error at the very start of lyx compilation. While
I realize, that this bug is probably at gcc, it should still be worked
around by lyx, as very few people will upgrade from gcc-3.2 to get a
working lyx-1.3.
The error did come up several
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 01:57:09PM +0100, Moritz Moeller-Herrmann wrote:
> I get an internal compiler error at the very start of lyx compilation. While
> I realize, that this bug is probably at gcc, it should still be worked
> around by lyx, as very few people will upgrade from gcc-3.2 to get a
>
I get an internal compiler error at the very start of lyx compilation. While
I realize, that this bug is probably at gcc, it should still be worked
around by lyx, as very few people will upgrade from gcc-3.2 to get a
working lyx-1.3.
The error did come up several times, so I think it is software r
16 matches
Mail list logo
