Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| João Assirati contributed a 'less horrible, less leaky' putenv function in
| src/support/putenv.C. It's currently used only by src/lyxsocket.C.
>
| We also have putEnv in src/support/filetools.C. It has the same signature
| as
João Assirati contributed a 'less horrible, less leaky' putenv function in
src/support/putenv.C. It's currently used only by src/lyxsocket.C.
We also have putEnv in src/support/filetools.C. It has the same signature
as João's function but uses either ::setenv or ::pute
>> | Changes by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]02/11/27 14:46:15
>> |
>> | Modified files:
>> |lyx-devel/src/: LyXAction.C
>> |lyx-devel/src/support/: filetools.C
>> |
>> | Log message:
>> |As André says, what a a waste of time, but at leas
> | Modified files:
> | lyx-devel/src/: LyXAction.C
> | lyx-devel/src/support/: filetools.C
> |
> | Log message:
> | As André says, what a a waste of time, but at least it's now consistent.
>
> you are aware that "size_t(0)" would work as well?
So? The t
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 12:13:47PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> ('you' here is _me_ not _you_)
Indeed. I should have made it explicit by saying "Look as We are right".
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Friday 03 May 2002 11:13 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> | On Friday 03 May 2002 7:09 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> >> On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 08:18:32PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> >> > I think t
On Friday 03 May 2002 11:13 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | On Friday 03 May 2002 7:09 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> >> On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 08:18:32PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >> > I think that
> >> >
> >> >str.substr(0) == str
> >
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Friday 03 May 2002 7:09 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>> On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 08:18:32PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> > I think that
>> >
>> >str.substr(0) == str
>> >str.substr(0, ) == str
>> >
>> > easy to check though.
>>
>>
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Angus Leeming wrote:
> + if (lyxerr.level() & Debug::GRAPHICS) {
> + string const print_str = (str.size() > 60) ?
> + str.substr(0,60) : str;
> + lyxerr << "Scanstring: " << print_str << en
se?
Angus
Index: ChangeLog
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/support/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision 1.102
diff -u -p -r1.102 ChangeLog
--- ChangeLog 2 May 2002 16:55:25 - 1.102
+++ ChangeLog 3 May 2
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 08:18:32PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I think that
>
>str.substr(0) == str
>str.substr(0, ) == str
>
> easy to check though.
21.3.6.7 basic_string::substr[lib.string::substr]
basic_string
substr(size_type pos = 0, si
;
>> >>2002-05-02 Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >>
>> >> * filetools.C: getline -> std::getline.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>maybe that I'm getting old, but this is in my ChangeLog, but
>> >>not changed in my filetools.C and I
On Thursday 02 May 2002 6:03 pm, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> > On Thursday 02 May 2002 5:17 pm, Herbert Voss wrote:
> >>I don't who committed this:
> >>
> >>2002-05-02 Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>
> >>
Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Thursday 02 May 2002 5:17 pm, Herbert Voss wrote:
>
>>I don't who committed this:
>>
>>2002-05-02 Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> * filetools.C: getline -> std::getline.
>>
>>
>>maybe
On Thursday 02 May 2002 5:17 pm, Herbert Voss wrote:
> I don't who committed this:
>
> 2002-05-02 Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * filetools.C: getline -> std::getline.
>
>
> maybe that I'm getting old, but this is in my ChangeLog, but
I don't who committed this:
2002-05-02 Herbert Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* filetools.C: getline -> std::getline.
maybe that I'm getting old, but this is in my ChangeLog, but
not changed in my filetools.C and I never send such patch.
It's part of the
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 12:46:56PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | -cmdret const c = do_popen(kpsecmd);
> | -
> | -lyxerr[Debug::LATEX] << "kpse status = " << c.first << "\n"
> | -<< "kpse result = `" <
where p is never used afterwards...
Andre'
--
André Pönitz .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
? texput.log
Index: filetools.C
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/support/filetools.C,v
retr
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 01:23:06PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 12:57:23PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | > |
> | > | > Lgb
> | > |
> | > | On a related issue, I want to move the funct
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 12:57:23PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > |
| > | > Lgb
| > |
| > | On a related issue, I want to move the function that is in
| > | src/insets/includeinset.C,
| >
| > What do you need it for a
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 12:57:23PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> |
> | > Lgb
> |
> | On a related issue, I want to move the function that is in
> | src/insets/includeinset.C,
>
> What do you need it for again? Is it for a temporary unique filename?
> In what domain, file, dir
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 12:42:57PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| >
| > Note the function name: "IsLyX_FILENAME_" this is not really a check
| > that this is in fact a lyx file. So what we should check is that this
| > regexp holds: "
On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 12:42:57PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> Note the function name: "IsLyX_FILENAME_" this is not really a check
> that this is in fact a lyx file. So what we should check is that this
> regexp holds: "^.*\.lyx(\..+)$"
Will you do it?
If not I can do it.
>
Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 12:26:49PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| >
| > This change:
| >
| > 2001-02-27 Jos=E9 Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| >
| > * filetools.C (IsLyXFilename):
| > * file
This change:
2001-02-27 José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* filetools.C (IsLyXFilename):
* filetools.C (IsSGMLFilename): test if extension is suffix and not
only containned.
Why was this done?
This will AFAIS it impossible to have filenames like testfile.lyx.i
On Thu, Jun 08, 2000 at 03:49:17PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Andre> retval is not defined if HAVE_SETENV is not defined. One
> Andre> possible solution:
>
> You mean neither HAVE_SETENV and HAVE_PUTENV are defined? On what
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> retval is not defined if HAVE_SETENV is not defined. One
Andre> possible solution:
You mean neither HAVE_SETENV and HAVE_PUTENV are defined? On what
system did this occur? I guess in this case it would be better to set
retval to a
retval is not defined if HAVE_SETENV is not defined.
One possible solution:
- snip ---
Index: filetools.C
===
RCS file: /usr/local/lyx/cvsroot/lyx-devel/src/support/filetools.C,v
retrieving
On 23 Aug 1999 15:51:19 +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>It is irrevalent, since, except for a few, all the X11 apps here (including
>LyX) are single threaded. -Zmt flag in the compiler/linker does not make
>your application multithreaded, nor even thread safe.
>> Attached follows the very exp
29 matches
Mail list logo
