Le 01/11/2010 14:16, Yann Disser a écrit :
Well, as I said, with automatic sync I do not think it would be so
much of a nightmare anymore. And, for me at least, editing
formula-heavy .tex is also not very enjoyable.
A typical example of when tex<->lyx breaks with formulas is when people
use ``h
>
> I agree it would be nice. But it's almost impossible. The problem is that
> (La)TeX provides multiple ways (packages) for achieving the same thing. LyX
> will never be able to support them all, so either your LaTeX collaborators
> will needs to know what LyX supports (which is not what t
On 1. Nov 2010, at 14:22, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Yann Disser wrote:
>> Your arguments make sense. However, I think many people must have my
>> problem. Perhaps it would be sufficient to provide a way to keep the .lyx
>> file and the .tex file in sync. Whenever one of the two would get change
On 01/11/2010 9:02 AM, Yann Disser wrote:
On 1. Nov 2010, at 14:42, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Yann Disser wrote:
I wish I had time to help you with that (sounds like fun ;-) )... Perhaps
sometime in the future.
Don't count on it. We have many reasons for not using the tex file format
native
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> A slightly simpler problem is to allow users to modify the generated
> preamble. Sort of the same problem, but simpler and useful as well.
I use the attached lyxpp.py.
To use
0) Put lyxpp.py in the path.
1) Set the LaTeX (pdflatex)
On 11/01/2010 09:16 AM, Yann Disser wrote:
On 1. Nov 2010, at 14:09, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Yann Disser wrote:
Your arguments make sense. However, I think many people must have my problem.
Perhaps it would be sufficient to provide a way to keep the .lyx file and the
.tex file in sync.
On 11/01/2010 09:16 AM, Yann Disser wrote:
On 1. Nov 2010, at 14:09, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Yann Disser wrote:
Your arguments make sense. However, I think many people must have my problem.
Perhaps it would be sufficient to provide a way to keep the .lyx file and the
.tex file in sync.
Yann Disser wrote:
> Your arguments make sense. However, I think many people must have my
> problem. Perhaps it would be sufficient to provide a way to keep the .lyx
> file and the .tex file in sync. Whenever one of the two would get changed,
> lyx would automatically import/export. This approach w
On 1. Nov 2010, at 14:09, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Yann Disser wrote:
>> Your arguments make sense. However, I think many people must have my
>> problem. Perhaps it would be sufficient to provide a way to keep the .lyx
>> file and the .tex file in sync. Whenever one of the two would get changed,
>
Yann Disser wrote:
> Your arguments make sense. However, I think many people must have my problem.
> Perhaps it would be sufficient to provide a way to keep the .lyx file and the
> .tex file in sync. Whenever one of the two would get changed, lyx would
> automatically import/export. This approac
On 1. Nov 2010, at 14:42, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Yann Disser wrote:
>> I wish I had time to help you with that (sounds like fun ;-) )... Perhaps
>> sometime in the future.
>
> Don't count on it. We have many reasons for not using the tex file format
> natively. For instance, LyX is storin
A slightly simpler problem is to allow users to modify the generated
preamble. Sort of the same problem, but simpler and useful as well.
Op 1 nov 2010 13:39 schreef "Yann Disser" :
On 1. Nov 2010, at 13:19, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 11/01/2010 07:56 AM, Yann Disser wrote:
>>
>> ...
I wish I had
Yann Disser wrote:
> I wish I had time to help you with that (sounds like fun ;-) )... Perhaps
> sometime in the future.
Don't count on it. We have many reasons for not using the tex file format
natively. For instance, LyX is storing some information for which no tex
syntax exists (and which do
On 1. Nov 2010, at 13:19, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 11/01/2010 07:56 AM, Yann Disser wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for your reply. I am sorry for duplicating a feature request, I did
>> not take the time to look through existing ones...
>>
> Not a problem. I just meant it wasn't something we'd overlooked
On 11/01/2010 07:56 AM, Yann Disser wrote:
Thanks for your reply. I am sorry for duplicating a feature request, I
did not take the time to look through existing ones...
Not a problem. I just meant it wasn't something we'd overlooked.
I hope that eventually somebody will implement it, though
On 11/01/2010 05:38 AM, Yann Disser wrote:
Hi everybody.
I do not know where to post a feature request, so I send it to this list --
hope that's ok.
I use LyX every day at work (doing my PhD), and I am really really happy with
it!
There is one thing I am missing though, since I collaborate a
On 1. Nov 2010, at 12:51, Richard Heck wrote:
> On 11/01/2010 05:38 AM, Yann Disser wrote:
>> Hi everybody.
>>
>> I do not know where to post a feature request, so I send it to this list --
>> hope that's ok.
>>
>> I use LyX every day at work (doing my PhD), and I am really really happy
>> wit
Hi everybody.
I do not know where to post a feature request, so I send it to this list --
hope that's ok.
I use LyX every day at work (doing my PhD), and I am really really happy with
it!
There is one thing I am missing though, since I collaborate a lot with people
that I cannot convince to u
18 matches
Mail list logo
