01/09/2013 20:17, Vincent van Ravesteijn:
Vincent, can I commit this somewhere?
JMarc
I put it in.
Thanks!
JMarc
Op 17-7-2013 11:25, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schreef:
Le 16/07/2013 06:48, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
OK, let's keep it as it is right now. Shall I commit it somewhere
now or
wait?
I would put it into master. P
Vincent, can I commit this somewhere?
JMarc
I put it in.
Le 16/07/2013 06:48, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
OK, let's keep it as it is right now. Shall I commit it somewhere now or
wait?
I would put it into master. P
Vincent, can I commit this somewhere?
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> OK, let's keep it as it is right now. Shall I commit it somewhere now or
> wait?
I would put it into master. P
Le 11/07/2013 21:11, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Like this? What am I supposed to do with this patch now?
My guerrilla tactics would be to ask Vincent for objections
and if no raised in reasonable time I would commit to master :)
child only. This way a same key binding
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Like this? What am I supposed to do with this patch now?
My guerrilla tactics would be to ask Vincent for objections
and if no raised in reasonable time I would commit to master :)
> child only. This way a same key binding C-r would always view the full
> document.
On Tue, 09 Jul 2013 16:28:58 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
BTW, I am not very happy with the current bindings. I would think that
it is better to view/update master by default and has a special binding
for child only. This way a same key binding C-r would always view the
full document.
06/07/2013 04:31, Pavel Sanda:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
This make sense. Here is a proposed patch. Since I am not a master/child
Correction of doxy comment is needed.
Pavel
Like this? What am I supposed to do with this patch now?
BTW, I am not very happy with the current bindings. I woul
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> This make sense. Here is a proposed patch.
Thank you so much for the quick response!
Best,
Joon
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> This make sense. Here is a proposed patch. Since I am not a master/child
Correction of doxy comment is needed.
Pavel
On 07/05/2013 10:24 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
03/07/2013 03:49, Joon Ro:
I think it would be better to allow Update Master Document command in
actual master document. Currently in order to update the master
document, I have to use "Update Master Document" in child documents, but
if master
03/07/2013 03:49, Joon Ro:
I think it would be better to allow Update Master Document command in
actual master document. Currently in order to update the master
document, I have to use "Update Master Document" in child documents, but
if master document is activated, I have to use "Update Document
Hi,
I think it would be better to allow Update Master Document command in
actual master document. Currently in order to update the master document, I
have to use "Update Master Document" in child documents, but if master
document is activated, I have to use "Update Document", which is confusing.
13 matches
Mail list logo
