On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> It seems like I am the only one, who is - in theory - able to run LyX with
> Purify. Indeed, I really would like to do that but LyX 1.2cvs does not compile
> with SUN CC 6.0. In fact, the situation has become even worse since the last
> time I complain
Hello,
I think it does not make sense to consider GNU Checker as it requires to
recompile everything, including all libraries, e.g. xforms.
It seems like I am the only one, who is - in theory - able to run LyX with
Purify. Indeed, I really would like to do that but LyX 1.2cvs does not compile
w
On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 02:53:27PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Unfortunately, I cannot try this out under purify, since it only works
> with gcc 2.8.1 and we don't support that anymore :( We also have
> Insure++ here, but our licence has expired :( :(
>
> Are there other tools that could
> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dekel> On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 02:53:27PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Dekel> wrote:
>> Unfortunately, I cannot try this out under purify, since it only
>> works with gcc 2.8.1 and we don't support that anymore :( We also
>> have Insure++ her
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> | At last you see this too :)
>>
>> This seems like some memory corruption/uninitilaized variables
>> (more specifically the paragraph next pointer in the cloned
>> structure for use in undo)
John> phew, good, I thought it was just me. I
On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> Well it seems very strange that this does not happen with egcs 2.91.66 and
> also does not happen if you omit -O (no optimization), for me this seems like
> a bug in the 2.96.x compiler when optimizing!
>
> Jürgen
Quite possibly. I wonder if the
On 06-Apr-2001 John Levon wrote:
>> | At last you see this too :)
>>
>> This seems like some memory corruption/uninitilaized variables (more
>> specifically the paragraph next pointer in the cloned structure for
>> use in undo)
>
> phew, good, I thought it was just me. I couldn't reproduce this
> | At last you see this too :)
>
> This seems like some memory corruption/uninitilaized variables (more
> specifically the paragraph next pointer in the cloned structure for
> use in undo)
phew, good, I thought it was just me. I couldn't reproduce this at university
(compiler egcs 2.91.66) but
Juergen Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On 06-Apr-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| >
| > I am currently seeing crashes when inserting stuff in InsetTabular, do
| > others see this?
| >
| > It seems that the CreateUndo is doing something wrong (or that some
| > Clone... hmmm da hmm... is do
On 06-Apr-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> I am currently seeing crashes when inserting stuff in InsetTabular, do
> others see this?
>
> It seems that the CreateUndo is doing something wrong (or that some
> Clone... hmmm da hmm... is doing something wrong.)
At last you see this too :)
Try
I am currently seeing crashes when inserting stuff in InsetTabular, do
others see this?
It seems that the CreateUndo is doing something wrong (or that some
Clone... hmmm da hmm... is doing something wrong.)
--
Lgb
11 matches
Mail list logo
