José Matos wrote:
> > 2. people around the world are very curious :) last time the tarbal was
> > released and even before announcing it there was bugz request for bumping
> > new release under gentoo. i consider very bad release policy to have one
> > day lyx-x.y.z.tar.gz and the other day the sam
On Monday 04 August 2008 16:33:21 Pavel Sanda wrote:
> if you want the comments :)
Sure, that was the whole point of the message. :-)
> 1. if there are 'major bugs' which need to be fixed to have 'useful
> release' then there is no point of make any tarbal, i.e. to prepare tarbal
> only after bug
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
The patch was by Vincent van Ravesteijn, email above. Do we need a standard
permission from him?
Rh
Hi,
As I would like to contribute more in the future (because I am a daily
LyX-user), I hereby grant permission to license my contributions to LyX u
Vincent van Ravesteijn - TNW wrote:
The patch was by Vincent van Ravesteijn, email above. Do we need a standard
permission from him?
Rh
Hi,
As I would like to contribute more in the future (because I am a daily
LyX-user),
We would also like you to contribute more :-)
I hereby gr
> The patch was by Vincent van Ravesteijn, email above. Do we need a standard
> permission from him?
>
> Rh
Hi,
As I would like to contribute more in the future (because I am a daily
LyX-user), I hereby grant permission to license my contributions to LyX under
the GNU General Public License,
José Matos wrote:
On Monday 04 August 2008 16:13:08 rgheck wrote:
Yes, I understand. I was just asking about a "yes" you'd given to Abdel
regarding the attached.
Yes, the patch can be committed.
FWIW when I read my synthetic answer it took me a few seconds to understand
what it meant.
José Matos wrote:
> On Monday 04 August 2008 15:41:58 rgheck wrote:
> > I can apply it any time. Are we frozen, or should I go ahead?
> >
> > rh
>
> We are frozen. The goal of the freezing is to avoid having a release with
> crashes that make the testing useless. On the other hand the only way fo
On Monday 04 August 2008 16:13:08 rgheck wrote:
> Yes, I understand. I was just asking about a "yes" you'd given to Abdel
> regarding the attached.
Yes, the patch can be committed.
FWIW when I read my synthetic answer it took me a few seconds to understand
what it meant. :-)
> rh
--
José Abíli
José Matos wrote:
On Monday 04 August 2008 15:41:58 rgheck wrote:
I can apply it any time. Are we frozen, or should I go ahead?
rh
We are frozen. The goal of the freezing is to avoid having a release with
crashes that make the testing useless.
Yes, I understand. I was just askin
On Monday 04 August 2008 15:41:58 rgheck wrote:
> I can apply it any time. Are we frozen, or should I go ahead?
>
> rh
We are frozen. The goal of the freezing is to avoid having a release with
crashes that make the testing useless. On the other hand the only way for a
freeze to effective it need
José Matos wrote:
On Monday 04 August 2008 14:57:10 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
This has been reported earlier. Jose, I suggest to apply the patch for
the time bieng.
Yes.
I can apply it any time. Are we frozen, or should I go ahead?
rh
On Monday 04 August 2008 14:57:10 Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> This has been reported earlier. Jose, I suggest to apply the patch for
> the time bieng.
Yes.
> Abdel.
--
José Abílio
Neal Becker wrote:
Seen 2 crashes in short testing. Clicking around in Preferences gave this:
This has been reported earlier. Jose, I suggest to apply the patch for
the time bieng.
Abdel.
--- Begin Message ---
Hi,
I encountered a crash of LyX when clicking on the white space below a
Seen 2 crashes in short testing. Clicking around in Preferences gave this:
gdb) where
#0 lyx::frontend::PanelStack::switchPanel (this=0x1afe2b0, item=0x0,
previous=0x1b47610) at /usr/include/QtCore/qlist.h:89
#1 0
14 matches
Mail list logo
