José Matos wrote: > > 2. people around the world are very curious :) last time the tarbal was > > released and even before announcing it there was bugz request for bumping > > new release under gentoo. i consider very bad release policy to have one > > day lyx-x.y.z.tar.gz and the other day the same named tarbal with different > > contents. > > except the problems with hash-checks, which is not our problem after > > all, this is calling for lyx-bugzilla entries reported for wrong versions - > > exactly the last-time fixes, which could make problem for us. > > I can release it the tar ball as lyx-1.6.0rc2-svnxxxxx that should avoid this > problem.
yes, that would be better. pavel
