On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 02:02:07PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 03/03/2017 à 12:53, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> > On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 12:06:34PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > > Le 03/03/2017 à 11:52, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> > > > configure: error: cannot find suitab
Le 03/03/2017 à 12:53, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 12:06:34PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 03/03/2017 à 11:52, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> configure: error: cannot find suitable MyThes library (do not use
--without-included-mythes)
But I didn't use --without
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 02:35:44PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> commit 2f701e6a1c6b2a487a28c7a212421aef21f1b58c
> Author: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> Date: Thu Mar 2 14:31:43 2017 +0100
>
> Clarify configure help for 3rd party code
>
> The configure c
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: I'd imagine that most of this patch
Angus> should be added to the 1.3.x branch. Obviously not the 'new in
Angus> 1.4.x' stuff, but most everything else.
>> Is it useful to add the msvc-related stuff?
An
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Angus> I'd imagine that most of this patch should be added to the
> Angus> 1.3.x branch. Obviously not the 'new in 1.4.x' stuff, but most
> Angus> everything else.
>
> Is it useful to add the msvc-related stuff?
No. But it makes sense to show you exactly what had gon
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> I'd imagine that most of this patch should be added to the
Angus> 1.3.x branch. Obviously not the 'new in 1.4.x' stuff, but most
Angus> everything else.
Is it useful to add the msvc-related stuff? I'd think that 1.3.x is foar from
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Angus> But, CHECK_WITH_PSPELL is called only if CHECK_WITH_ASPELL
> Angus> fails and the AM_CONDITIONAL(USE_PSPELL...) is outside of the
> Angus> function.
>
> Indeed. Is this fixed now? I am lost... I see you have done a lot of
> good work this week!
Rather more tha
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> But, CHECK_WITH_PSPELL is called only if CHECK_WITH_ASPELL
Angus> fails and the AM_CONDITIONAL(USE_PSPELL...) is outside of the
Angus> function.
Indeed. Is this fixed now? I am lost... I see you have done a lot of
good work this we
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Angus> I found that I needed to
> Angus> initialise lyx_use_pspell=false before going on to test for
> Angus> pspell's presence or src/Makefile would always try and build
> Angus> pspell.C.
>
> That's a bit surprising seeing the code below:
>
> +AC_DEFUN([CHECK_WITH_
> "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Ok, the attached version of the patch removes [ap]spell.m4,
Angus> moving all the spelling stuff into a new spell.m4 with a
Angus> LYX_CHECK_SPELL_ENGINES functio
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Ok, the attached version of the patch removes [ap]spell.m4,
Angus> moving all the spelling stuff into a new spell.m4 with a
Angus> LYX_CHECK_SPELL_ENGINES function.
Very good.
Angus> I found that I needed to
Angus> initialise lyx
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Angus> One thing I noticed after I had posted my patch last night is
>> Angus> that there's a change of semantic here (ControlSpellchecker.C).
>> Angus> At the moment, the lyxrc variables are used to fall through to
>> Angu
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Angus> One thing I noticed after I had posted my patch last night is
> Angus> that there's a change of semantic here (ControlSpellchecker.C).
> Angus> At the moment, the lyxrc variables are used to fall through to
> Angus> Ispell at run time. With the new configure stu
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> One thing I noticed after I had posted my patch last night is
Angus> that there's a change of semantic here (ControlSpellchecker.C).
Angus> At the moment, the lyxrc variables are used to fall through to
Angus> Ispell at run time. Wi
> "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jean-Marc> After way too much time (this stuff takes long to get
Jean-Marc> right), here is my version of your patch. It has to be good
Jean-Marc> since diffstat says
Jean-Marc> 14 files changed, 218 insertions(+), 80 deletions
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Angus> Angus Leeming wrote:
>>> AC_DEFINE(SPELL_ENGINE, [$lyx_spell_engine], [Define as "ASPELL",
>>> "PSPELL" or "ISPELL" to specify the spell-checker.])
>
> Angus> I found it. AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED.
>
> Angus> The patch attached does what I/we want but I'm not sure i
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Angus Leeming wrote:
>> AC_DEFINE(SPELL_ENGINE, [$lyx_spell_engine], [Define as "ASPELL",
>> "PSPELL" or "ISPELL" to specify the spell-checker.])
Angus> I found it. AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED.
Angus> The patch attached does what I/we want
Angus Leeming wrote:
> AC_DEFINE(SPELL_ENGINE, [$lyx_spell_engine], [Define as "ASPELL",
> "PSPELL" or "ISPELL" to specify the spell-checker.])
I found it. AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED.
The patch attached does what I/we want but I'm not sure if it's optimal.
Perhaps you'd care to have a look?
--
Angus
c
Jean-Marc,
I tried to take your spelling ideas further, but have failed. What I think
I'd like is for config.h to contain
/* Define as "ASPELL", "PSPELL" or "ISPELL" to specify the spell-checker.*/
#define SPELL_ENGINE "ASPELL"
But at the moment I get
#define SPELL_ENGINE lyx_spell_engine
becau
I'm trying to remove the KDE config stuff, but I get :
src/mathed/Makefile.am:4: library used but `LIBTOOL' not defined in `configure.in'
from autogen.sh
I have /no/ idea why. This is breaking the build
any ideas ?
thanks
john
--
"The English approach to ideas is not to kill them, but
20 matches
Mail list logo
