On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 07:28:59AM +0200, Christoph Schmitz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Attached is my config.log.
The attachment looks corrupted. Pavel
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Hello,
Attached is my config.log.
Chris
<>
> Am 21.06.2023 um 12:50 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
>
> Le 21/06/2023 à 12:36, Christoph Schmitz a écrit :
>> Hello Scott,
>> Yes,
>> I deleted my local repository already a few times and started from scratch.
>
> Hello,
>
> Could you please s
Le 21/06/2023 à 12:36, Christoph Schmitz a écrit :
Hello Scott,
Yes,
I deleted my local repository already a few times and started from scratch.
Hello,
Could you please send your config.log file?
JMarc
These are the commands I use:
cd ~/chris/Git
git clone git://git.lyx.org/lyx LyX
cd
Hello Scott,
Yes,
I deleted my local repository already a few times and started from scratch.
These are the commands I use:
cd ~/chris/Git
git clone git://git.lyx.org/lyx LyX
cd LyX
./autogen.sh
./configure \
--with-version-suffix=-2.4 \
--with-libiconv-prefix=/usr \
--prefix=/Users/chris/D
On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 07:45:09AM +0200, Christoph Schmitz wrote:
>
> I have been unable to compile LyX 2.4 on macOS Sonoma for the past few days.
> The error message I am receiving is as follows:
>
> ...
> Making all in qt
> /Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/usr/bin/make all-am
> make[6]: N
I have been unable to compile LyX 2.4 on macOS Sonoma for the past few days.
The error message I am receiving is as follows:
...
Making all in qt
/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/usr/bin/make all-am
make[6]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'.
Making all in .
make[5]: Nothing to be done for `all
Le 11/11/2021 à 23:30, john kennan a écrit :
I'm using Gmail, looking at the Mail Archive. I can send messages to the
list, but I see no way to connect what I'm sending with what I'm
replying to.
There is something I do not understand. You are subscribed, but read
lyx-devel through the mail a
I'm using Gmail, looking at the Mail Archive. I can send messages to the
list, but I see no way to connect what I'm sending with what I'm replying
to.
John
-- Forwarded message -
From: john kennan
Date: Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 12:00 PM
Subject: Re: compiling LyX
To:
Le 11/11/2021 à 19:00, john kennan a écrit :
I don't know how to reply to messages on the list (I'm already subscribed)
Hello John,
What is the problem? That you answer to sender instead?
What are you using for your emails?
JMarc
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists
I don't know how to reply to messages on the list (I'm already subscribed)
Edited the wiki (https://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/Git) to say that one must
change to the lyx directory after the first couple of steps
John
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 11:14 AM john kennan wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'd like to be able to
://git.lyx.org/lyx"
That will create a directory called "lyx" wherever you run that command.
After cloning, then you need to hope that Stephan can help you :). I
think he has a build script for compiling LyX on macOS.
Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
lyx-devel m
Hi
I'd like to be able to compile LyX (on Mac OS Big Sur).
I tried following the instructions on https://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/Git
Got as far as this:
(base) jk@jkmac-3 ~ % git config --global user.name jkennan
(base) jk@jkmac-3 ~ % git config --global user.email jken...@gmail.com
(base) jk@jkmac-3
On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 02:58:19PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Sat, 16 Oct 2021 14:50:54 +0200
> schrieb pdv :
>
> > A similar modification is needed when building with CMake on MacOS.
> >
> > I've included module SvgWidgets with qt6 and MacExtras with previous
> > versions (I have checked b
Am Sat, 16 Oct 2021 14:50:54 +0200
schrieb pdv :
> A similar modification is needed when building with CMake on MacOS.
>
> I've included module SvgWidgets with qt6 and MacExtras with previous
> versions (I have checked builds on MacOS with qt6 and qt5, but not with
> qt4). (patch included)
> I
On 12/10/2021 21:36, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 01:15:52PM +0200, Christoph Schmitz wrote:
macOS Monterey Version 12.0 Beta (21A5543b) and Qt 6.2.0
The problem, which first appeared about two weeks ago, still exists. I compile
LyX once a day to see if it is fixed, but it
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 01:15:52PM +0200, Christoph Schmitz wrote:
> macOS Monterey Version 12.0 Beta (21A5543b) and Qt 6.2.0
>
> The problem, which first appeared about two weeks ago, still exists. I
> compile LyX once a day to see if it is fixed, but it is not. I still can't
> compile LyX und
Am Tue, 12 Oct 2021 13:15:52 +0200
schrieb Christoph Schmitz :
> QSvgWidget
You need the file 'QSvgWidget' apparently. Here, on linux and QT5, it is in
package
libqt5svg5-dev:
/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt5/QtSvg/QSvgWidget
On my self compiled QT6 it is also existent under
/6.0.2/Sr
macOS Monterey Version 12.0 Beta (21A5543b) and Qt 6.2.0
The problem, which first appeared about two weeks ago, still exists. I compile
LyX once a day to see if it is fixed, but it is not. I still can't compile LyX
under macOS anymore. I have the same issue on two computers (one with Intel
proc
macOS Monterey Version 12.0 Beta (21A5534d) and Qt 6.1.3Since a few days I can't compile LyX under macOS anymore. I have the same issue on two computers (one with Intel processor, the other with M1 processor).Attached you will find the complete error message. The compiler does not find QSvgWidget a
Am Donnerstag, 28. Februar 2019 14:22:14 CET schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
:
> Le 28/02/2019 à 13:01, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> > Am Donnerstag, 28. Februar 2019 11:56:57 CET schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> > :
> >> Le 28/02/2019 à 11:36, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> Note that isalnum depends on th
On 28/02/2019 12:04, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 28/02/2019 à 08:50, Daniel a écrit :
Compiling on Windows 10 with VS 2017 used to work. But now I get an
error message when trying to compile LyX:
Error C2146
syntax error: missing ')' before identifier 'or'
LyX (application
Le 28/02/2019 à 13:01, Kornel Benko a écrit :
Am Donnerstag, 28. Februar 2019 11:56:57 CET schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
:
Le 28/02/2019 à 11:36, Kornel Benko a écrit :
Note that isalnum depends on the current locale, which is not a good
idea at all. We want to use unicode stuff.
Good to know
Am Donnerstag, 28. Februar 2019 11:56:57 CET schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
:
> Le 28/02/2019 à 11:36, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> >> Note that isalnum depends on the current locale, which is not a good
> >> idea at all. We want to use unicode stuff.
> >
> > Good to know. I was not aware of textutils.
Le 28/02/2019 à 08:50, Daniel a écrit :
Compiling on Windows 10 with VS 2017 used to work. But now I get an
error message when trying to compile LyX:
Error C2146
syntax error: missing ')' before identifier 'or'
LyX (applications\LyX\LyX)
C:\Users\Daniel\lyx\devel\lyx\src\
Le 28/02/2019 à 11:36, Kornel Benko a écrit :
Note that isalnum depends on the current locale, which is not a good
idea at all. We want to use unicode stuff.
Good to know. I was not aware of textutils.h, shame on me.
I did not see an exact equivalent to isalnum, so I do not know what you
are
Am Donnerstag, 28. Februar 2019 10:53:15 CET schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
:
> Le 28/02/2019 à 09:33, Kornel Benko a écrit :
> >>Error C2672
> >>'std::isalnum': no matching overloaded function found
> >>LyX (applications\LyX\LyX)
> >>C:\Users\Daniel\lyx\devel\lyx\src\lyxf
On 28/02/2019 09:33, Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 28. Februar 2019 08:50:04 CET schrieb Daniel :
But next I get:
Error C2672
'std::isalnum': no matching overloaded function found
LyX (applications\LyX\LyX)
C:\Users\Daniel\lyx\devel\lyx\src\lyxfin
Le 28/02/2019 à 09:33, Kornel Benko a écrit :
Error C2672
'std::isalnum': no matching overloaded function found
LyX (applications\LyX\LyX)
C:\Users\Daniel\lyx\devel\lyx\src\lyxfind.cpp
2866
The line in question reads:
if (std::isalnum(t
Am Donnerstag, 28. Februar 2019 08:50:04 CET schrieb Daniel :
> Compiling on Windows 10 with VS 2017 used to work. But now I get an
> error message when trying to compile LyX:
>
> Error C2146
> syntax error: missing ')' before identifier 'or'
> LyX (applications\LyX\LyX)
>
Compiling on Windows 10 with VS 2017 used to work. But now I get an
error message when trying to compile LyX:
Error C2146
syntax error: missing ')' before identifier 'or'
LyX (applications\LyX\LyX)
C:\Users\Daniel\lyx\devel\lyx\src\BufferParams.cpp
3293
Thank you
On 11/11/2016 03:56 PM, Stephan Witt wrote:
Am 11.11.2016 um 03:37 schrieb JC Clark :
I am not able to compile lyx 2.2.2
I am on Centos 7 Linux .
Any thoughts
Please send the file config.log.
IMO, it’s better to discuss this on the developers list.
So I’ve CCed lyx-devel.
AFAIK
Am 11.11.2016 um 03:37 schrieb JC Clark :
>
> I am not able to compile lyx 2.2.2
>
> I am on Centos 7 Linux .
>
>
> Any thoughts
Please send the file config.log.
IMO, it’s better to discuss this on the developers list.
So I’ve CCed lyx-devel.
AFAIK there is a LyX package for Fedora. Perhaps
Am 01.11.2015 um 22:02 schrieb Georg Baum:
Peter Kümmel wrote:
For iconv and hunspell one can find some CMakeLists.txt at github, not
ready for MSVC but usable as starting point. AFAIk zlib already ships
with cmake files.
Would it be an option to add tripped down iconv, hunspell and zlib sourc
Peter Kümmel wrote:
> For iconv and hunspell one can find some CMakeLists.txt at github, not
> ready for MSVC but usable as starting point. AFAIk zlib already ships
> with cmake files.
>
> Would it be an option to add tripped down iconv, hunspell and zlib sources
> to lyx and to build them as sta
d by other
projects.
a mixture of different kinds of dependencies: The ones I mentioned are
needed for compiling LyX, the others like python and ghostscript are for
building the installer or running LyX. In my initial answer I did not think
of the latter. I believe that we do not need to do much a
Op 31-10-2015 om 14:44 schreef PhilipPirrip:
On 10/31/2015 09:27 AM, PhilipPirrip wrote:
Thanks, David. It did work with Qt 4.8.6
First thing I noticed, though, is that most icons are missing. Have to
investigate. I remember seeing a similar issue here on the list
recently.
The errors reporte
On 10/31/2015 09:27 AM, PhilipPirrip wrote:
Thanks, David. It did work with Qt 4.8.6
First thing I noticed, though, is that most icons are missing. Have to
investigate. I remember seeing a similar issue here on the list recently.
The errors reported in the message pane are of this kind
GuiAppli
switched to Qt 4.8.6 rather than Qt 5.4 or 5.5. I
don't exactly recall if that switch was the silver bullet for this error, but I
know I haven't been able to compile LyX yet using Qt 5.x on Windows. Perhaps try
compiling LyX with Qt 4.8.6 (keeping all other config the same), and see if
part of getting
everything to match INSTALL.Win32 and compile, I switched to Qt 4.8.6 rather
than Qt 5.4 or 5.5. I don't exactly recall if that switch was the silver
bullet for this error, but I know I haven't been able to compile LyX yet using
Qt 5.x on Windows. Perhaps try compiling
Hello!
I'm trying to compile LyX for Windows: WinXP VirtualBox, Visual Studio
2010, Qt 5.5, all by the instructions in INSTALL.Win32
No matter what I do in CMake config, the compilation ends with the
messages I give below, and I have no idea what's happening and how to
fix it.
24> -- Inst
ownloaded and compiled on the fly?
AFAIK iconv, zlib, hunspell and gettext. Unfortunately the zip file contains
a mixture of different kinds of dependencies: The ones I mentioned are
needed for compiling LyX, the others like python and ghostscript are for
building the installer or running LyX.
Le 14/10/2015 07:27, David Hyde a écrit :
Which of these
are things that should actually be downloaded and compiled on the fly?
For example, do you think that Python and ghostscript should be
compiled from source, or do you think it suffices to just include up-to
-date Windows binaries? Same q
Hi Georg,
Thanks for your reply!
> This is possible, but needs some work.
>
> The current MSVC build instructions use some pre-compiled third party
> libraries. Of course these work only for exactly one MSVC version.
> Therefore
> I would propose the following procedure instead of just replicat
David Hyde wrote:
> Hi there,
>
>
> I'm interested in compiling LyX on Windows. I've read through the
> INSTALL.Win32 file and was able to get LyX to compile from source using
> Visual C++ Express 2010, following the instructions in that file.
Great!
> I'
Hi there,
I'm interested in compiling LyX on Windows. I've read through the
INSTALL.Win32 file and was able to get LyX to compile from source using Visual
C++ Express 2010, following the instructions in that file. I'm wondering
though, is it possible (do people have experie
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Peter Kuemmel wrote:
>> Dear all,
>> Well I've now confirmed what I long thought: LyX is a monster to
>> compile. I have a quickish:
>> - 64-bit
>> - 2x Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8400 @ 3.00GHz
>> - 4GB of RAM
>> -
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 8:04 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
> Am 14.02.2014 um 20:04 schrieb Liviu Andronic :
>
>> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>>> PS: Errors like "Makefile:3567: *** missing separator. Stop."
>>> are possibly caused by unresolved merge conflicts.
>>>
>> What ab
> Dear all,
> Well I've now confirmed what I long thought: LyX is a monster to
> compile. I have a quickish:
> - 64-bit
> - 2x Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8400 @ 3.00GHz
> - 4GB of RAM
> - 7200 rpm
>
> but compiling LyX still manages to make me impatient.
>
&g
Am 14.02.2014 um 20:04 schrieb Liviu Andronic :
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
>> PS: Errors like "Makefile:3567: *** missing separator. Stop."
>> are possibly caused by unresolved merge conflicts.
>>
> What about:
> checking for library containing socket... none require
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Stephan Witt wrote:
> PS: Errors like "Makefile:3567: *** missing separator. Stop."
> are possibly caused by unresolved merge conflicts.
>
What about:
checking for library containing socket... none required
configure: creating ./config.status
config.status: creati
, Stephan Witt wrote:
>>>>> Am 14.02.2014 um 10:00 schrieb Liviu Andronic :
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>> Well I've now confirmed what I long thought: LyX is a monster to
>>>>>> compile. I have a quickish:
>
On 14/02/14 09:42, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> To compile with two cores, use
>> make -j2
>
> Actually, I find -j3 to be a bit better, maybe because there is less idle
> time.
yes, while one gcc process suspends for disk access (reading sources or writing
compiled objects), there's another on
14/02/2014 10:03, Scott Kostyshak:
Is there a way to compile LyX using all the available 2 cores? As far
as I can see, only one core is being used right now.
To compile with two cores, use
make -j2
Actually, I find -j3 to be a bit better, maybe because there is less
idle time.
JMarc
eb Liviu Andronic :
>>>>
>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>> Well I've now confirmed what I long thought: LyX is a monster to
>>>>> compile. I have a quickish:
>>>>> - 64-bit
>>>>> - 2x Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8400
#x27;ve now confirmed what I long thought: LyX is a monster to
>>>> compile. I have a quickish:
>>>> - 64-bit
>>>> - 2x Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8400 @ 3.00GHz
>>>> - 4GB of RAM
>>>> - 7200 rpm
>>>>
>>>> but com
mpile. I have a quickish:
>>> - 64-bit
>>> - 2x Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8400 @ 3.00GHz
>>> - 4GB of RAM
>>> - 7200 rpm
>>>
>>> but compiling LyX still manages to make me impatient.
>>
>> Oh, well.
>>
>
>>
&g
2 Duo CPU E8400 @ 3.00GHz
>> - 4GB of RAM
>> - 7200 rpm
>>
>> but compiling LyX still manages to make me impatient.
>
> Oh, well.
>
>> Is there a way to compile LyX using all the available 2 cores? As far
>> as I can see, only one core is being use
Am 14.02.2014 um 10:00 schrieb Liviu Andronic :
> Dear all,
> Well I've now confirmed what I long thought: LyX is a monster to
> compile. I have a quickish:
> - 64-bit
> - 2x Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8400 @ 3.00GHz
> - 4GB of RAM
> - 7200 rpm
>
> but compil
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 4:00 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
> Dear all,
> Well I've now confirmed what I long thought: LyX is a monster to
> compile. I have a quickish:
> - 64-bit
> - 2x Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8400 @ 3.00GHz
> - 4GB of RAM
> - 7200 rpm
>
> but com
Dear all,
Well I've now confirmed what I long thought: LyX is a monster to
compile. I have a quickish:
- 64-bit
- 2x Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E8400 @ 3.00GHz
- 4GB of RAM
- 7200 rpm
but compiling LyX still manages to make me impatient.
Is there a way to compile LyX using all the availa
On 11/02/2014 09:54, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Paola Manzini
wrote:
On 11/02/2014 07:49, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
The cmake file is in: lyx-20/development/cmake
Vincent, many thanks, I've actually found the Cmakelists.txt file in the
directory you s
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Paola Manzini
wrote:
>
> On 11/02/2014 07:49, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
>
> The cmake file is in: lyx-20/development/cmake
>
> Vincent, many thanks, I've actually found the Cmakelists.txt file in the
> directory you specified, it is there, yet Cmake still tell
On 11/02/2014 07:49, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
The cmake file is in: lyx-20/development/cmake
Vincent, many thanks, I've actually found the Cmakelists.txt file in the
directory you specified, it is there, yet Cmake still tells me there is no
file. I have also tried moving the directories fo
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 11:26 PM, Paola Manzini
wrote:
>
> On 10/02/2014 21:58, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
>>
>> Paola schreef op 10-2-2014 22:01:
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> on a windows 8.1 machine I am trying to follow the instructions here:
>>>
>>> http://www.lyx.org/trac/browser/lyx-devel/trun
On 10/02/2014 21:58, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Paola schreef op 10-2-2014 22:01:
Hi All,
on a windows 8.1 machine I am trying to follow the instructions here:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/browser/lyx-devel/trunk/INSTALL.Win32
to compile Lyx 2.0.7 for windows as I want to modify the (hard code
Paola schreef op 10-2-2014 22:01:
Hi All,
on a windows 8.1 machine I am trying to follow the instructions here:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/browser/lyx-devel/trunk/INSTALL.Win32
to compile Lyx 2.0.7 for windows as I want to modify the (hard coded) icons
size, otherwise illegible on my high definit
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Paola wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> on a windows 8.1 machine I am trying to follow the instructions here:
>
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/browser/lyx-devel/trunk/INSTALL.Win32
>
> to compile Lyx 2.0.7 for windows as I want to modify the (hard coded) icons
> size, otherwise ille
Hi All,
on a windows 8.1 machine I am trying to follow the instructions here:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/browser/lyx-devel/trunk/INSTALL.Win32
to compile Lyx 2.0.7 for windows as I want to modify the (hard coded) icons
size, otherwise illegible on my high definition convertible laptop.
I have dow
Am 26.04.2013 um 18:46 schrieb Elmar Hinz :
>
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> Am Freitag, 26. April 2013 um 18:23:56, schrieb Elmar Hinz
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > IMHO there is no libc6 for mac. There is a
> >
> > /usr/lib/libSystem.dylib -> libSystem.B.dylib
> >
> > Elmar
Am Freitag, 26. April 2013 um 18:46:17, schrieb Elmar Hinz
>
> I find a _debug* and a _profile* variant:
No, what you found are files, not packages.
Check please to which package belongs a specified file.
(I don't know how, sorry)
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
Am Freitag, 26. April 2013 um 18:31:11, schrieb Elmar Hinz
>
> Anyway, That doesn't bring in the missing Info.plist.
>
> Question: Why is there no Info.plist in the source?
There is. It should be created from Info.plist.in at configure time.
That file itself is in the build-directory.
(See mai
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Kornel Benko wrote:
> **
>
> Am Freitag, 26. April 2013 um 18:23:56, schrieb Elmar Hinz <
> t3el...@googlemail.com>
>
> > Hello,
>
> >
>
> > IMHO there is no libc6 for mac. There is a
>
> >
>
> > /usr/lib/libSystem.dylib -> libSystem.B.dylib
>
> >
>
> > Elmar
>
>
> OK didn't follow the instruction:
> make LyX2.1 (to build the binary only)
> or
> make package (to get a mac bundle)
>
Anyway, That doesn't bring in the missing Info.plist.
Question: Why is there no Info.plist in the source?
--
Elmar Hinz
Freiherr-vom-Stein-Str. 1
33014 Bad Driburg
TYPO3 com
Am Freitag, 26. April 2013 um 18:23:56, schrieb Elmar Hinz
> Hello,
>
> IMHO there is no libc6 for mac. There is a
>
> /usr/lib/libSystem.dylib -> libSystem.B.dylib
>
> Elmar
>
Is there also a appropriate devel *package*?
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
> or prefered:
>
> b.) Install the devel package for libc6 (on ubuntu libc6-dev)
>
>
>
> > Elmar
>
> >
>
> Kornel
>
Hello,
IMHO there is no libc6 for mac. There is a
/usr/lib/libSystem.dylib -> libSystem.B.dylib
Elmar
--
Elmar Hinz
Freiherr-vom-Stein-Str. 1
33014 Bad Driburg
TYPO3 community
> The second one seems to be cased by the first one.
>
OK didn't follow the instruction:
make LyX2.1 (to build the binary only)
or
make package (to get a mac bundle)
Elmar
--
Elmar Hinz
Freiherr-vom-Stein-Str. 1
33014 Bad Driburg
TYPO3 community contact: t.3.e.l.m.a...@.g.m.a.i.l.dot.c.o.m
pe
Am Freitag, 26. April 2013 um 16:44:22, schrieb Elmar Hinz
> here is the command line I use (with cmake, out of source build) in a build
> directory (different from LyX main directory). It works with QT installed
> via the QT installer package (not from source):
>
> >
> > cmake -DLYX_BUNDLE=ON -
Summary:
* QT 4.8.4 installed via the QT installer package (not from source)
* brew install cmake
* cmake -DLYX_NLS=OFF -DLYX_BUNDLE=ON -DLYX_COCOA=ON -DLYX_INSTALL=ON
-DLYX_RELEASE=OFF -DLYX_DEBUG=ON -DLYX_EXTERNAL_LIBINTL=OFF .
* make
* make install
Errors from cmake:
CMake Error: Target LyX I
here is the command line I use (with cmake, out of source build) in a build
directory (different from LyX main directory). It works with QT installed
via the QT installer package (not from source):
>
> cmake -DLYX_BUNDLE=ON -DLYX_COCOA=ON -DLYX_INSTALL=ON -DLYX_RELEASE=OFF
> -DLYX_DEBUG=ON PATH_TO
Hi,
here is the command line I use (with cmake, out of source build) in a build
directory (different from LyX main directory). It works with QT installed via
the QT installer package (not from source):
cmake -DLYX_BUNDLE=ON -DLYX_COCOA=ON -DLYX_INSTALL=ON -DLYX_RELEASE=OFF
-DLYX_DEBUG=ON PATH_
Hello,
before diving into coding I need to learn how to compile LyX.
The documentation for Mac is a little out-of-date, so I try to
find my own way.
I compiled Qt4 and LyX. The first build did break immediately upon start.
Currently I try to compile both with
export CPPFLAGS="-arch i386"
export
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes:
>
> | I meant gcc 4.4. Qt is 4.6 of course.
>
> When does support of 10.04 stop?
>
> IMHO, when a distro goes into not-supported-mode we should not have to
> care about it anymore. Of course the LTS distros pose a problem in that
> resp
Pavel Sanda writes:
| Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>> Would be fun to see how far off we are from being able to use C++11.
>
| Which minimum version of gcc/MSVC is needed for your fun?
I think we have to wait a bit.
I'd prefere c++11 to be out of experimental state in gcc. So gcc 4.8
earliest, alt
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:28:58AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes:
>
> | Le 29/10/2012 06:36, Liviu Andronic a écrit :
> >> On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> >> wrote:
> >>> I have 4.4 on my ubuntu 10.04 install.
> >>>
> >> Are you sure? Ub
Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> Would be fun to see how far off we are from being able to use C++11.
Which minimum version of gcc/MSVC is needed for your fun?
Are there other projects around KDE/Qt already using C++11?
Perhaps the natural time would be when Qt start to use it.
Pavel
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> When does support of 10.04 stop?
>
2013-04 [1]. When 2.1 is out Ubuntu Lucid (desktop) will no longer be
supported.
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ubuntu_os#Releases
> IMHO, when a distro goes into not-supported-mode we should not
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes:
| Le 29/10/2012 06:36, Liviu Andronic a écrit :
>> On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>> wrote:
>>> I have 4.4 on my ubuntu 10.04 install.
>>>
>> Are you sure? Ubuntu Lucid ships Qt 4.6.2 [1].
>> [1]
>> http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=l
Le 29/10/2012 06:36, Liviu Andronic a écrit :
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
I have 4.4 on my ubuntu 10.04 install.
Are you sure? Ubuntu Lucid ships Qt 4.6.2 [1].
[1]
http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=libqt4&searchon=names&suite=all§ion=all
I meant g
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> I think using 4.5 as baseline would be very safe and allow for code
> simplification.
Anyone against this?
Pavel
Le 27/10/12 01:35, Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
Do any of you have feeling what compilers are use to compile LyX
now-a-days, that at what version they are?
Would be fun to see how far off we are from being able to use C++11.
I have 4.4 on my ubuntu 10.04 install.
JMarc
Le 27/10/12 13:44, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
Yes. It would be nice to know what is the last Qt version we actually
do compile with the current trunk and clean up all older ifdefs in the
code.
Anyone with Qt 4.4, 4.5 around here to test?
I have 4.6 at work with my old ubuntu 10.04.
I think using 4
André Pönitz wrote:
> > The oldest gcc I'm still encountering on actively used boxes around
> > is 4.2.1, but from my experiments with compiling/using LyX, the real
> > stopper is Qt version, because while we (should) still compile with
> > Qt 4.2.x
>
> This is, by the way, an absurd restriction.
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 02:00:42AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> > Do any of you have feeling what compilers are use to compile LyX
> > now-a-days, that at what version they are?
>
> The oldest gcc I'm still encountering on actively used boxes around
> is 4.2.1, but from
André Pönitz writes:
| On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 01:35:26AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>
>> Do any of you have feeling what compilers are use to compile LyX
>> now-a-days, that at what version they are?
>>
>> Would be fun to see how far off we are from being able to use C++11.
>
| Might b
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 01:35:26AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> Do any of you have feeling what compilers are use to compile LyX
> now-a-days, that at what version they are?
>
> Would be fun to see how far off we are from being able to use C++11.
Might be worth a look:
http://blogs.msd
Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> Do any of you have feeling what compilers are use to compile LyX
> now-a-days, that at what version they are?
The oldest gcc I'm still encountering on actively used boxes around
is 4.2.1, but from my experiments with compiling/using LyX, the real
stopper is Qt version
Do any of you have feeling what compilers are use to compile LyX
now-a-days, that at what version they are?
Would be fun to see how far off we are from being able to use C++11.
--
Lgb
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 12:02:15AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Systemcall.cpp:337:65: error: inconsistent user-defined literal suffixes
> ‘__FILE__’ and ‘QTOSTRING’ in string literal
> Systemcall.cpp:337:65: error: unable to find user-defined string literal
> operator ‘operator"" __FILE__
On 22/11/2011 22:09, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
On 21/11/2011 23:40, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
>
> And won't have, as long as the core steers the gui [ 1/2 ;-) ]
>
> Andre'
And the core will be steering the GUI as long as we can't use qt
signals in the core.
And we won't use Qt signals
On 21/11/2011 23:40, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
>
> And won't have, as long as the core steers the gui [ 1/2 ;-) ]
>
> Andre'
And the core will be steering the GUI as long as we can't use qt
signals in the core.
And we won't use Qt signals in the core as long as nobody makes the
effor
1 - 100 of 494 matches
Mail list logo
