On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 05:38:39PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Wasn't John talking about separate "edit" and "display" command buffers.
> Ie, all commands are displayed in the "display" buffer" that I see at the
> bottom of your screenshot.
That's right.
> Hitting M-x would make the "edit" b
On Tuesday 23 July 2002 5:54 pm, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > Wouldn't that be a bit distracting ?
>
> Personally I don't think so. It's like run command under KDE (alt-f2) which
> I find very convenient.
>
> > Bear in mind the command buffer is
> > a feature for power users only really, and sooner or
On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 06:54:57PM +0200, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > Wouldn't that be a bit distracting ?
>
> Personally I don't think so. It's like run command under KDE (alt-f2) which I
> find very convenient.
Well, so do I, but then again I only ever use the minicli to start
programs, not to i
> Wouldn't that be a bit distracting ?
Personally I don't think so. It's like run command under KDE (alt-f2) which I
find very convenient.
> Bear in mind the command buffer is
> a feature for power users only really, and sooner or later it will be
> possible to hide/show it from the menus.
>
>
On Tue, Jul 23, 2002 at 06:39:55PM +0200, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> Wouldn't it be nicer to have a little modal window with an editable combobox
> as a command buffer? It would popup with M-x and disappear after use...
Wouldn't that be a bit distracting ? Bear in mind the command buffer is
a featur
Wouldn't it be nicer to have a little modal window with an editable combobox
as a command buffer? It would popup with M-x and disappear after use...
Ed.
lyx.png
Description: PNG image
