Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> I'm no fan of hidden features that are only usable by a few developers
> since normal users won't find them in the docs.
i dont see any problem when we have some features which are to be used
only by power users, who know how to treat advanced problems they encounter.
what i fe
>> We already support _every_ available Unicode symbol and take care of the
>> needed packages.
>
> Come on, you know that this is not true (and can never be true, even if you
> try hard, simply because there is a lot of stuff that is not supported in
> LaTeX).
That's why I wrote also this senten
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb:
We don't support the characters used by apple for its keyboard symbols,
and this causes grief when trying to
typeset Shortcuts.lyx with Qt/Mac 4.5.X
We only support this because there is no LaTeX package available that provides these characters when
I remember c
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> What is the problem of this particular package? Is it something we
> could solve by
> contacting the package author? Everytime this is possible, I think
> this is
> the correct solution.
Actually, there are two packages for inverse diagonal dots. The problems in
both
Le 20 juin 09 à 19:10, Georg Baum a écrit :
Instead of implementing such a checkbox for each package (and making
the
dialog unusable), a general solution should be found, e.g. some
package
list that can be easily extended, and where each packaga can be set to
off/auto/on, and where each packa
Le 20 juin 09 à 17:03, Uwe Stöhr a écrit :
> An if you cut an paste a unicode symbol that needs some package?
We already support _every_ available Unicode symbol and take care of
the needed packages. (That was my goal when I extended the
unicodesymbols file for LyX 1.5.) If you find a chara
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> > And if the thing does not turn into an integral, how do you know where
> > it came from and how to pick the right package?
>
> I know then that LyX doesn't support this command and that I have to take
> care of it.
>
> > An if you cut an paste a unicode symbol that needs
> And if the thing does not turn into an integral, how do you know where it
came from and how to
> pick the right package?
I know then that LyX doesn't support this command and that I have to take care
of it.
> An if you cut an paste a unicode symbol that needs some package?
We already suppor
Le 20 juin 09 à 01:01, Uwe Stöhr a écrit :
Done, but how should a user know that he has to add something to the
preamble when a command appears in a formula as image and not as red
command? I mean when I read that there is a command named \sqint I
type it in a formula. The command changes to
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb:
The only user visible difference to the previous state is that if a user
types \iddots or \adots, the command is not displayed in red, but the
dots are drawn instead.
But this implies that LyX supports them completely.
No. Reread what Georg said.
Done, but ho
Le 20 juin 09 à 00:22, Uwe Stöhr a écrit :
The only user visible difference to the previous state is that if a
user
types \iddots or \adots, the command is not displayed in red, but
the dots are drawn instead.
But this implies that LyX supports them completely.
No. Reread what Georg said.
The only user visible difference to the previous state is that if a user
types \iddots or \adots, the command is not displayed in red, but the
dots are drawn instead.
But this implies that LyX supports them completely.
The new commands do not appear in any menu and not in
any documentation. I
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Uwe Stöhr writes:
>
>> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb:
>>
>>> As I understand, there is no plan for now, because the package yhmath
>>> causes incompatibilities with some others.
>>
>> But we should do something since it is our aim to avoid LaTeX errors.
>> So when we
Uwe Stöhr writes:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb:
>
>> As I understand, there is no plan for now, because the package yhmath causes
>> incompatibilities with some others.
>
> But we should do something since it is our aim to avoid LaTeX errors.
> So when we support these commands, we should at le
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb:
As I understand, there is no plan for now, because the package yhmath causes
incompatibilities with some others.
But we should do something since it is our aim to avoid LaTeX errors. So when we support these
commands, we should at least show the users a message t
Uwe Stöhr writes:
> Hello Georg,
>
> \iddots and \adots look in LyX exactly the same, is that correct? When
> I use the new commands, the document is not compilable because the
> needed packages weren't loaded as you wrote in syntax.default. But
> what are your plans that the users don't get LaTe
Hello Georg,
\iddots and \adots look in LyX exactly the same, is that correct? When I use the new commands, the
document is not compilable because the needed packages weren't loaded as you wrote in
syntax.default. But what are your plans that the users don't get LaTeX errors?
regards Uwe
17 matches
Mail list logo
