On Friday 31 August 2001 16:40, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Friday 31 August 2001 16:01, John Levon wrote:
> | > On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 04:31:24PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | >
> | > > | But this is a democracy I opt for reverting yo
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 05:40:20PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I guess that what we will do is to leave the tuples in, but add the
> tie back into boost/utility.hpp (unless the boost folks come up with
> something clever)
Do we need 'tie' or does boost need it itself?
Andre'
--
André P
On Friday 31 August 2001 16:01, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 04:31:24PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> > | But this is a democracy I opt for reverting your boost changes, let's
see
> > | what others say.
> >
> > but it isn't really... and as always when we stumble onto bad
On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 04:31:24PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | But this is a democracy I opt for reverting your boost changes, let's see
> | what others say.
>
> but it isn't really... and as always when we stumble onto bad
> compilers we wait a bit... calm down... and try to realize _
On 31-Aug-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>| Well Lars I really have to say that Angus is right we ARE in codefreeze and
>| you are still adding new stuff!
>
> New stuff??
Did you add new files? Yes! Well than that's what you did! We don't care
about a new boost version if the actual works jus
On Friday 31 August 2001 14:54, Juergen Vigna wrote:
> On 31-Aug-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> > This is acutyually no real change, but an upgrade of the boost code.
> >
> > hmm... you are not using the latest version of the cxx compiler are
> > you?
> >
> > most likely a compiler deficie
On 31-Aug-2001 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> This is acutyually no real change, but an upgrade of the boost code.
>
> hmm... you are not using the latest version of the cxx compiler are
> you?
>
> most likely a compiler deficiency...
We don't care about this NOW, we are in codefreeze so your c
On 31-Aug-2001 Angus Leeming wrote:
> I thought we were in a code-freeze, bug fix mode? Well, as of today, it
> appears that I cannot contribute. My compiler appears not to be up to this
> tuple stuff.
Well Lars I really have to say that Angus is right we ARE in codefreeze and
you are still ad
I thought we were in a code-freeze, bug fix mode? Well, as of today, it
appears that I cannot contribute. My compiler appears not to be up to this
tuple stuff.
Angus
cxx -std strict_ansi -nocleanup -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I.. -I..
-I../boost -I../src/cheaders -I/usr/local/include -msg_d
