On Friday 31 August 2001 16:40, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Friday 31 August 2001 16:01, John Levon wrote:
> | > On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 04:31:24PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | >
> | > > | But this is a democracy I opt for reverting your boost changes,
let's
> | see
> | > > | what others say.
> | > >
> | > > but it isn't really... and as always when we stumble onto bad
> | > > compilers we wait a bit... calm down... and try to realize _WHY_
> | > > things stop working, before just shouting _REVERT REVERT_.
> | >
> | > And in the meantime Angus is prevented from helping to fix the HUGE
pile of
> | bugs
> | > we have ... all for the sake of a pointless upgrade ...
> |
> | No, I have a fix. It just came as a bit of a surprise.
> |
> | Lars, the wee program below isolates my problems. Code compiles with
> | utility.hpp but not with tuple.hpp. Would it be helpful if I sent the
error
> | messages?
>
> no not really. and how can you compile? tie is not in utility.hpp anymore.
Sorry. It is in mine; I reverted.
Have a good weekend. I'm off to the beach.
Angus
>
> I guess that what we will do is to leave the tuples in, but add the
> tie back into boost/utility.hpp (unless the boost folks come up with
> something clever)
